惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

T
Tenable Blog
Last Week in AI
Last Week in AI
P
Proofpoint News Feed
Engineering at Meta
Engineering at Meta
H
Help Net Security
F
Fortinet All Blogs
MyScale Blog
MyScale Blog
宝玉的分享
宝玉的分享
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
博客园 - 司徒正美
量子位
N
Netflix TechBlog - Medium
Apple Machine Learning Research
Apple Machine Learning Research
小众软件
小众软件
Recorded Future
Recorded Future
博客园 - 三生石上(FineUI控件)
Vercel News
Vercel News
aimingoo的专栏
aimingoo的专栏
I
InfoQ
Microsoft Security Blog
Microsoft Security Blog
Scott Helme
Scott Helme
The Last Watchdog
The Last Watchdog
cs.AI updates on arXiv.org
cs.AI updates on arXiv.org
IT之家
IT之家
AI
AI
WordPress大学
WordPress大学
Security Archives - TechRepublic
Security Archives - TechRepublic
Google Online Security Blog
Google Online Security Blog
U
Unit 42
V2EX - 技术
V2EX - 技术
MongoDB | Blog
MongoDB | Blog
Schneier on Security
Schneier on Security
博客园 - Franky
H
Heimdal Security Blog
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
Jina AI
Jina AI
W
WeLiveSecurity
P
Privacy & Cybersecurity Law Blog
Cloudbric
Cloudbric
B
Blog RSS Feed
N
News | PayPal Newsroom
S
Securelist
Threat Intelligence Blog | Flashpoint
Threat Intelligence Blog | Flashpoint
I
Intezer
Hacker News - Newest:
Hacker News - Newest: "LLM"
CTFtime.org: upcoming CTF events
CTFtime.org: upcoming CTF events
博客园_首页
罗磊的独立博客
H
Hackread – Cybersecurity News, Data Breaches, AI and More
雷峰网
雷峰网

