惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

J
Java Code Geeks
博客园 - 司徒正美
博客园 - 【当耐特】
爱范儿
爱范儿
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
IT之家
IT之家
人人都是产品经理
人人都是产品经理
雷峰网
雷峰网
酷 壳 – CoolShell
酷 壳 – CoolShell
freeCodeCamp Programming Tutorials: Python, JavaScript, Git & More
大猫的无限游戏
大猫的无限游戏
月光博客
月光博客
宝玉的分享
宝玉的分享
V
V2EX
S
SegmentFault 最新的问题
V
Visual Studio Blog
阮一峰的网络日志
阮一峰的网络日志
Martin Fowler
Martin Fowler
Jina AI
Jina AI
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
博客园_首页
L
LangChain Blog
D
Docker
腾讯CDC

World Economic Forum

What happened at the MC14 WTO meeting in Yaoundé How giving gorillas digital wallets can help finance nature Why is leadership a strategic investment for philanthropy? Counting the many costs of the global mental health burden What we learned from the 2026 World Bank Spring Meetings Crop protection is at risk. How innovation can help Here's a playbook for boards on how to govern agentic AI Why connected data makes AI decision-ready for sustainability 3 ways better data practices are reshaping financial supervision What technology convergence looks like in practice 7 reasons the old order broke — and how it might be repaired How governments can make agentic AI re  ? Current and future uses of RNA, including mRNA vaccines Real-time deepfakes are rewriting the rules of child safety Electrification trend ‘unmistakeable’ – and more energy stories From smallpox to the common cold: A brief history of vaccines Saudi Arabia's new AI-powered sustainability platform could unlock $20 billion by 2030 Here are 6 ways that climate change is affecting sports around the world This crisis could be an opportunity for the energy transition Middle East war: 6 ways countries are responding to the historic energy shock Nature can teach us about leadership and building resilience How did the Strait of Hormuz become so important, and will it stay that way? Yes/Cities: Helping global cities become more resilient, sustainable and prosperous Healthy ageing in APAC: The role of the influenza vaccine Risk management, renewables and a rocky road ahead: Spring Meetings takeaways Japan in a world of rising middle powers EU plans to offset Iran war's energy impact, and other climate and nature news 3 cities leading on green investment for economic growth The coffee industry is making the case for climate insurance The ocean is now a subprime asset, so we need a sustainable blue economy
Freedom of expression under attack: How do we protect the...
Cilla Benkö · 2026-04-21 · via World Economic Forum
  • New research reveals a decline in freedom of expression amid an increasingly autocratic-looking global landscape.
  • In many places media organizations are subject to growing political pressure and journalists face personal harassment.
  • A pluralistic and robust media landscape is needed in order to defend democracy and reduce vulnerability to demagoguery.

We are living in a challenging time, with the state of the world’s democracies deteriorating. In my 40 years as a journalist, I have never been as concerned as I am today. We need a broad debate in defence of democracy and the media freedom that is necessary for democracy to function.

The condition of global democracy has not been this poor in nearly 50 years. Across country after country, authoritarian leaders are gaining ground. Democracy is being pushed back, and freedom of expression can no longer be taken for granted in many places. The erosion often begins with restrictions on media freedom.

A few weeks ago, the V-Dem Institute at the University of Gothenburg presented its annual report mapping the state of democracy worldwide. It has not looked this bad since 1978. In just one year, freedom of expression has declined in 44 countries. There are 92 autocracies worldwide, and 87 democracies. Strikingly, 74% of the world’s population live in autocracies and only 7% live in liberal democracies.

Researchers in Gothenburg and their colleagues around the world are clear: The clock is being turned back at an alarming pace – including in Europe. Seven European Union countries are undergoing autocratization. The findings should spark outrage far beyond the usual circles. Yet there have been no major headlines, no sustained public debate. Gradually, we are witnessing the normalization of changes that would once have been unthinkable.

I have worked as a journalist in Sweden for four decades and spent much of that time within the European Broadcasting Union (EBU). Never before have I felt such deep concern. I regularly meet colleagues from across Europe and hear their accounts: Politicians seeking to interfere in editorial work, publicly mocking journalists, threatening to withdraw funding unless coverage aligns with their preferred narrative. I hear of new regulations designed to make it easier to remove media executives who refuse to fall in line. The list goes on.

Attacks on the media are a central component of the infrastructure of autocratization – both in Europe and globally. They often come early, as countries begin to drift away from liberal democracy. Media freedom is curtailed through direct attacks, through the use of political platforms, or by exerting influence over regulatory bodies. Developments in the United States deserve particular attention. Attacks on journalists and media institutions there stand out as deeply troubling. Commercial media face threats of heavy fines and revoked licences. Public service media are stripped of funding. Journalists are ridiculed and harassed.

According to V-Dem, the US has lost its status as a liberal democracy for the first time in more than half a century. The report concludes: “The speed with which American democracy is currently dismantled is unprecedented in modern history.”

After decades in journalism, I have never been more convinced of the importance of independent and free media. A pluralistic and robust media landscape – where strong public service media coexist with thriving commercial outlets – reduces vulnerability to demagoguery. It strengthens accountability and makes it easier to hold those in power to account.

The moment we, as citizens, stop sharing a common understanding of reality, meaningful public conversation becomes increasingly difficult. With parallel realities, truth becomes relative. It matters whether we believe it was Vladimir Putin or Volodymyr Zelenskyy who started the war in Ukraine, to take one example. By attacking independent media and tightening control over the flow of information, politicians seeking power can more easily shape – and dominate – the narrative.

We must also recognize that we are living in an era where producing false information has never been easier. State actors deliberately spread disinformation, often on social media, to sow division, undermine trust in institutions, and weaken societal resilience. Here, too, the presence of independent media with broad reach and strong credibility is essential. Without trusted sources that citizens rely on, society becomes more vulnerable in times of crisis. The war in Ukraine – and the extensive resources Russia devotes to distorting facts, spreading falsehoods and eroding resistance – offers a stark illustration.

History is clear: Democracy is never guaranteed. The V-Dem report clearly shows the figures reflecting global developments. Ignoring the trend would be a grave mistake.

To me, one of the most vital safeguards of democracy is the presence of free and independent media. We all share a responsibility to protect and defend those who are increasingly under attack. This is a struggle that must be fought every single day.