惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

V
V2EX
Y
Y Combinator Blog
博客园_首页
V
Visual Studio Blog
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
阮一峰的网络日志
阮一峰的网络日志
Hugging Face - Blog
Hugging Face - Blog
宝玉的分享
宝玉的分享
B
Blog
博客园 - 三生石上(FineUI控件)
小众软件
小众软件
WordPress大学
WordPress大学
L
LangChain Blog
爱范儿
爱范儿
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
P
Proofpoint News Feed
Blog — PlanetScale
Blog — PlanetScale
C
Check Point Blog
博客园 - 聂微东
云风的 BLOG
云风的 BLOG
Microsoft Security Blog
Microsoft Security Blog
博客园 - 叶小钗
酷 壳 – CoolShell
酷 壳 – CoolShell
H
Help Net Security

Scientific American

Former deputy surgeon general Erica Schwartz nominated as new CDC chief NASA Artemis II astronauts say thank you to the world Congress grills RFK, Jr., about vaccines and cuts to health budget How the Grand Canyon formed is a surprisingly messy story. Here's the latest clue How far from humanity were the astronauts of Artemis II? The answer will surprise you Effect of antiamyloid Alzheimer’s drugs ‘absent or trivial,’ Cochrane review finds The Trump administration is looking to experts to weigh in on peptides When a naked mole rat queen dies, that usually means war—but not for this colony NASA needs nuclear power for its moon base. Here’s the White House plan to get it Why do older people have fewer seasonal allergies? 250-million-year-old fossil proves mammal ancestors laid eggs A face-swapping illusion can unlock childhood memories 30 years of Pokémon—how the Japanese franchise mirrors real-world science Sperm whales may make their own vowel sounds, similar to human language Colombia will euthanize Pablo Escobar’s invasive ‘cocaine hippos’ NASA’s Artemis III will pit SpaceX against Blue Origin The East Coast could see blazing hot temperatures this week. Here’s why Scientists just discovered 5.6 million bees under a New York State cemetery The real science of Pokémon How chemists engineer the signature smells of luxury perfumes How two mathematicians solved a cryptography mystery The engineering marvels hidden inside six-figure watches Expensive versus affordable binoculars—what’s the difference? How physicists found a new type of magnet hiding in plain sight A hot pair of supplements, creatine and methylene blue dye, may not work together Unlikely paths to discovery The baffling ecological disaster that's killing America’s freshwater mussels Poem: ‘How I Became a Spitfire Pilot during My Cataract Operation’ DARPA built an AI to fact-check enemy weapons claims Mathematicians created an ‘impossible’ shape that shouldn’t exist
Americans’ trust in the CDC has plummeted since 2025, new...
Jackie Flynn Mogensen · 2026-06-10 · via Scientific American

A mere 12 percent of Americans say they trust the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s recommendations “a great deal”

RFK, Jr., at a podium

Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., conducts a news conference to discuss a survey from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Autism and Developmental Disabilities Monitoring (ADDM) Network on April 16, 2025.

Tom Williams/Getty Images

Join Our Community of Science Lovers!

Americans’ trust in the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has nose-dived during President Donald Trump’s second term, a new poll from Harvard University and the de Beaumont Foundation found. Just 50 percent of respondents said they trust health recommendations from the CDC at all—a steep drop from 77 percent who said they trusted the CDC in 2025.

Since last year’s poll was conducted, the Trump administration has overhauled U.S. health and science agencies. Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., has fired longtime agency vaccine scientists, while multiple senior leadership figures at the CDC, as well as other health agencies, have resigned or accused Kennedy of pushing them out. The CDC has also stopped coordinating closely with international public health agencies, such as the World Health Organization, and sought to reduce the number of recommended vaccines for children. And the Department of Health and Human Services has altered the U.S. food pyramid to encourage Americans to eat more red meat. (Some of these moves have been challenged in court.)

All of these changes have been criticized by public health experts, researchers and medical and science associations as endangering the health of Americans, especially children.


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


The new poll included about 2,200 adults and was conducted between March 19 and April 1, 2026. Democrats and Independents have particularly lost faith in the CDC: just 34 percent of Democrats and 47 percent of Independents said they “somewhat” trust the agency’s recommendations, down from 92 percent and 77 percent in 2025, respectively. Meanwhile about 67 percent of Republicans said they trust the agency—up from 63 percent in 2025.

Other wings of HHS also saw low levels of trust in 2026: Just 53 percent of poll respondents trust the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the National Institutes of Health to improve health. HHS did not immediately respond to a request for comment from Scientific American.

When the poll’s authors asked participants about their support for changes at the U.S. health agencies under the current administration, 86 percent of Democrats said they “disapprove” of agency actions. Republicans, on the other hand, overwhelmingly said they “approve” of the changes (with 80 percent in favor). Still, the majority of all adults, about 60 percent, said the U.S. government has gone too far in cuts to research.

Americans haven’t lost all trust in medical professionals themselves, however. Nurses, doctors and pharmacists, as well as health groups such as the American Heart Association (AHA) and American Cancer Society (ACS), had the broad support of 80 percent or more of respondents.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.