惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

T
Threatpost
Exploit-DB.com RSS Feed
Exploit-DB.com RSS Feed
S
Security Affairs
N
News and Events Feed by Topic
T
Tenable Blog
P
Proofpoint News Feed
W
WeLiveSecurity
Simon Willison's Weblog
Simon Willison's Weblog
Google DeepMind News
Google DeepMind News
C
CERT Recently Published Vulnerability Notes
Help Net Security
Help Net Security
I
Intezer
T
Threat Research - Cisco Blogs
S
Secure Thoughts
C
Cyber Attacks, Cyber Crime and Cyber Security
L
Lohrmann on Cybersecurity
AWS News Blog
AWS News Blog
Google Online Security Blog
Google Online Security Blog
cs.AI updates on arXiv.org
cs.AI updates on arXiv.org
Know Your Adversary
Know Your Adversary
Project Zero
Project Zero
The Hacker News
The Hacker News
Security Archives - TechRepublic
Security Archives - TechRepublic
T
Tor Project blog
N
News | PayPal Newsroom
cs.CL updates on arXiv.org
cs.CL updates on arXiv.org
Hacker News - Newest:
Hacker News - Newest: "LLM"
A
Arctic Wolf
Forbes - Security
Forbes - Security
O
OpenAI News
K
KPMG report finds enterprise disconnect between AI and its ROI | CIO
Security Latest
Security Latest
P
Palo Alto Networks Blog
S
Schneier on Security
S
Securelist
C
Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency CISA
H
Heimdal Security Blog
V
Vulnerabilities – Threatpost
www.infosecurity-magazine.com
www.infosecurity-magazine.com
博客园_首页
T
Troy Hunt's Blog
Latest news
Latest news
Recent Announcements
Recent Announcements
MyScale Blog
MyScale Blog
人人都是产品经理
人人都是产品经理
L
LINUX DO - 热门话题
M
MIT News - Artificial intelligence
N
Netflix TechBlog - Medium
V
Visual Studio Blog
H
Hacker News: Front Page

