惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

爱范儿
爱范儿
MyScale Blog
MyScale Blog
Recent Announcements
Recent Announcements
N
Netflix TechBlog - Medium
GbyAI
GbyAI
Vercel News
Vercel News
The GitHub Blog
The GitHub Blog
阮一峰的网络日志
阮一峰的网络日志
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
V
Visual Studio Blog
Martin Fowler
Martin Fowler
腾讯CDC
大猫的无限游戏
大猫的无限游戏
aimingoo的专栏
aimingoo的专栏
云风的 BLOG
云风的 BLOG
J
Java Code Geeks
WordPress大学
WordPress大学
P
Proofpoint News Feed
雷峰网
雷峰网
酷 壳 – CoolShell
酷 壳 – CoolShell
有赞技术团队
有赞技术团队
人人都是产品经理
人人都是产品经理
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
Y
Y Combinator Blog

Futurism

Man Creates Tiny Submarine for His Parakeet to Experience Life Underwater The Effects of AI-Generated Code Tearing Through Corporations Is Actually Kind of Funny Trump Hires Orbital Towing Company to Build Space Interceptors Psychologists Found Something Horrible About the Kind of Men Seeking Trad Wives To Get Swole, Teens Are Pumping Themselves Full of Drugs Meant for Fattening Cows for the Slaughterhouse Foolish Pollsters Are Now Just Asking AI What Voters Would Say in Response to Questions and Publishing It at Face Value OpenAI Says It’s Already Made $100 Million by Stuffing ChatGPT With Ads Man Punished for Breaking Into Moo Deng’s Zoo Enclosure AI Is Causing Healthcare Costs to Surge There’s a Mass Rebellion Against AI in the Workplace People Who Lose Their Job to AI Are in for a World of Pain, Goldman Sachs Report Finds OpenAI Says Not to Worry About UBI, Because It Has Another Idea Police Officer Helplessly Waves Arms at Waymo That Careened Wrong Way Through Whataburger Drive-Thru Someone Just Threw a Molotov Cocktail At Sam Altman’s House New York Times Makes Substantial Changes to Article That Glazed a Sleazy AI Startup: “Our Piece Should Have Included That Information” Space Scientists Wince as Astronauts’ Lives Depend on Artemis 2’s Controversial Heat Shield During Plunge Back to Earth The Moon Astronauts Have Been Working Out With a NASA Rowing Machine in Space First AI Model From Zuckerberg’s Wildly Expensive Superintelligence Lab Flops Compared to Virtually All Rivals Economists Starting to Admit They May Have Been Wrong About AI Never Replacing Human Jobs AI-Powered Drug Marketer Medvi Responds After Allegations About Fake Doctors and Patients As Astronauts Visit the Moon, NASA Insider Says Agency Is in Shambles Behind the Scenes Man Lights 1.2 Million Square Foot Warehouse on Fire for Not Paying Him Enough NASA Scientists Screamed With Delight When They Saw Something Smashing Into the Moon Google Says Showing Polymarket Bets on Google News Was a Mistake Las Vegas Sphere Turns Into Huge Moon to Celebrate NASA Mission The New York Times Says It’s Identified the Creator of Bitcoin We Talked to a Writer Accused of Publishing An AI-Generated Essay in The New York Times Naked Man Bursts Into Tesla Service Center With a Shotgun Student Dies When Hospital Has No ICU Doctors, Calls One on Videochat Who Pronounces Him Dead Remotely, Lawsuit Claims Analysis Finds That Google’s AI Overviews Are Providing Misinformation at a Scale Possibly Unprecedented in the History of Human Civilization
Physicists Have a Major Problem With the Universe
Victor Tange · 2026-04-18 · via Futurism

Illustration shows an abstract representation of the universe.

Getty / Futurism

Sign up to see the future, today

Can’t-miss innovations from the bleeding edge of science and tech

Almost a century ago, famed astronomer Edwin Hubble determined that the universe is expanding at an accelerating rate. The further away galaxies were from Earth, he found, the faster they appeared to be moving away from us.

It was an elegant observation that undergirds much of today’s cosmology. But nailing down the exact relationship between the distance of celestial objects and how fast they recede from us remains one of the most significant challenges in modern astronomy. Specifically, the precise expansion rate of the universe — called the Hubble constant — has turned into a major pain point as attempts to nail it down keep leading to widely differing figures.

One issue is that when scientists calculate what the Hubble constant should be, it doesn’t quite match observations of the actual universe. Even worse, different sensitive devices designed to measure it down keep disagreeing with each other. The problem is so significant that it has its own name: the Hubble tension.

Now, an international team of astronomers say they’ve produced one of the most precise measurements of the Hubble constant to date, which they say brings us a small step closer to addressing this glaring discrepancy — and potentially answering some of the most fundamental questions that remain surrounding the nature of the universe, such as its true age.

As detailed in a paper published in the journal Astronomy & Astrophysics, the team identified a specific value of the Hubble constant of around 73.5 kilometers per second per megaparsec (roughly 3.26 million light-years.) While it may be a step in the right direction, the latest findings also serve to highlight just how much top scientists are struggling to resolve the tension. It’s a morass that raises the possibility that we’re deeply misunderstanding something, or that the universe may be ruled by laws of physics that we still haven’t discovered.

“The prevailing cosmological model predicts that the Hubble constant should be ten percent smaller than we measure directly,” lead author and Space Telescope Science Institute scientist Stefano Casertano told Phys.org. “This is known as the Hubble tension, and the difference is more than five times the combined uncertainty of both models and measurements.”

Previous attempts to arrive at the precise value of the Hubble constant have had varying results. To unify these measurements into a single number, the team “developed a statistical framework to properly combine all of these measurements together, and to identify any possible inconsistencies,” as coauthor and fellow Space Telescope Science Institute scientist Adam Riess told the publication.

“This is the most precise measurement to date, achieving one percent accuracy for the first time,” Casertano added. “We also found that no single measurement or thread is critical to this result; any component can be eliminated entirely, and the value of the Hubble constant remains essentially unchanged.”

While honing in on a more precise value for the Hubble constant is an important step forward, plenty of work remains.

“Confirming the Hubble tension makes it even more important for us to reexamine the foundations of the current cosmological model, and to identify any new phenomena that might modify the evolution of the universe,” Riess told Phys.org.

“This work effectively rules out explanations of the Hubble tension that rely on a single overlooked error in local distance measurements,” the scientists concluded in their paper. “If the tension is real, as the growing body of evidence suggests, it may point to new physics beyond the standard cosmological model.”

More on the Hubble tension: Our Entire Galaxy Appears to Be Embedded in a Colossal Sheet of Dark Matter