惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

酷 壳 – CoolShell
酷 壳 – CoolShell
Microsoft Security Blog
Microsoft Security Blog
Recent Announcements
Recent Announcements
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
Last Week in AI
Last Week in AI
罗磊的独立博客
腾讯CDC
云风的 BLOG
云风的 BLOG
月光博客
月光博客
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
博客园 - 三生石上(FineUI控件)
宝玉的分享
宝玉的分享
U
Unit 42
I
InfoQ
D
DataBreaches.Net
Blog — PlanetScale
Blog — PlanetScale
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
V
V2EX
美团技术团队
IT之家
IT之家
Stack Overflow Blog
Stack Overflow Blog
F
Fortinet All Blogs
GbyAI
GbyAI
S
SegmentFault 最新的问题

The Guardian

Rory McIlroy surges into six-shot Masters lead with stunning second-round flourish ‘That’ll be the end’: actor Sam Neill joins fight to stop controversial goldmine near his New Zealand vineyard Roberto De Zerbi targets ‘Ange-ball’ revival to save Spurs from relegation Bath hit back to reach semi-final after stunning Northampton in 11-try epic Secret Garden to Outcome: the week in rave reviews Zebras, wealth and power: Hungary’s election tests Orbán’s grip on power ‘TikTok effect’ brings sellout crowds and younger fans to Grand National meeting The war over Omagh’s gold: the £21bn mine plan tearing a community apart Britain’s shadow workforce is paid as little as 65p an hour. Who cares for the carers? From You, Me & Tuscany to Euphoria: your complete entertainment guide to the week ahead Six great reads: the man who let snakes bite him, masked heavy metal and the brutal reality for foreign students in the UK American Classic review – I defy you not to fall in love with Kevin Kline and Laura Linney’s tender comedy Cuba’s doctors were a lifeline for the world. Now the Caribbean is shamefully complicit in the US drive to expel them An environmental disaster in Moldova has Russia’s fingerprints all over it RMIT drops misconduct case against student who accused university of being ‘complicit in Gaza genocide’ Ichiro Suzuki statue unveiling goes awry as bronze bat snaps during ceremony Survivors of Epstein’s abuse accuse Melania Trump of ‘shifting burden’ on to victims European football: Real Madrid held at home by Girona to extend winless run Arne Slot insists he is ‘aligned’ with Liverpool board and fans as squad is rebuilt Kamala Harris ‘thinking about’ running for president again in 2028 JD Vance warns Iran against trying to ‘play’ the US in peace talks West Ham double up twice to thrash Wolves and put Spurs in relegation zone Trump administration releases new renderings of so-called ‘Arc de Trump’ Crispin Odey drops £79m libel claim against FT over sexual misconduct allegations Bafta apologises for events surrounding John Davidson’s Tourette’s outburst Cocktail of the week: Bar Shrimp’s la rosita – recipe New drug may extend survival in aggressive ovarian cancer, trial shows One dead and 27 injured after bus with British passengers crashes in Canary Islands Pope adds to Smith’s mass of Surrey runs with England woes a world away OpenAI CEO Sam Altman’s home targeted with molotov cocktail
How to train your brain to see possibility instead of doom
Dr Hannah Cr · 2026-04-19 · via The Guardian

It can feel as though the world is tilting towards chaos: political shocks, economic instability, technological upheaval and a constant stream of bad news. Faced with so much uncertainty, many of us default to a sense of impending doom. But is that reaction hardwired – or can we train ourselves to keep a more open mind?

A useful starting point is humility. Every generation, it seems, believes it inhabits uniquely turbulent times, as literary epics down the ages testify. Uncertainty has always been part of the human condition, and none of us can really know what tomorrow holds.

Yet recognising this does not make it easy to bear. In fact, our brains are exquisitely sensitive to uncertainty. From a neuroscientific perspective, unpredictability is costly. The brain is an energy-hungry organ that relies on following patterns and habits in order to conserve effort. When faced with ambiguity, it must work harder – analysing, predicting, recalibrating. This extra effort is not just tiring; it can feel actively unpleasant.

Research suggests uncertainty can be more distressing than negative certainty. In one study, people were calmer when they knew they would receive an electric shock than when there was only a 50% chance of one. The ambiguity, not the pain, proved harder to tolerate. Similarly, long-term evidence suggests that the threat of losing a job can be more harmful to health than unemployment itself.