LessWrong

CLR's Safe Pareto Improvements Research Agenda — LessWrong My Last 7 Blog Posts: a weekly round-up — LessWrong Quality Matters Most When Stakes are Highest — LessWrong If a room feels off the lighting is probably too "spiky" or too blue — LessWrong Stop AI Now — LessWrong Stupid Minutes Reevaluating "AGI Ruin: A List of Lethalities" in 2026 Who I Follow What's the LessWrongist philosophy of mathematics? MixedHTML Mode for Emacs Summarizing and Reviewing my earliest ML research paper, 7 years later Stop AI Resources for starting and growing an AI safety org There are only four skills: design, technical, management and physical Fifteen Years Aboard Arguments Should Be Decisive Criticisms — LessWrong The map is part of the territory — LessWrong “Best humans still outperform”: One turning point in the history of cope around artificial intelligence — LessWrong Society is a social construct, pace Arrow — LessWrong Consent-Based RL: Letting Models Endorse Their Own Training Updates — LessWrong AI #164: Pre Opus — LessWrong Publish-first writing — LessWrong What does status signalling do? When successful, what does it achieve? — LessWrong Let goodness conquer all that it can defend — LessWrong Why I'm Less of a Shill for Related Work Sections — LessWrong From Artificial Intelligence to an ecosystem of artificial life-forms. — LessWrong If You've Never Bought a Tool You Didn't Need, You're Not Buying Enough Tools — LessWrong Verify, but Trust — LessWrong Taking political violence seriously — LessWrong Against Doom & Pause AI — LessWrong Come to Manifest 2026! (June 12-14) — LessWrong How Big Tech Becomes Ungovernable — LessWrong Attempting to Quantify Chinese Bias in Open-Source LLMs — LessWrong A Research Bet on SAE-like Expert Architectures — LessWrong Church Planting: Lessons from the Comments — LessWrong On Dwarkesh Patel’s Podcast With Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang — LessWrong Anthropic Releases Opus 4.7 — LessWrong Specialization is a Driver of Natural Ontology — LessWrong You can only build safe ASI if ASI is globally banned — LessWrong Laptop stands are a thing your neck may appreciate — LessWrong Simulated Qualia Mugging — LessWrong You Aren't in Charge of the Overton Window; Politics Is Not Interior Design — LessWrong Post-Scarcity is bullshit — LessWrong Two Examples of Joy in the Seemingly Mundane — LessWrong How to run from a bull — LessWrong Carpathia Day — LessWrong Do not conquer what you cannot defend — LessWrong What economists get wrong (and sometimes right!) about AI — LessWrong Reflections of a Wordcel — LessWrong MAISU 2026 - Minimal AI Safety Unconference (April 24-27, online) — LessWrong Not a Goal. A Goal-like behavior. — LessWrong A visualization of changing AGI timelines, 2023 - 2026 — LessWrong What is the Iliad Intensive? — LessWrong LLM-tier personal computer security — LessWrong Beware of Well-Written Posts — LessWrong The Mirror Test Is Complicated — LessWrong Political Violence Is Never Acceptable — LessWrong AI Safety's Biggest Talent Gap Isn't Researchers. It's Generalists. — LessWrong Clique, Guild, Cult — LessWrong Your body is not a white box (and you're thinking about weight loss wrong) — LessWrong Counterintuitive Coin Toss. Part II — LessWrong An Ode to Humility and Curiosity in the New Machine Era [Hot take] Problems with AI prose You can’t trust violence — LessWrong The Blast Radius Principle — LessWrong On not being scared of math — LessWrong Why I'm excited about meta-models for interpretability — LessWrong The Ethics of AI-Assisted Creative Work — LessWrong How to make good tea — LessWrong Searchable explorer of EA Forum & LessWrong posts with explicit cruxes or "change my mind" content — LessWrong Constitutional AI vs. RLHF vs. Deliberative Alignment — LessWrong Eating meat is fine if you live in a simulation — LessWrong Tactics for Denying Your Motivations, or Why Legibility is Expensive — LessWrong Spectra of LSRDRs of the Okubo algebra — LessWrong Your Mom is a Chimera — LessWrong An apple picking model for AI R&D — LessWrong Dreams of the Future — LessWrong Pausing AI Is the Best Answer to Post-Alignment Problems — LessWrong Quick Thoughts About Mythos — LessWrong A permitted value of resting — LessWrong Scott Alexander gentrified my meetup — LessWrong Claude Interviews Me About Writing — LessWrong Catching illicit distributed training operations during an AI pause — LessWrong Proof Explained: Touchette-Lloyd Theorem — LessWrong 10% ≈ 90% — LessWrong Anthropic Shadow Realm (working notes) — LessWrong the Lazy Market Hypothesis — LessWrong Announcing ILIADIII: AENEID — LessWrong Have we already lost? Part 3: Reasons for Optimism — LessWrong Dario probably doesn't believe in superintelligence — LessWrong Why Nothing Ever Happens — LessWrong Could a single rogue AI destroy humanity? — LessWrong Hi. I am hbj. — LessWrong Getting Claude to rank the inkhaven bloggers — LessWrong Some thoughts on Nectome's risk and resilience — LessWrong The median take is taken — LessWrong If Mythos actually made Anthropic employees 4x more productive, I would radically shorten my timelines — LessWrong Biological Computing Underhang — LessWrong Claude Mythos #2: Cybersecurity and Project Glasswing — LessWrong The Unintelligibility is Ours: Notes on Chain-of-Thought — LessWrong
Short stories slow, long stories fast
Yair Halbers · 2026-04-23 · via LessWrong
A pattern I've noticed among authors I enjoy is that their short stories are often very sedately paced, with a lot of descriptive prose and not much action. But their long stories are peppered with fast dynamic scenes and they avoid detailed descriptions as much as they can get away with. This might seem counter intuitive. A short story has limited space to waste on flowery prose, whilst a long story gives you the space you need to flesh out the story. But the truth is that the core plot of even the lengthiest series can often be reduced to a few paragraphs [1] . Everything else is filler. e.g. Those who fanciest themselves the greatest of wizards often delve into ancient rites and forbidden arts, hoping that through heinous deeds they might gain incredible boons. Those who are sensible instead seek to understand the magic that already fills everyday life and its bonds. And so when Tom Riddle slew Lily Potter in front of the crib, where her baby son slept, he knew not what he had awoken. For one who gives their own life to protect another creates a guardian spell more powerful than any work of dread magic. Riddle's attempt to slay baby Harry rebounded and ripped Riddle apart, leaving Harry with nothing more than a lightning shaped scar on his forehead. The boy grew, went to school, learned magic, made friends. But Riddle was not dead, for he had split his soul with every murder he had committed, and bound each piece into an object. Whilst the object - the horcrux - yet stood, he could not be permanently destroyed. As foretold by prophecy, Harry and Riddle were bound to be enemies. Neither could live while the other survived. Helped by friends and teachers, Harry battled Riddle whenever he returned, and one by one hunted down the horcruxes and ground each of them down to dust. All but one. For on his 18th birthday, as the hordes of Riddle were closing in, greater and more numerous than ever before, Dumbledore, Harry's closest teacher and confidant revealed a terrible truth: the lightning scar on Harry's forehead was no ordinary wound, but rather marked the point where a piece of Riddle's soul had wormed it's way into Harry's. Harry was the last horcrux, and Riddle could not die whilst Harry yet lived. Harry bravely handed himself over to Riddle, who laughing, tortured and slew him, thereby making himself mortal. But once more Riddle underestimated the simple power of love, for by sacrificing himself Harry had made all those who yet stood against Riddle untouchable, and every spell that Riddle and his horde cast in the coming battle rebounded against them. The horde was routed and Riddle himself slain, and peace at last returned to the wizards of the world. I'm no Asimov or Scott Alexander, but I think that pretty much captures the overarching plot of Harry Potter, and doesn't do so in a way that makes it obvious anything essential is missing. By adding in more subplots and drama Rowling could have made the Harry Potter series any length from 6 paragraphs to 6000 volumes, without ever ending up with an incoherent or dissatisfying mess. The choice for what length she ultimately ended up with is purely about how much effort she wanted to put in, how much she wanted to say/explore, and dare I say it, what she thought would make her the most money. Long stories are a slave to attention. At some point in any book past a hundred pages, your reader will have to put down the book and go to work, and if you want them to open it when they come back you need them thinking about it the entire time. And you do that by throwing in plot twists and cliffhangers every couple of pages, so there's always some desperate plight your hero is stuck in which will worm it's way through your readers mind whilst he's attempting to fill in cells in a spreadsheet. A short story writer isn't a slave to such needs. They can try out different styles, write incredibly moving prose dwelling on the beauty of a sunset for ten pages, or just choose to flesh out their worldbuilding the entire time. In short they can write the story they actually want to write. If you want your story to be powerful and memorable, far easier with a short story than a long one. ^ Except for ASOIAF. But that's because ASOIAF doesn't have any plot past the first book, it's only got filler, which is why GRRM will never finish it. GRRM is just so good at filler that everyone reads it anyway. Discuss