惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

WordPress大学
WordPress大学
A
About on SuperTechFans
量子位
B
Blog RSS Feed
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
博客园_首页
MongoDB | Blog
MongoDB | Blog
小众软件
小众软件
Blog — PlanetScale
Blog — PlanetScale
Microsoft Azure Blog
Microsoft Azure Blog
V
V2EX
Google DeepMind News
Google DeepMind News
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
H
Hackread – Cybersecurity News, Data Breaches, AI and More
G
Google Developers Blog
U
Unit 42
D
DataBreaches.Net
博客园 - Franky
D
Docker
宝玉的分享
宝玉的分享
Y
Y Combinator Blog
月光博客
月光博客
freeCodeCamp Programming Tutorials: Python, JavaScript, Git & More
Hugging Face - Blog
Hugging Face - Blog

The New Stack | DevOps, Open Source, and Cloud Native News

Agentic development hinges on verification. For cloud-native software, that is a runtime problem. AI agents need infrastructure: Why Europe’s regional cloud strategy matters Transform your AI coding agent into a deterministic Java Spring expert WeAreDevelopers is coming to the US to give unsung developers a bigger voice Cleaner AI training data, fewer bugs: Sonar’s SonarSweep explained Observability overload is drowning engineers Google’s DiffusionGemma is 4x faster than its other Gemma models Fable 5: Guardrails and burn rate are annoying users, who say it’s still better than Opus 4.8 The Anthropic leader who built Claude Code says he ditched prompting — now he just writes loops. AWS can now mathematically prove your VMs are isolated Microsoft pulled 73 GitHub repos after malware attack — but still won’t say who’s compromised Databricks wants to kill the “email me a file” problem for AI agent skills Ramp bets forward deployed engineers can do what off-the-shelf finance AI can’t Git real: AI agents aren’t just for solo developers anymore Anthropic launches Claude Mythos/Fable 5, but you better try it soon Spring is 23 years old. AI just made it a security emergency. This AI agent startup ditched Anthropic for DeepSeek — and says it’s saving millions When your data model is the bottleneck: lessons from Medium’s feature store How long before we stop reading the code? The tokenmaxxing party is over, and Revenium is mopping up How AI is solving the memory crunch it created Microsoft’s pitch to enterprises: Ditch Azure Repos for GitHub, despite its rocky reliability record Claude Code’s biggest upgrade yet ran 5 agents at once — here’s what happened Why Anthropic just doubled Claude Cowork limits at no charge For years, Apache Cassandra handed this work to your team — 6.0 takes it back “A dangerous combination”: The 2 factors that can “corrupt” AI agent workflows With Foundry, Microsoft bets the enterprise AI battle is about reliability, not capability Microsoft unlocks Visual Studio for developers left behind by its own AI AI teams now deploy 1,000 times a month. Your pipeline wasn’t built for that. Microsoft just made the agent runtime free — and kept everything around it
The fix for soaring AI cloud bills exists — so why won’t ...
Jennifer Riggins · 2026-05-29 · via The New Stack | DevOps, Open Source, and Cloud Native News

To hear Yasmin Rajabi, chief operating officer at CloudBolt, tell it, there’s an imbalance in how we view automation. We’re happy to automate decisions that result in more productivity and processes — but what about when it comes to turning the dial to the left? For some reason, there’s hesitation there.

“Trust is super-high when it comes to traditional automation, but there’s still a lot of caution when it comes to right-sizing,” Rajabi tells The New Stack. “The same engineers who are deploying multiple times a day through CI/CD aren’t questioning [automation] anymore, but when it comes to delegating right-sizing to the machine, the bar to earn that trust is much higher.”

The data reveal why this imbalance might exist: When faced with the pressure to remain always-on, a higher cloud bill from over-provisioning seems worth the cost. But now that GPU-heavy AI workloads have sent cloud bills soaring, right-sizing automated processes has become a priority for 89% of organizations, according to the March 2026 CloudBolt Research Report.

And yet, 71% of Kubernetes engineers respond that they still require human review for resource optimization, with only 27% allowing CPU and memory changes to be auto-applied. So while the data shows it’s a priority, that motivation hasn’t shown up in the workflows.

“When it comes to delegating right-sizing to the machine, the bar to earn that trust is much higher.”

The New Stack will sit down with Rajabi and Reid Vandewiele, product lead at StormForge, at 9 a.m. Pacific/5 p.m. BST on Wednesday, June 24 to discuss the urgency of this right-sizing gap — especially when it comes to Kubernetes workloads for AI.

Join us live to not only learn how to measure your organization’s automation maturity, but to develop this trust over time, with strategic CPU throttling, out-of-memory (OOM) behavior, and, of course, rollback patterns. 

Register to join this conversation

Right-sizing is a multi-dimensional problem, Rajabi explains, spanning increasingly complex workloads in increasingly complex environments, so that when something goes wrong, it feels almost impossible to reverse. For this automation to work, this trust has to be built not just across teams but scaled across your organization.

“It takes a long time to build up trust in an automation solution, and it’s very fast to eliminate or significantly undermine that trust,” Rajabi warns. “It takes one production incident to take an application team from being willing to entertain automated resourcing to absolutely not, ‘not on my application, we’re special’.”

Join us June 24 to learn how to gain insight into how much your AI workloads actually cost, and to adopt a plan that takes the guesswork out of your provisioning.

YOUTUBE.COM/THENEWSTACK

Tech moves fast, don't miss an episode. Subscribe to our YouTube channel to stream all our podcasts, interviews, demos, and more.

Created with Sketch.