惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

Recent Announcements
Recent Announcements
人人都是产品经理
人人都是产品经理
月光博客
月光博客
博客园 - 三生石上(FineUI控件)
GbyAI
GbyAI
博客园 - 司徒正美
美团技术团队
Vercel News
Vercel News
IT之家
IT之家
U
Unit 42
Y
Y Combinator Blog
罗磊的独立博客
Microsoft Security Blog
Microsoft Security Blog
MongoDB | Blog
MongoDB | Blog
Jina AI
Jina AI
V
Visual Studio Blog
B
Blog
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
MyScale Blog
MyScale Blog
博客园 - 叶小钗
A
About on SuperTechFans
WordPress大学
WordPress大学
Hugging Face - Blog
Hugging Face - Blog
B
Blog RSS Feed

The Guardian

Rory McIlroy surges into six-shot Masters lead with stunning second-round flourish ‘That’ll be the end’: actor Sam Neill joins fight to stop controversial goldmine near his New Zealand vineyard Roberto De Zerbi targets ‘Ange-ball’ revival to save Spurs from relegation Bath hit back to reach semi-final after stunning Northampton in 11-try epic Secret Garden to Outcome: the week in rave reviews Zebras, wealth and power: Hungary’s election tests Orbán’s grip on power ‘TikTok effect’ brings sellout crowds and younger fans to Grand National meeting The war over Omagh’s gold: the £21bn mine plan tearing a community apart Britain’s shadow workforce is paid as little as 65p an hour. Who cares for the carers? From You, Me & Tuscany to Euphoria: your complete entertainment guide to the week ahead Six great reads: the man who let snakes bite him, masked heavy metal and the brutal reality for foreign students in the UK American Classic review – I defy you not to fall in love with Kevin Kline and Laura Linney’s tender comedy Cuba’s doctors were a lifeline for the world. Now the Caribbean is shamefully complicit in the US drive to expel them An environmental disaster in Moldova has Russia’s fingerprints all over it RMIT drops misconduct case against student who accused university of being ‘complicit in Gaza genocide’ Ichiro Suzuki statue unveiling goes awry as bronze bat snaps during ceremony Survivors of Epstein’s abuse accuse Melania Trump of ‘shifting burden’ on to victims European football: Real Madrid held at home by Girona to extend winless run Arne Slot insists he is ‘aligned’ with Liverpool board and fans as squad is rebuilt Kamala Harris ‘thinking about’ running for president again in 2028 JD Vance warns Iran against trying to ‘play’ the US in peace talks West Ham double up twice to thrash Wolves and put Spurs in relegation zone Trump administration releases new renderings of so-called ‘Arc de Trump’ Crispin Odey drops £79m libel claim against FT over sexual misconduct allegations Bafta apologises for events surrounding John Davidson’s Tourette’s outburst Cocktail of the week: Bar Shrimp’s la rosita – recipe New drug may extend survival in aggressive ovarian cancer, trial shows One dead and 27 injured after bus with British passengers crashes in Canary Islands Pope adds to Smith’s mass of Surrey runs with England woes a world away OpenAI CEO Sam Altman’s home targeted with molotov cocktail
Swearing banned by one in five councils in England and Wa...
Amelia Hill · 2026-04-29 · via The Guardian

One in five local councils have banned swearing under new “busybody” orders, up from one in 20 councils in 2022.

A new report by the Campaign for Freedom in Everyday Life has found that public spaces protection orders (PSPOs) – originally intended to tackle serious anti-social behaviour – are being used by councils in England and Wales to criminalise a wide range of everyday activities, including standing in groups, shouting and picking up stones.

“Councils have introduced a swathe of bizarre bans that will turn ordinary people into unwitting criminals,” said Josie Appleton, the director of the group. “Councils have used PSPOs – which allow them to ban any activity they judge to have a ‘detrimental effect on the quality of life’ – to introduce over 1,000 new laws, each of which can contain dozens of separate restrictions.

“These orders are not subject to democratic or legal scrutiny: they can be brought through by a single unelected council officer, and do not require public consultation or full council assent.”

PSPO penalty examples
PSPO penalties are at an all-time high, with 25,000 fines issued in 2025. Photograph: Canterbury City Council

The research, based on freedom of information requests submitted to 319 councils, found that 271 (91%) of the 297 councils who responded had at least one PSPO in place, including 13 councils placing restrictions on feeding birds – a measure that led to a woman being arrested in Harrow this year.

PSPO penalties are at an all-time high, with 25,000 fines issued in 2025. “75% of these penalties are issued by private enforcement companies who are paid per fine, and therefore have an incentive to issue as many penalties as possible,” said Appleton.

The fines are due to rise from £100 to £500 when the crime and policing bill finishes its passage through parliament. “The government recently lost three votes in a row in the House of Lords, as peers voted to ban fining for profit for PSPOs. Unfortunately, the government rejected the amendments, but has agreed to make changes to statutory guidance,” Appleton said.

In total, the councils introduced 1,268 new orders, each of which can contain up to 30 individual restrictions.

Guildford borough council has banned “intentionally shouting or screaming”. Picking up rocks is banned in an area of Torbay, and picking up stones, soil, or turf is banned in Richmond upon Thames and Rugby, where foraging for blackberries is also prohibited.

Appleton said: “The research also highlights cases where PSPOs are being used against activities that communities actively welcome.”

In Bury, 17-year-old Charlie Wilson – a Britain’s Got Talent contestant – was handcuffed by police and issued a penalty notice for busking, despite members of the public gathering to watch and enjoy his performance. “Everyone’s enjoying it”, Wilson told officers. “To cheer people up, is that a crime now?”

In Leicester, a political campaigner in her 70s was among eight people told they would be fined in 2025 for flying a flag or campaigning in public without council permission, with activists reporting that obtaining that permission was in effect impossible.

Appleton said: “Many of the orders place enormous discretion in the hands of individual officers, effectively allowing them to decide on the spot whether a member of the public has broken the law. Several councils have criminalised causing ‘annoyance’, a standard so subjective it could apply to almost any behaviour an officer finds disagreeable.”

Gosport prohibits sitting or loitering “in a manner causing or likely to cause harassment, alarm, distress, nuisance or annoyance to any person”.

Lancaster city council bans groups of two or more from allowing “their actions to cause annoyance” to anyone nearby. A spokesperson for the council said its approach was “always proportionate”. “Swearing or shouting are not offences in themselves and action is only taken where behaviour causes annoyance, alarm or distress to others,” they added.