惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

量子位
GbyAI
GbyAI
V
Vulnerabilities – Threatpost
阮一峰的网络日志
阮一峰的网络日志
罗磊的独立博客
Recorded Future
Recorded Future
CTFtime.org: upcoming CTF events
CTFtime.org: upcoming CTF events
博客园 - 司徒正美
Y
Y Combinator Blog
Microsoft Security Blog
Microsoft Security Blog
美团技术团队
博客园 - Franky
Blog — PlanetScale
Blog — PlanetScale
B
Blog RSS Feed
V
Visual Studio Blog
Martin Fowler
Martin Fowler
Threat Intelligence Blog | Flashpoint
Threat Intelligence Blog | Flashpoint
博客园_首页
C
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency CISA
博客园 - 叶小钗
AWS News Blog
AWS News Blog
Project Zero
Project Zero
T
Threat Research - Cisco Blogs
V
V2EX
F
Fortinet All Blogs
The GitHub Blog
The GitHub Blog
Latest news
Latest news
N
News and Events Feed by Topic
The Last Watchdog
The Last Watchdog
T
Threatpost
L
Lohrmann on Cybersecurity
小众软件
小众软件
IT之家
IT之家
MongoDB | Blog
MongoDB | Blog
博客园 - 聂微东
Engineering at Meta
Engineering at Meta
爱范儿
爱范儿
Google Online Security Blog
Google Online Security Blog
Forbes - Security
Forbes - Security
Attack and Defense Labs
Attack and Defense Labs
The Register - Security
The Register - Security
K
KPMG report finds enterprise disconnect between AI and its ROI | CIO
H
Help Net Security
Security Latest
Security Latest
Recent Announcements
Recent Announcements
C
Check Point Blog
B
Blog
Google DeepMind News
Google DeepMind News
K
Kaspersky official blog
I
InfoQ

Secret Weblog

Becoming More Xee: A Modern XPath and XSLT Engine in Rust Looking for new challenges! Repeat Yourself, A Bit The Curious Case of Quentell The Humble For Loop in Rust The Humble For Loop in JavaScript Don Question Best Practices I Was a 1980s Teenage Programmer Part 5: Achieving Assembly I Was a 1980s Teenage Programmer Part 4: The Call of Assembly The Tooling Shift I Was a 1980s Teenage Programmer Part 3: MSX-2 JavaScript: when you need two ways to do it! Empowering Programming Languages Bloat and Retrofuturism Refreshing my Blog Again Random Rust Impressions Apilar: An Alife System I Was a 1980s Teenage Programmer Part 2: Olivetti M24 I Was a 1980s Teenage Programmer: the Alphatronic SolidJS fits my brain Is premature optimization the root of all evil? Framework Patterns: JavaScript edition Roll Your Own Frameworks Framework Patterns Secret Weblog Highlights Refactoring to Multiple Exit Points mstform: a form library for mobx-state-tree Seven Years: A Very Personal History of the Web Morepath 0.16 released! Is Morepath Fast Yet? Introducing Bob Strongpinion Punctuated Equilibrium in Software Morepath 0.15 released! Impressions of React Europe 2016 Morepath 0.14 released! Morepath 0.13 now with Dectate Dectate: advanced configuration for Python code JavaScript Dependencies Revisited: An Example Project The Incredible Drifting Cyber A Brief History of Reselect The Emerging GraphQL Python stack Thoughts about React Europe Build a better batching UI with Morepath and Jinja2 GraphQL and REST Server Templating in Morepath 0.10 10 reasons to check out the Morepath web framework in 2015 A Review of the Web and how Morepath fits in Morepath 0.9 released! Better REST with Morepath 0.8 Morepath 0.7: new inter-app linking They say something I don Life at the Boundaries: Conversion and Validation BowerStatic 0.4 released! Morepath 0.6 released! Morepath 0.5(.1) and friends released! Against On Naming In Open Source My visit to EuroPython 2014 Morepath 0.4.1 released (with Python 3 fixes) Morepath 0.4 and breaking changes Announcing BowerStatic Morepath 0.3 released! Morepath 0.2 Morepath Python 3 support The Call of Python 2.8 Morepath 0.1 released! WebOb and Werkzeug compared Morepath: from Werkzeug to WebOb Racing the Morepath: SQLAlchemy Integration The Centre Cannot Hold Breaking Morepath Changes Morepath Update How to do REST with Morepath Morepath Security the Gravity of Python 2 #python2.8 discussion channel on freenode Alex Gaynor on Python 3 Morepath Documentation Starting to Take Shape Back to the Center Morepath App Reuse Implementing Grok Grok: the Idea Why Linux Works for Me On the Morepath Reg, Now With More Generic! The New Zope as a Web Framework Jim Fulton, Zope Architect Renewing Zope Object Publishing The Weirdness of Zope The Rise of Zope My Exit from Zope Reg: Component Architecture Reimagined JSConf EU 2013 impressions Obviel 1.0! JS Dependency Tools Redux Obviel 1.0rc1 released! Succinct data structures
New HTTP 1.1 RFCs versus WSGI
Martijn Faassen · 2014-08-19 · via Secret Weblog