This tells us something important: the brain is wired not just to avoid harm, but to avoid not knowing. From an evolutionary standpoint, that makes sense. Our ancestors survived by making rapid judgments with limited information. If a rustle in the bushes might be a predator, it was always safer to assume the worst. This negativity bias keeps us alive – but in modern life it can lead us to overestimate threat and underestimate opportunity.

The result is a cognitive trap. Faced with uncertainty, we tend to narrow our thinking, rush to conclusions and cling to simple explanations. In extreme cases, this can manifest as anxiety, rigid beliefs or even susceptibility to conspiracy theories – frameworks that impose order on a confusing world.

But there is another way. The poet John Keats described “negative capability”: the ability to remain “in uncertainties, mysteries, doubts, without any irritable reaching after fact and reason”. Modern neuroscience increasingly supports this strategy. The capacity to tolerate ambiguity – to sit with not knowing – appears central to flexible, creative and resilient thinking.

At the level of perception, this flexibility is already at work. Our brains do not passively receive reality; they construct it. We are bombarded with vast amounts of sensory data, yet consciously process only a tiny fraction. The rest is filled in through best guesses, shaped by past experience.

You may have come across that ambiguous drawing that can be seen as either a duck or a rabbit. When you look at it, your brain will settle on one interpretation to resolve the uncertainty. But with practice, you can learn to switch between the two perspectives. This ability to hold multiple interpretations in mind is closely linked to creativity and problem solving. In other words, perception itself is trainable.

So how might we shift from a mindset of doom to something more open? The first step is curiosity. When we’re suddenly unsure about what might happen next, our instinct may be to withdraw or rush to judgment. A more adaptive response is to ask: what do I not yet know?

High-performing teams in fields such as Formula One racing operate this way. As the Formula One executive Mark Gallagher puts it: “We go into a race knowing there are some things we can control but far more that we cannot – and we have to adapt to those things as and when they happen.” Thriving in uncertainty, in other words, is less about prediction than about adaptability.

In everyday life, this means seeking out different perspectives and resisting the pull of easy answers. It also means being selective about information. In an era of misinformation, the brain’s urge to resolve questions as soon as possible can lead us towards flawed conclusions unless we actively engage our critical thinking.

Emotional regulation is equally important. Uncertainty triggers stress responses that impair judgment and narrow attention. Techniques such as controlled breathing, mindfulness and physical exercise can help stabilise these responses.

Importantly, this is not about blind optimism. Our brains are prone to both negativity bias and optimism bias – the tendency to be sensitive to threat while also overestimating positive outcomes for ourselves. Navigating uncertainty well means balancing these tendencies, avoiding catastrophising at one end, and wishful thinking at the other.

Social context plays a role as well. Emotions are contagious both in person and online. Spending time with people who are open-minded and reflective can shape how we respond to uncertainty, just as environments dominated by fear can amplify it.

None of this makes uncertainty easy. It remains uncomfortable, sometimes deeply so. Nor should we suppress negative emotions such as fear or anger; they carry useful information. The challenge is to respond to them intelligently, using them as signals rather than allowing them to dictate our behaviour.

Ultimately, the question is not whether we can eliminate uncertainty, but how we relate to it. We can treat it as a threat, clinging to false certainties and narrowing our perspective. Or we can treat it as an inevitable – and potentially generative – feature of life, one that invites exploration, learning and change. The difference lies not in what life throws at us, but in the habits of mind we cultivate.

In a rapidly changing world, the ability to tolerate uncertainty may be one of our most important cognitive skills. It protects against both paralysis and delusion, avoids kneejerk reactions, and underpins sound decision-making. Perhaps most importantly of all, it opens the door to possibility.

Hannah Critchlow is a neuroscientist and author of The 21st Century Brain (Torva)

Further reading

The Experience Machine: How Our Minds Predict and Shape Reality by Andy Clark (Penguin, £12.99)

Being You: A New Science of Consciousness by Anil Seth (Faber, £12.99)

The Art of Uncertainty: How to Navigate Chance, Ignorance, Risk and Luck by David Spiegelhalter (Pelican, £12.99)