惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

IT之家
IT之家
Last Week in AI
Last Week in AI
博客园_首页
酷 壳 – CoolShell
酷 壳 – CoolShell
博客园 - 叶小钗
大猫的无限游戏
大猫的无限游戏
人人都是产品经理
人人都是产品经理
V
Visual Studio Blog
宝玉的分享
宝玉的分享
博客园 - Franky
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
月光博客
月光博客
T
Tailwind CSS Blog
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
量子位
博客园 - 聂微东
S
SegmentFault 最新的问题
博客园 - 司徒正美
罗磊的独立博客
V
V2EX
freeCodeCamp Programming Tutorials: Python, JavaScript, Git & More
美团技术团队
小众软件
小众软件
Jina AI
Jina AI

Scientific American

Former deputy surgeon general Erica Schwartz nominated as new CDC chief NASA Artemis II astronauts say thank you to the world Congress grills RFK, Jr., about vaccines and cuts to health budget How the Grand Canyon formed is a surprisingly messy story. Here's the latest clue How far from humanity were the astronauts of Artemis II? The answer will surprise you Effect of antiamyloid Alzheimer’s drugs ‘absent or trivial,’ Cochrane review finds The Trump administration is looking to experts to weigh in on peptides When a naked mole rat queen dies, that usually means war—but not for this colony NASA needs nuclear power for its moon base. Here’s the White House plan to get it Why do older people have fewer seasonal allergies? 250-million-year-old fossil proves mammal ancestors laid eggs A face-swapping illusion can unlock childhood memories 30 years of Pokémon—how the Japanese franchise mirrors real-world science Sperm whales may make their own vowel sounds, similar to human language Colombia will euthanize Pablo Escobar’s invasive ‘cocaine hippos’ NASA’s Artemis III will pit SpaceX against Blue Origin The East Coast could see blazing hot temperatures this week. Here’s why Scientists just discovered 5.6 million bees under a New York State cemetery The real science of Pokémon How chemists engineer the signature smells of luxury perfumes How two mathematicians solved a cryptography mystery The engineering marvels hidden inside six-figure watches Expensive versus affordable binoculars—what’s the difference? How physicists found a new type of magnet hiding in plain sight A hot pair of supplements, creatine and methylene blue dye, may not work together Unlikely paths to discovery The baffling ecological disaster that's killing America’s freshwater mussels Poem: ‘How I Became a Spitfire Pilot during My Cataract Operation’ DARPA built an AI to fact-check enemy weapons claims Mathematicians created an ‘impossible’ shape that shouldn’t exist
Hegseth says U.S. military no longer requires flu vaccina...
2026-04-22 · via Scientific American

April 21, 2026

2 min read

Google Logo Add Us On GoogleAdd SciAm

The decision to no longer enforce mandatory annual flu shots for military personnel could mean more troops will get sick during flu season, one expert says

By Jackie Flynn Mogensen edited by Claire Cameron

Pete Hegseth at a podium

U.S. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth speaks during a press briefing at the Pentagon in Washington, D.C., on April 16, 2026.

SAUL LOEB/AFP/Getty Images

Updated

April 21, 2026

at

5:15 PM

The U.S. military will no longer require service members to be vaccinated against the flu, Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth said in a social media post on Tuesday, a decision that some health experts say could endanger troops.

“The War Department is once again restoring freedom to our Joint Force. We are discarding the mandatory flu vaccine requirement, effective immediately,” Hegseth wrote in the post.

The policy stands in contrast to the current recommendations of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the country’s highest public health body, which says all Americans over the age of six months who do not have contraindications should get the annual flu shot. The CDC estimates that the vaccine saved some 12,000 lives and prevented about 180,000 hospitalizations during the 2024–2025 flu season.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


“Flu vaccines are the best tools we have to protect people from severe disease,” says Jennifer Nuzzo, a professor of epidemiology at Brown University. The vaccine might not always prevent the flu, but it effectively lowers the risk of hospitalization and severe disease, she explains.

It's also a matter of national security, experts say. “I can’t understand why you would make this decision if troop readiness was important,” says Michael Osterholm, director of the Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy at the University of Minnesota. The data behind the flu vaccine are “clear and compelling” on both safety and the vaccine’s ability to reduce serious illness hospitalizations and deaths, he says. “The data have been repeatedly confirmed to show that across all ages.”

“This is an irresponsible decision that will undermine the medical readiness of our troops,” says Georges Benjamin, CEO of the American Public Health Association. “[Hegseth] clearly demonstrates his unfitness to command our nation’s military forces.”

“In the military, vaccination is not political theater. It is force protection. Troops live and work in close quarters, where influenza can spread quickly and sideline otherwise healthy service members,” Richard Ricciardi, a professor at the George Washington University School of Nursing, who served in the U.S. Army for more than three decades, told CNN.

Notably, some of the first reported U.S. cases of flu during the 1918 pandemic were in soldiers from Kansas who carried the virus with them into their camp, where it then is believed to have spread to the rest of the country and on to the rest of the world.

“If fewer military personnel are vaccinated against the flu, it would likely mean more troops getting sick during the flu season, which would compromise the battle readiness of our armed forces and increase the health care costs that the U.S. government pays,” Nuzzo says. “With an increasing number of global engagements that seems like a particularly shortsighted policy.”

Editor’s Note (4/21/26): This is a breaking news story and will be updated.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.