Recently new HTTP 1.1 RFCs were published that obsolete the old HTTP 1.1 RFCs. They are extensively rewritten.

Unfortunately the WSGI PEP 3333 refers to something only made explicit in the old version of the RFCs, but which is much harder to find in the new versions of the RFCs. I thought I'd leave a report of my investigations here so that others who may run into this in the future can find it.

WSGI is a protocol that's like HTTP but isn't quite HTTP. In particular WSGI defines its own iterator-based way to send larger responses out in smaller parts. It therefore cannot deal with so-called "hop-by-hop" headers, which try to control this behavior on a HTTP level. The WSGI spec says a WSGI application must not generate such headers.

This is relevant when you're dealing with a WSGI-over-HTTP proxy. This is a special WSGI application that talks to an underlying HTTP server. It presents itself as a normal WSGI application.

The underlying HTTP server could very well be sending out stuff like such as Transfer-Encoding: chunked. The WSGI spec does not allow a WSGI application to send them out though, so a WSGI proxy must strip these headers out.

So what headers are to be stripped out? The WSGI spec refers to section 13.5.1 in now-obsolete RFC 2616.

This nicely lists hop-by-hop headers:

  • Connection
  • Keep-Alive
  • Proxy-Authenticate
  • Proxy-Authorization
  • TE
  • Trailers
  • Transfer-Encoding
  • Upgrade

That RFC also says:

"All other headers defined by HTTP/1.1 are end-to-end headers."

and then confusingly:

"Other hop-by-hop headers MUST be listed in a Connection header, (section 14.10) to be introduced into HTTP/1.1 (or later)."

which one is it, HTTP 1.1? I guess that's one of the reasons this text got rewritten.

In the new rewritten version of HTTP 1.1, this list is gone. Instead it specifies for some headers (such as TE and Upgrade) that these should be added to the Connection field. A HTTP proxy can then strip out the headers listed in Connection, and then also strip out Connection itself.

Confusingly, while the new RFC 7230 refers to the concept of 'hop-by-hop' early on, and also say this in the change notes in A.2:

"Also, "hop-by-hop" header fields are required to appear in the Connection header field; just because they're defined as hop-by-hop in this specification doesn't exempt them."

it doesn't actually say any headers are hop-by-hop anywhere else. Instead it mandates some headers should be added to Connection.

But wait: Transfer-Encoding is not to be listed in the Connection header, as it's not hop-by-hop. At least, not anymore. I've seen it described as 'hopX-by-hopY', but not in the RFC. This is, I think, because a HTTP proxy could let these through without having to remove them. But not for a WSGI over HTTP proxy: it MUST remove Transfer-Encoding, as WSGI applications have no such concept.

I think the WSGI PEP should be updated in terms of the new HTTP RFC. It should make explicit that some headers such as Transfer-Encoding must not be specified by a WSGI app, and that no headers that must be listed in Connection can be specified by a WSGI app, or something like that.

Relevant mailing list thread:

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-http-wg/2014JulSep/thread.html#msg1710