Thank you for all the questions; including because you proved I am not nearly as good at thinking on my feet as I thought I was. I hope everyone enjoys the World Cup and that Scotland make a proper impact here. Enjoy the coverage ...

BobbiJane15: Clarkie and wee Billy Gilmour are both from Ayrshire. Can you think of a Burns quote that would give the team a boost?

That’s a brilliant question. And with family heritage there, I should have a smart answer. Unfortunately, I will have to leave for others, besides pointing out that if the Scotland team is even nearly as “prolific” as the national bard …

whatthatguysaid asks: Is Gilmour a big miss for Scotland, or would Clarke not have used him much anyway? I’m torn between loving having a classy ball player in the team, and being worried about him playing neat little passes only to find Grant Hanley is on the receiving end.

You are quite right to point out Clarke had a tendency not to use Gilmour when others expected he would (the Germany game in the last Euros an example). I just feel really sorry for the player; his Euro 2020/21 was ruined by Covid. It’s also fine to say the team can manage without him.

Dumbuck asks: As one who attended the Costa Rica debacle in Genoa in 1990, am I allowed to be scared shitless by the prospect of facing Haiti in our opening game?

Of course you are! I remember that day because, as a schoolboy, I placed a can of Irn-Bru in the freezer with a plan to drink it during the second half. I forgot all about the can, which exploded. You can imagine my mother’s delight at the subsequent state of the freezer.

Murdomania asks: I’ve dusted off my John Collier suit of 1978 (which served me well until 1982 – jacket, not the trousers by this point). What item of clothing will you be wearing to mark WC 2026?

It’s a shorts and T-shirt World Cup. Steaming hot. Everywhere.

Fran2016 asks: Is there anyone who has not been selected for the Scotland squad who you think was desperately unlucky to not make it? Or do you feel Clarke got his choices correct?

I think he called it all right. The big decision obviously came after Billy Gilnour was injured. Picking Tyler Fletcher ahead of Lennon Miller turned heads. Fletcher, to me, looks to have a really bright future and massively impressed experienced players during training sessions. I hope Miller responds to the point where Clarke cannot ignore him but, in the here and now, Fletcher to me looks the better player.

Kieron Bowie and Oli McBurnie had strong cases but I generally find it hard to grumble with the squad.

waefall asks: How seriously should we take Morocco? They’re my wildcard to go all the way, so I fear they could be even tougher than Brazil.

Very. But there is no question of anything else happening. In previous years – Costa Rica, Peru, Iran, Zaire – there was ignorance among Scotland players/staff/media about national teams we typically saw little of. That harmed Scotland. Now, there is so much information about opposition and, in Morocco’s case, a general understanding they are very good. I just think the position of that game is problematic for Scotland; I expect Morocco will be hungry for victory after an opening game loss to Brazil.

seanmcnulty asks: Do you agree with William McIlvanney about the connections between Scotland’s World Cup fiascoes and our political fiascoes, and snatching defeat from the jaws of victory becoming a national trait in the widest sense? If so, what’ll happen to us after we reach this year’s semis?

There are so many ways I could answer this … But a debate on the merits of Scottish independence isn’t something I’d rather enter into at this point. Generally I have always agreed with both McIlvanneys. I also think the current crop of Scottish international football players operate at a far more impressive level than Scotland’s current crop of politicians.

CogitoErgoSumAnxius asks: How much can Rangers expect to get for Lawrence Shankland once the slow-motion maestro finishes top scorer of the group stage having made a fool of Marquinhos?

This made me laugh. More intriguing to me is whether Rangers would have bought him. He was a no-brainer on a free transfer but would they have paid even £1m for him? I’m not so sure. But perhaps I am being sour …

His current form and mood will be a huge asset to Scotland. Suddenly it looks like Steve Clarke has a reliable goalscorer, who partners exceptionally well with Che Adams.

PeteTheBeat asks: In one office I worked in, we would make up tabloid names for certain games: England-Uruguay was for “The Fray Bentos Trophy” or Ireland Mexico being the Tricolour Derby.

What would we call Scotland v Haiti ?

Group C, both teams back at a World Cup after decades away. The Boston C Party? Sorry.

Chrisquinze asks: Which team is your true “dark horse”. ie not Turkey, Norway, Japan etc that keep getting mentioned?

You are robbing me of my Japanese obsession. Fair enough. Côte d’Ivoire.

JuiceSpritz asks: Will any team “take the knee” during the competition?

I genuinely haven’t heard that being talked about. So my sense is, no. But clearly we will have to wait and see.

bowboysammy asks: Do you have a pick for a player coming out of nowhere who amazes us?

It is very difficult for a player to come out of nowhere now. Touching on answer below, I really enjoy watching Japan and think they have a batch of attackers who are really exciting. My bet is one or more of them achieve big transfers on the back of this World Cup.

ayjaym asks: How far back in cleaning your social media profile did you have to go to get into the US?

I didn’t! Which is either the result of me coming to the US all the time to cover golf or a lack of interest in the corridors of power about my rantings towards Scottish referees.

RHConnon asks: Are you as disappointed (though not surprised) by the utter spinelessness of Fifa regarding, well, everything to do with this tournament as I am?

