June 16, 2026
Describing the characteristics of short-lived astrophysical events
Jessine Hein
Join Our Community of Science Lovers!
In high school Anna Ho became so fascinated with neuroscience that she wrote to neurologist and author Oliver Sacks, asking whether he needed an intern. A representative for Sacks politely declined, she recalls, but encouraged her to pursue her passions. She did, and it led her on a transformative journey into space science.
Ho is now an assistant professor at Cornell University working on astronomical transients—brief, often violent events that flare into view and then vanish on timescales of months, days or even minutes. She uses telescopes spanning the electromagnetic spectrum on the ground and in space to study these objects before they disappear.
On supporting science journalism
If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.
These objects are given unwieldy labels such as “luminous fast blue optical transients”—flashes of brilliant blue far brighter and briefer than a typical supernova—but they’re better known by the whimsical names Ho and other scientists assign to them. There is the Cow (named after its official designation, AT2018cow), a burst some 100 times brighter than a supernova that dimmed in just a few days instead of the usual weeks.
Jeffery DelViscio
And there is the Tasmanian Devil (AT2022tsd), which repeatedly flared brighter than an exploding star for mere minutes at a time—something that left Ho “stunned beyond words” when she first saw it. “I’ll remember that for a long time,” she says. “That was probably the most surprised I think I’ve ever been in my profession.”
Discovering astronomical transients requires rapid mobilization among collaborators at observatories around the world. Ho’s ability to pull off these campaigns is renowned among her colleagues. What she and her collaborators have observed tells us more about how matter and energy propagate through extreme environments.
The result is a deeper understanding of how massive stars live and die—and more work to do. “Right now I would say that my work has raised more questions than it has answered!” Ho says.
This article is part of “The Young American Scientists,” an editorially independent project that was produced with financial support from Regeneron.
It’s Time to Stand Up for Science
If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.
I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.
If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.
In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.
There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.