惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

Jina AI
Jina AI
freeCodeCamp Programming Tutorials: Python, JavaScript, Git & More
B
Blog
T
The Blog of Author Tim Ferriss
量子位
Microsoft Azure Blog
Microsoft Azure Blog
博客园 - Franky
小众软件
小众软件
Recent Announcements
Recent Announcements
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
I
InfoQ
美团技术团队
G
Google Developers Blog
Engineering at Meta
Engineering at Meta
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
V
Visual Studio Blog
云风的 BLOG
云风的 BLOG
博客园 - 【当耐特】
IT之家
IT之家
Microsoft Security Blog
Microsoft Security Blog
博客园 - 聂微东
Last Week in AI
Last Week in AI
H
Hackread – Cybersecurity News, Data Breaches, AI and More
H
Help Net Security

Semafor

US inflation jumps, though long-term war impact yet to be seen Hospitals consider replacing some radiologists with AI Amazon takes a jab at Nvidia over chips shift VCs step in to fund university upstarts Exclusive: Anthropic is gaining on OpenAI’s revenue, but hasn’t yet eclipsed it Exclusive: AI powerhouses threaten data processing firms A South African artist is changing the way viewers understand Picasso’s Guernica Airbnb faces familiar battle in Cape Town First look at war-related inflation sparks political jostling View: China’s state businesses are reshaping markets in Africa US issues Nigeria travel warning over terrorism, kidnapping FirstRand exits UK business after regulatory hit Afreximbank’s $800M answer to Fitch Exclusive: Navy takes nuclear-powered sub offline after $800 million cost run-up Cuba leader says he will not step down Fed, Treasury summon Wall Street chiefs over AI fears How Bluesky earned its reputation — and why it could be the way of the future China eyes stronger Taiwan influence Orbán slams Hungary’s opposition as he trails in polls Iran war reshapes air travel, perhaps for the long term Tehran residents embrace calm amid tenuous truce Countries lack fiscal capacity to handle war fallout Higher producer prices ease China deflation fears Trump ‘optimistic’ on Iran peace talks Inside the five-year succession plan at a $130B warehouse giant Georges Elhedery on HSBC’s big bets on the Gulf and Asia Warsh’s Fed hearing slips past next week Moore takes on the Sun’s ‘MAGA billionaire’ and more Debatable: AI titans influencing regulation Americans still think taxes are too high, poll finds
View: Europe is debating the terms of its industrial surr...
Andy Browne · 2026-06-23 · via Semafor

It can be easy to forget that, until recently, modern China had precious little technology of its own.

Living in Beijing in the early 1990s, excited crowds would gather around my made-in-Taiwan mountain bike, gasping at the apparently fancy features unavailable on Chinese-built Flying Pigeons (like, for example, gear cogs). The city’s wide boulevards were so devoid of cars that on hot summer nights, residents would set out chairs and card tables in the traffic lanes to catch the breeze from an occasional passing vehicle.

Today, Western politicians complain that China achieved its meteoric technological rise through “forced technology transfer.” In reality, the handover was mostly voluntary.

US and European CEOs willingly traded knowhow for the promise of market access. In the early years, they used the Chinese market as a dumping ground for obsolete technology. My first mobile phone — for which I had to submit a written application to the Shanghai branch of the Ministry of Posts and Telecommunications as part of a lottery system — was a Motorola “brick,” so heavy I needed a backpack to carry it around.

Later, Western CEOs passed along vast amounts of cutting-edge technology they couldn’t deploy elsewhere in the world — like high-speed trains — or which, for strategic reasons, didn’t fit into their global portfolios: General Electric sold its entire avionics division to state-owned AVIC, which later built the C919 airliner that now competes with Boeing and Airbus.

Indeed, Western multinationals happily seeded entire industries in China. In Apple in China, the Financial Times reporter Patrick McGee describes how the US firm’s advanced manufacturing supply chain birthed China’s world-beating consumer electronics sector. Tesla played a similar role in EVs.

China outplayed them all. It did so, in the first instance, by negotiating the wholesale transfer of Western industrial blueprints on astonishingly generous terms, then by absorbing the knowledge, and now by rapidly iterating on Western inventions — all in the span of a single generation.

In a sense, Western multinationals unwittingly created their chief global competitors, along with the conditions for their own demise.

That’s the central dilemma now facing policymakers in the US and Europe, struggling to respond to a deluge of Chinese technology exports that threaten rapid deindustrialization. The differing responses on either side of the Atlantic are instructive.

Washington has decided to erect sky-high tariff barriers, an approach that makes a certain sense — but only if tariffs are accompanied by smart industrial policy to nurture innovation. There are promising signs that US businesses are rallying against the challenge. One indication: A new generation of well-built, affordable EV trucks are about to roll off US assembly lines.

Europe, by contrast, appears to be debating the terms of its own industrial surrender. Meeting over a dinner of sea bass in Brussels last week, EU leaders deferred action to defend their pillar industries from a deluge of subsidized Chinese technology exports, agreeing only to create unspecified “diversification instruments” — trade tools to protect the continent. They didn’t even name China as a threat. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, one of the attendees at the dinner, summed up the mood of indecision. According to the South China Morning Post he made two interjections: One was “forthright,” the other “urged caution.”

Far from diversifying away from China, Europe is deepening its dependencies. As European automakers retrench in the face of Chinese competition, Chinese firms are taking over the spare factory space as a part of a stealth strategy to conquer global markets.

Eventually, Beijing’s heavily subsidized export machine will run out of gas; it’s simply not possible for an economy the size of China’s to keep growing by borrowing demand from the rest of the world. The end game is possibly a debt crisis. But waiting for the Chinese economy to implode isn’t much of a strategy for the West. The threat is imminent — and existential.