惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

Last Week in AI
Last Week in AI
阮一峰的网络日志
阮一峰的网络日志
P
Proofpoint News Feed
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
MongoDB | Blog
MongoDB | Blog
云风的 BLOG
云风的 BLOG
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
J
Java Code Geeks
WordPress大学
WordPress大学
T
The Blog of Author Tim Ferriss
V
Visual Studio Blog
小众软件
小众软件
Microsoft Azure Blog
Microsoft Azure Blog
博客园_首页
IT之家
IT之家
Vercel News
Vercel News
C
Check Point Blog
Google DeepMind News
Google DeepMind News
月光博客
月光博客
D
DataBreaches.Net
酷 壳 – CoolShell
酷 壳 – CoolShell
美团技术团队
Y
Y Combinator Blog
Hugging Face - Blog
Hugging Face - Blog

The Guardian

Rory McIlroy surges into six-shot Masters lead with stunning second-round flourish ‘That’ll be the end’: actor Sam Neill joins fight to stop controversial goldmine near his New Zealand vineyard Roberto De Zerbi targets ‘Ange-ball’ revival to save Spurs from relegation Bath hit back to reach semi-final after stunning Northampton in 11-try epic Secret Garden to Outcome: the week in rave reviews Zebras, wealth and power: Hungary’s election tests Orbán’s grip on power ‘TikTok effect’ brings sellout crowds and younger fans to Grand National meeting The war over Omagh’s gold: the £21bn mine plan tearing a community apart Britain’s shadow workforce is paid as little as 65p an hour. Who cares for the carers? From You, Me & Tuscany to Euphoria: your complete entertainment guide to the week ahead Six great reads: the man who let snakes bite him, masked heavy metal and the brutal reality for foreign students in the UK American Classic review – I defy you not to fall in love with Kevin Kline and Laura Linney’s tender comedy Cuba’s doctors were a lifeline for the world. Now the Caribbean is shamefully complicit in the US drive to expel them An environmental disaster in Moldova has Russia’s fingerprints all over it RMIT drops misconduct case against student who accused university of being ‘complicit in Gaza genocide’ Ichiro Suzuki statue unveiling goes awry as bronze bat snaps during ceremony Survivors of Epstein’s abuse accuse Melania Trump of ‘shifting burden’ on to victims European football: Real Madrid held at home by Girona to extend winless run Arne Slot insists he is ‘aligned’ with Liverpool board and fans as squad is rebuilt Kamala Harris ‘thinking about’ running for president again in 2028 JD Vance warns Iran against trying to ‘play’ the US in peace talks West Ham double up twice to thrash Wolves and put Spurs in relegation zone Trump administration releases new renderings of so-called ‘Arc de Trump’ Crispin Odey drops £79m libel claim against FT over sexual misconduct allegations Bafta apologises for events surrounding John Davidson’s Tourette’s outburst Cocktail of the week: Bar Shrimp’s la rosita – recipe New drug may extend survival in aggressive ovarian cancer, trial shows One dead and 27 injured after bus with British passengers crashes in Canary Islands Pope adds to Smith’s mass of Surrey runs with England woes a world away OpenAI CEO Sam Altman’s home targeted with molotov cocktail
A reason to vote Labour tomorrow: we are the only party t...
Katie White · 2026-05-06 · via The Guardian

Strip away the politics, and the climate crisis debate isn’t complicated. We’re changing the planet in ways that are “damaging and dangerous”, and every country will be affected. “No one can opt out.”

Those quotes might sound as if they came from a leftwing Scandinavian leader, but they are, in fact, from Margaret Thatcher. Speaking to the UN general assembly in 1989, Britain’s then prime minister tore into world leaders and warned that there was “no good squabbling over who is responsible or who should pay”.

Not the obvious place for a Labour climate minister to start, but it matters.

From Thatcher to New Labour’s 2008 Climate Change Act and Theresa May’s net zero target, Britain has benefited on this issue from something usually in short supply: political consensus. There has been a shared belief that the climate crisis is real and that we have a responsibility to play our proper, humble role in tackling it.

It’s never been a hard sell here. This is a country that rinses jam jars, hoards “bags for life” and sells or shares what we no longer need. That instinct to make things last runs deep – I saw it first-hand when I worked at the WWF and Friends of the Earth. Yet, sadly, 2026 is already seeing the political consensus on the climate start to crack. Even as the war in Iran chokes global energy supplies, some pick a fight rather than face the facts.

While Reform UK’s Richard Tice has said it is “absolute garbage” to claim that human activity is the main cause of the climate crisis, companies he’s led have boasted of “zero net emissions” buildings, some featuring solar panels and electric vehicle charging points. One company of which he is chief executive told shareholders last year that those solar panels generating electricity were “saving hundreds of tonnes of CO2 per annum”.

At the same time, Kemi Badenoch, who once backed net zero as “crucial”, now wants to repeal the Climate Change Act, reverse Labour’s ban on new oil and gas licences and disband the independent Climate Change Committee, a world-class group of experts Britain should be proud of.

But if this is meant to be a culture war, the public hasn’t turned up – 84% of Britons say the climate is changing and 68% want government action. Landslide territory. Even Beyoncé’s popularity rating only sits at about 54%.

On the climate, the country isn’t divided, it’s decided – and miles ahead of any politics dragging it backwards. This isn’t a fight we need. We’ve shown we can agree on the goal and get results. Letting that consensus slip helps no one.

Yet, if we are going to call out the right, we must be just as honest about the left. Even the Green party is letting the side down.

The Greens have abandoned Caroline Lucas’s legacy for something far less ambitious. Green councillors oppose pylons needed to bring clean energy to homes in Suffolk (echoed by a Green MP in Westminster), block solar in Kent and push back on schemes to clean up the air in London. In fact, across 10,000 words of Green party material in 21 leaflets since Zack Polanski became leader, there has been only one mention of climate change, according to Climate Outreach.

You can’t call it a climate emergency on Monday and block the solutions on Tuesday. That’s not environmentalism, it’s greenwashing. Polanski is trying to convince the public into thinking the Greens still lead on climate while blocking the very things that cut emissions.

This is where Labour is different. Labour is now Britain’s climate party, not by accident but by choice, because we’re prepared to build.

Our task is clear: electrify our economy and take oil and gas out of our veins as our lifeblood. While others argue or block, we’re delivering the biggest transformation in how this country is powered in a generation.

Coal is now all but gone from our energy system, replaced by renewables that now generate more than half of our electricity, up from 6.5% in 2010. In less than two years, we’ve secured enough clean power for more than 23m homes, backed new nuclear and approved record solar, with Great British Energy set to invest billions, backing offshore wind in Scotland, hydrogen in South Yorkshire and solar on school rooftops across the country.

Electric vehicles are now cheaper to buy and run, with more than 100,000 charge points. Solar and heat pumps are taking off, backed by Labour grants.

The climate fight isn’t decided in Westminster alone. It’s street by street, project by project, with councillors on the frontline deciding what gets built. The local elections this week will determine whether progress accelerates or stalls. This is the choice between ambition and procrastination, between getting things built or finding reasons to block them.

If you believe in climate action that actually delivers, this is the moment to vote for it.

  • Katie White is the Labour MP for Leeds North West and a minister for climate in the Department of Energy Security and Net Zero

  • Do you have an opinion on the issues raised in this article? If you would like to submit a response of up to 300 words by email to be considered for publication in our letters section, please click here.