惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

WordPress大学
WordPress大学
Stack Overflow Blog
Stack Overflow Blog
人人都是产品经理
人人都是产品经理
Y
Y Combinator Blog
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
D
DataBreaches.Net
GbyAI
GbyAI
Microsoft Security Blog
Microsoft Security Blog
博客园_首页
大猫的无限游戏
大猫的无限游戏
Jina AI
Jina AI
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
Engineering at Meta
Engineering at Meta
IT之家
IT之家
MongoDB | Blog
MongoDB | Blog
The GitHub Blog
The GitHub Blog
月光博客
月光博客
U
Unit 42
Hugging Face - Blog
Hugging Face - Blog
博客园 - 叶小钗
腾讯CDC
B
Blog RSS Feed
博客园 - Franky
爱范儿
爱范儿

The Guardian

Rory McIlroy surges into six-shot Masters lead with stunning second-round flourish ‘That’ll be the end’: actor Sam Neill joins fight to stop controversial goldmine near his New Zealand vineyard Roberto De Zerbi targets ‘Ange-ball’ revival to save Spurs from relegation Bath hit back to reach semi-final after stunning Northampton in 11-try epic Secret Garden to Outcome: the week in rave reviews Zebras, wealth and power: Hungary’s election tests Orbán’s grip on power ‘TikTok effect’ brings sellout crowds and younger fans to Grand National meeting The war over Omagh’s gold: the £21bn mine plan tearing a community apart Britain’s shadow workforce is paid as little as 65p an hour. Who cares for the carers? From You, Me & Tuscany to Euphoria: your complete entertainment guide to the week ahead Six great reads: the man who let snakes bite him, masked heavy metal and the brutal reality for foreign students in the UK American Classic review – I defy you not to fall in love with Kevin Kline and Laura Linney’s tender comedy Cuba’s doctors were a lifeline for the world. Now the Caribbean is shamefully complicit in the US drive to expel them An environmental disaster in Moldova has Russia’s fingerprints all over it RMIT drops misconduct case against student who accused university of being ‘complicit in Gaza genocide’ Ichiro Suzuki statue unveiling goes awry as bronze bat snaps during ceremony Survivors of Epstein’s abuse accuse Melania Trump of ‘shifting burden’ on to victims European football: Real Madrid held at home by Girona to extend winless run Arne Slot insists he is ‘aligned’ with Liverpool board and fans as squad is rebuilt Kamala Harris ‘thinking about’ running for president again in 2028 JD Vance warns Iran against trying to ‘play’ the US in peace talks West Ham double up twice to thrash Wolves and put Spurs in relegation zone Trump administration releases new renderings of so-called ‘Arc de Trump’ Crispin Odey drops £79m libel claim against FT over sexual misconduct allegations Bafta apologises for events surrounding John Davidson’s Tourette’s outburst Cocktail of the week: Bar Shrimp’s la rosita – recipe New drug may extend survival in aggressive ovarian cancer, trial shows One dead and 27 injured after bus with British passengers crashes in Canary Islands Pope adds to Smith’s mass of Surrey runs with England woes a world away OpenAI CEO Sam Altman’s home targeted with molotov cocktail
Ambivalence by Brian Dillon review – an odd man out
Blake Morrison · 2026-06-03 · via The Guardian

Brian Dillon lost his parents early, his mother when he was 16, his father at 21. He writes of them in passing here, as he did in his first book, In the Dark Room, but with little overt display of grief. Narrated in the third person, with young Dillon a removed he rather than an emotionally manipulative I, this isn’t a weepy orphanhood memoir. It describes instead his awkward Dublin education, as he struggles to carve out an identity for himself and to accommodate his passion for avant garde music and literature within academe.

He grows up surrounded by the books acquired by his father, who left school early and went to university late. He reads them avidly and adds to them with library borrowings and purchases of his own. But, to begin with, his greater attachment is to music magazines and to David Bowie, whose excitingly ambivalent sexuality echoes his own. His father speaks of duty – to homework, weekly mass and getting a decent job. But his commitment is to jouissance, if only he can find it.

His recall of his teens and early 20s is astonishing. Without a diary or notebook to draw on, only memory and “an anxious rereading of my MA and PhD theses”, he documents the books he read, the records he bought, the gurus who inspired him, Virginia Woolf, Roland Barthes and Walter Benjamin chief among them. At 17 he’s reading Jean Genet, Michel Foucault and Tristan Tzara. By 24 he seems to have read everything. Could he love anyone who doesn’t like Derrida? No.

He worries about being called a poseur, and owns up to preferring any writer, musician or philosopher dismissed as a charlatan. His teachers and parents have called him bright, and in his own fashion he’s learning how books written by outlaws can “solve everything”, or at least shape a life. But he has done little schoolwork since his mother’s death, spending hours in a state of indolence and reverie. His confidence is shaky. And he resents how teachers treat education not as a matter of learning but of obedience.

During a year at a college for disappointed university candidates he moves on, developing an aesthetic that celebrates androgyny and “undecidability”. And at University College Dublin he finds a cohort of like-minded subversives as well as an inspiring tutor, Thomas Docherty. Even his father’s sudden death doesn’t throw him off track; on the contrary, he’s bequeathed a sum of £8,000 even before he and his two brothers sell the family home, enough to keep him going for several years, he decides with foolish optimism. His exam results are good, too, even if he feels “as if he has been rewarded for sensibility rather than study”.

Not everything is quite so upbeat, though. Away from university, and sometimes marring his performance there, his life is “furtive, shameful, horrific”. He has violent fights with one of his brothers, P (out of discretion many of the book’s personnel are identified by capital letters; even he is a mere B). He botches potential relationships, suffers from tremors, drinks too much and is haunted by the “imperious demands of his loneliness”. Though he has found his niche intellectually, by embracing critical theory, which to him has more glamour than poetry or fiction (“B’s unquestioned mantra: Always theorize!”), it dawns on him that his scholarly writing is a form of autobiography. To friends he denies the trauma of losing his parents: it’s all in the past, he tells them, these days he feels next to nothing. But when he writes, in reference to Ruskin, of “a weakened subjectivity … caused by a particular kind of grief which ‘unhinges’ the mind”, he’s writing of himself.

On the face of it a book about 10 years spent in academic study has limited appeal. But when he’s not merely reeling off reading lists in a “library-bound stupor” Brian Dillon is a stimulating intellectual companion, quietly heroic in his determination “to pursue a life in words and ideas”, yet by his own harsh estimate slothful and unfocused. The book ends with him organising a conference, getting work on RTÉ radio and moving to Canterbury to continue his PhD. A success story, you think, but, ruefully self-denigrating as always, he sees it differently, working out that his unfinished thesis has cost him a pound a word.