What is obvious is that their marketing budget was either too small or not appropriately used. If you look closely in the US, you will know the World Cup is happening. But you have to look closely. I’d suggest a key aim of a World Cup is to grab the attention of the host nation. That really doesn’t seem to have happened here. Yet, anyway.

OttoMaddox asks: What are the most promising group-stage games in terms of it actually being an entertaining game for the neutrals? Do any stick out?

I really enjoy watching Japan. That group has potential to be really entertaining, especially with the Dutch also involved. That also appears a pretty level/even section. A lot of the others have one or two noticeably weaker teams (in relative terms).

KTwoDJF asks: I know that there is technically a path to it, but what are the chances USA will be knocked out of the tournament by Iran ?

I have the USA being knocked out by Belgium. But I also have the USA winning their section; the mood in this country does not seem to suggest much confidence at all in that happening.

Mauberley asks: As a fellow Hearts fan, will you join me in saying well done to Lawrence Shankland for his big move.

The line is breaking up here, I can’t hear your question. Apologies.

richardinmadrid asks: Being a Scot, aged 69, and a football fan all my life, I really think Scotland will play awful against Haiti and play a great match against Brazil. What do you think of my premonition?

Yes, this isn’t a wild theory at all. I disagree though; I think Scotland have been wounded by failures in the last two finals. They have players a) with a point to prove over that and b) aware this will either be their best or last World Cup opportunity. So I actually believe they will seize the day against Haiti.

The Brazil fixture is dependent on whether they are comfortably through already or have incentive to damage Scotland. If there is nothing on it for Brazil, and knowing how the big nations manage their way through tournaments, I wouldn’t at all rule out Scotland taking a point.

3chordgenius asks: According to my Bracketology predictions Scotland will need to beat Germany, France, Spain, the Netherlands and Argentina to win the trophy, assuming they qualify as one of the best 3rd placers. How much do you recommend I invest in this outcome?

You could invest £20 to lose £20. My own predictions on the same Guardian page had Scotland losing to Mexico in the last 32. And my scenario added England plus Brazil to the possible opponents.

Lambchops asks: It’s a well known fact that Scotland’s group opponents never end up meeting their expectations in the World Cup? Having faced Ronaldo’s convulsive fits in France 98 what misfortunes may befall Brazil this time? Will the “curse” be lifted if Scotland make it out of the groups this time? And speaking of curses, should we actually just try and get WWE wrestler Danhausen to curse our opponents as he seems to be having some success with US sports teams?

Not a “curse” I have previously contemplated. The Netherlands did reach the final in 1978 … The historical comparisons for Scotland are fair but of course skewed. This team will generally be regarded as the greatest of all time should they emerge from group C, which a 2-0 win over Haiti and nothing else might be enough to secure. The Scotland team of 1974 didn’t reach the group phase but also didn’t lose a game. A glance at that squad and suggesting this team might be superior feels silly.

My wrestling interest ended in the days of Big Boss Man but I will take your word for it re: Danhausen.

Fearandloathingpart2 asks: Three right backs in the squad but no Max Johnston. Is he injured again, does he have the wrong attitude for Clarke, or does Clarke genuinely just rate Ralston higher?

I thought Johnston had a very difficult time when he came on in Copenhagen at the start of the World Cup campaign. Clarke is of course fiercely loyal and emphasises the club feel within this squad but I think the reality is he does rate Ralston higher. Hickey is by far and away the outstanding right back. Patterson needs a transfer from Everton to reignite his career and, like Johnston, is far better on the attacking elements from right back then he is defending.

misterbadexample asks: Well, I’ve put £50 on us at 28-1 to reach the semifinals, and I never gamble. Do you think the excitement at qualifying may have overexcited the nation?

That has ebbed and flowed. People were hugely excited at qualification. That mood dampened a little but noticeably in the following months. Yet the comeback to win against Curaçao and the 4-0 victory over Bolivia on Saturday has, I sense, boosted the mood again. You will lose your £50 but I think the last-32 is a legitimate, proper target.

DeJongandtherestless asks: Ewan, do you anticipate that the issue between Norway and Scotland will develop into a full-scale war at some point?

A wonderful story, largely because it is so utterly trivial. Norway are right to be irked about the late cancellation of a training game and the Scotland explanation doesn’t exactly tally. After all, Billy Gilmour was injured a week before they postponed the bounce game. However, the existence of the fixture wasn’t known publicly at all until the Norwegians made it that way. I also fail to see how it can significantly impact their build up.

There may be lingering Norwegian animosity of course. Scotland stole a late win in Oslo, which was key to qualification for the last Euros.

stooze asks: What do you think Scotland need to progress from the group - the minimum? I’m thinking 3 points and even a -2 GD might just scrape through.

Those who look at modelling suggest that will indeed be the borderline scenario. It’s a strange World Cup for Scotland in that it is so heavily based on game one. Without a win over Haiti – and I would argue a win by a couple of goals – the whole thing could fall flat within 90 minutes. I don’t fancy Morocco in game two after, I assume, they lose to Brazil. So I think Scotland have to win with a little to spare against Haiti then cling on for dear life.