惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

G
Google Developers Blog
宝玉的分享
宝玉的分享
月光博客
月光博客
B
Blog
云风的 BLOG
云风的 BLOG
Google DeepMind News
Google DeepMind News
Engineering at Meta
Engineering at Meta
aimingoo的专栏
aimingoo的专栏
N
Netflix TechBlog - Medium
博客园_首页
GbyAI
GbyAI
人人都是产品经理
人人都是产品经理
A
About on SuperTechFans
Y
Y Combinator Blog
L
LangChain Blog
有赞技术团队
有赞技术团队
D
Docker
爱范儿
爱范儿
博客园 - 司徒正美
H
Hackread – Cybersecurity News, Data Breaches, AI and More
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
酷 壳 – CoolShell
酷 壳 – CoolShell
Microsoft Security Blog
Microsoft Security Blog
D
DataBreaches.Net

The Guardian

Rory McIlroy surges into six-shot Masters lead with stunning second-round flourish ‘That’ll be the end’: actor Sam Neill joins fight to stop controversial goldmine near his New Zealand vineyard Roberto De Zerbi targets ‘Ange-ball’ revival to save Spurs from relegation Bath hit back to reach semi-final after stunning Northampton in 11-try epic Secret Garden to Outcome: the week in rave reviews Zebras, wealth and power: Hungary’s election tests Orbán’s grip on power ‘TikTok effect’ brings sellout crowds and younger fans to Grand National meeting The war over Omagh’s gold: the £21bn mine plan tearing a community apart Britain’s shadow workforce is paid as little as 65p an hour. Who cares for the carers? From You, Me & Tuscany to Euphoria: your complete entertainment guide to the week ahead Six great reads: the man who let snakes bite him, masked heavy metal and the brutal reality for foreign students in the UK American Classic review – I defy you not to fall in love with Kevin Kline and Laura Linney’s tender comedy Cuba’s doctors were a lifeline for the world. Now the Caribbean is shamefully complicit in the US drive to expel them An environmental disaster in Moldova has Russia’s fingerprints all over it RMIT drops misconduct case against student who accused university of being ‘complicit in Gaza genocide’ Ichiro Suzuki statue unveiling goes awry as bronze bat snaps during ceremony Survivors of Epstein’s abuse accuse Melania Trump of ‘shifting burden’ on to victims European football: Real Madrid held at home by Girona to extend winless run Arne Slot insists he is ‘aligned’ with Liverpool board and fans as squad is rebuilt Kamala Harris ‘thinking about’ running for president again in 2028 JD Vance warns Iran against trying to ‘play’ the US in peace talks West Ham double up twice to thrash Wolves and put Spurs in relegation zone Trump administration releases new renderings of so-called ‘Arc de Trump’ Crispin Odey drops £79m libel claim against FT over sexual misconduct allegations Bafta apologises for events surrounding John Davidson’s Tourette’s outburst Cocktail of the week: Bar Shrimp’s la rosita – recipe New drug may extend survival in aggressive ovarian cancer, trial shows One dead and 27 injured after bus with British passengers crashes in Canary Islands Pope adds to Smith’s mass of Surrey runs with England woes a world away OpenAI CEO Sam Altman’s home targeted with molotov cocktail
Rembrandt painting was altered to erase turban from man’s...
https://www.theguardian.com/profile/dalya-alberge · 2026-06-26 · via The Guardian

Layers of overpaint have been removed from a 17th-century painting, confirming that it was painted by Rembrandt and revealing that a turban on one of the figures had been replaced with a traditional Dutch soft cap.

A later anonymous hand had amended or sanitised Rembrandt’s original, apparently misunderstanding that its biblical theme – “Let the Little Children Come Unto Me” – is about tolerance, with Christ blessing children as well as adults. In the gospel of Saint Luke, Jesus rebukes his disciples for turning away parents who brought their children to him: “Suffer [allow] little children, and forbid them not, to come unto me: for of such is the kingdom of heaven.”

Rembrandt depicted a crowd of diverse figures. As well as the man in the turban, Jewish and Christian faiths are also represented.

Side-by-side of the painted-over version and the restored original
In the painted-over version (left), the turban was replaced with a traditional Dutch soft cap and the child clothed, among other changes. Composite: Sotheby’s

The artist seems to have been inspired by the multicultural, religiously diverse streets of 17th-century Holland. When he painted it, religious rivalry was rife and large numbers of refugees were coming to Holland, many settling in Rembrandt’s birthplace, Leiden, to the dismay of most of the city’s population.

The art historian Andrew Graham-Dixon said the painting tallied with Rembrandt’s close connection with the Remonstrants, a group that argued for religious tolerance and acceptance.

“In 1627, when Rembrandt started this painting, Leiden was undergoing an extraordinary humanitarian crisis. The thirty years’ war was at its height, and … hundreds of thousands of people were flooding into the Dutch republic as refugees. In 1626, 1,500 weavers alone arrived there, with their wives and children … so there’s a massive crush of people. It’s estimated that Leiden took something like 10,000 refugees in that one year,” Graham-Dixon said.

“Now, when Rembrandt is painting this, he’s painting this crowded scene of Christ welcoming children, welcoming families. This was very controversial at the time. There were people in Leiden who didn’t want to welcome them. But what we can tell from this painting is that Rembrandt is on the side of humanitarian relief … “So, this is more than just a painting, I think it’s a statement of Rembrandt’s moral position.”

The painting, which measures 106cm by 80.5cm, was discovered in 2014 in a German auction, which had catalogued it as an anonymous “Netherlandish 17th-century painting”.

Now, having been attributed to Rembrandt, it will be auctioned by Sotheby’s in London on 1 July with an estimate of £8m to £12m, reflecting that it is among the most significant early works by Rembrandt remaining in private hands.

Alex Bell, the chair emeritus of Sotheby’s UK, told the Guardian: “It was made into a more traditional, conventional treatment of the subject by the later over-painting, the original having a more diverse cast of characters, including the prominent, turbaned figure in the middle.”

The foreground of the painting was left unfinished, completed rather crudely by the later artist. The restoration has now removed the additions, “demonstrating the extent to which the painting was simplified, or sanitised, by subsequent intervention”, Bell said.

While Rembrandt had painted a naked child in the crowd, the later artist had clothed him.

skip past newsletter promotion

Bell said: “We don’t know what Rembrandt’s ultimate plan was for the completion of this figure but, as we see it now, it is undoubtedly much more striking than the overpainted version, and emphasises the vulnerability of the children seeking Christ’s blessing.”

Research has revealed that this was a particularly personal painting for Rembrandt as he depicted various members of his family, including his parents and himself, as the young man seemingly craning forward to see the miraculous event, while looking directly at the viewer.

Bell said: “In no other image does Rembrandt bring his family together so completely.”

Rembrandt’s parents had hoped he would pursue a career in law, administration or the church, but they recognised his talent and funded his artistic training.

One theory is that as the work was painted shortly after his apprenticeship with a leading Amsterdam artist, Pieter Lastman, Rembrandt was showing his parents that their investment had paid off.

The painting will be unveiled to the public from 27 June at Sotheby’s London, the first opportunity to see it in its restored state and as Rembrandt would recognise it.