Scientific American

Former deputy surgeon general Erica Schwartz nominated as new CDC chief NASA Artemis II astronauts say thank you to the world Congress grills RFK, Jr., about vaccines and cuts to health budget How the Grand Canyon formed is a surprisingly messy story. Here's the latest clue How far from humanity were the astronauts of Artemis II? The answer will surprise you Effect of antiamyloid Alzheimer’s drugs ‘absent or trivial,’ Cochrane review finds The Trump administration is looking to experts to weigh in on peptides When a naked mole rat queen dies, that usually means war—but not for this colony NASA needs nuclear power for its moon base. Here’s the White House plan to get it Why do older people have fewer seasonal allergies? 250-million-year-old fossil proves mammal ancestors laid eggs A face-swapping illusion can unlock childhood memories 30 years of Pokémon—how the Japanese franchise mirrors real-world science Sperm whales may make their own vowel sounds, similar to human language Colombia will euthanize Pablo Escobar’s invasive ‘cocaine hippos’ NASA’s Artemis III will pit SpaceX against Blue Origin The East Coast could see blazing hot temperatures this week. Here’s why Scientists just discovered 5.6 million bees under a New York State cemetery The real science of Pokémon How chemists engineer the signature smells of luxury perfumes How two mathematicians solved a cryptography mystery The engineering marvels hidden inside six-figure watches Expensive versus affordable binoculars—what’s the difference? How physicists found a new type of magnet hiding in plain sight A hot pair of supplements, creatine and methylene blue dye, may not work together Unlikely paths to discovery The baffling ecological disaster that's killing America’s freshwater mussels Poem: ‘How I Became a Spitfire Pilot during My Cataract Operation’ DARPA built an AI to fact-check enemy weapons claims Mathematicians created an ‘impossible’ shape that shouldn’t exist How cosmic rays are helping mining companies find critical minerals underground New evidence links heart disease to inflammation—and drugs can stop it An asteroid extinguished all the dinosaurs except for birds. Here’s why Math Puzzle: A disassembly job May 2026: Science History from 50, 100 and 150 Years Ago Readers respond to the January 2026 issue How to build a space hotel The humble ham sandwich inspired a math theorem for sharing food fairly Imperiled ‘cloud jaguar’ spotted in Honduran mountains for the first time in a decade Person functionally cured of HIV after bone marrow transplant from sibling Dream Chaser space plane faces uncertain future in NASA’s push for the moon Bizarre ‘compleximers’ break the rules of both glass and plastic This method to reverse cellular aging is about to be tested in humans The Artemis II mission worked—but should we really keep returning to the moon? How DNA forensics is transforming studies of ancient manuscripts Beetle larvae mimic flower scents to attract bee hosts See NASA’s Artemis II mission around the moon in 12 stunning photos New study shows how the brain weighs evidence to make decisions What NASA’s Artemis II tells us about the ‘overview effect,’ moon joy and awe New metal with triple copper’s heat conduction challenges fundamental physics NASA’s Artemis II reveals why humans still love the moon NASA’s Artemis II moon mission splashes down The Expanse authors James S. A. Corey explore alien war in new book The Faith of Beasts New particle mass measurement deepens quantum mystery NASA’s Artemis II crew returns today—here’s what to know ahead of splashdown Why bombing Iran’s nuclear power plant could cause an environmental disaster Mysterious heart neurons maintain blood pressure to prevent fainting NASA’s Dragonfly mission will send a nuclear-powered flying drone to Titan This sci‑fi twist on Moby-Dick will blow your mind Medieval aurora poetry provided clues to historic solar storms White House budget puts 54 NASA science missions on the chopping block NASA’s Artemis II moon mission is on track for Friday splashdown Timeline of the Artemis II moon mission’s return to Earth Why can’t humans regenerate limbs? New research offers a clue How the wildlife trade boosts the chance of a disease jumping from animals to humans Two hundred chimpanzees are embroiled in a ‘civil war’ NASA’s Artemis II moon mission preps for its last full day in space How China could still win the new moon race Lyme disease is spreading, but a new vaccine could curb infections No, Shroud of Turin DNA analysis doesn't show relic's origins, experts say What’s the deal with the Artemis II music? The crew finally gave us some answers The world’s deepest sensors will detect earthquakes around the world from far below Antarctica Why Artemis II’s reentry may be the moon mission’s greatest challenge yet NASA’s Artemis II moon mission is focusing on its return to Earth What is the quantum ‘Ghost Murmur’ purportedly used in Iran? Scientists question CIA’s claim of long-range heartbeat detection How well GLP-1 weight loss drugs work may depend on your genetics NASA’s Artemis moon missions are a game changer for astronomy Tracking Artemis II—after its historic lunar flyby, NASA’s moon mission heads home NASA’s Artemis program has sparked a race to land U.S. rovers on the moon Do people see robots as having race? New studies clash as humanoids enter the real world Health experts warn of rising measles cases in undervaccinated communities In a first, Artemis II moon mission astronauts make ‘ship to ship’ call to ISS The mathematically correct way to slice a pizza See NASA’s Artemis II mission’s first incredible photos of the moon, Earth and a total solar eclipse In an echo of Apollo 8, NASA’s Artemis II astronauts witness stunning ‘Earthrise’ and ‘Earthset’ NASA’s Artemis II astronauts celebrate epic lunar flyby with stunning new images NASA’s Artemis era may finally solve three major moon mysteries NASA’s Artemis II ‘free return’ trajectory lets gravity do the driving Trump speaks with NASA's Artemis II astronauts after historic moon flyby NASA’s Artemis II crew experience total solar eclipse from space NASA’s Artemis II moon mission reaches greatest distance from Earth NASA’s Artemis II astronauts break Apollo’s distance record Watch live—NASA’s Artemis II’s moon flyby is underway Bypass the Strait of Hormuz with nuclear explosives? The U.S. studied that option in the 1960s NASA’s Artemis II mission is about to pass behind the moon NASA’s Artemis II, endangered species and oil, low western U.S. snowpack Where is Artemis II? NASA astronauts near the moon for first time in more than 50 years NASA’s Artemis II laser communications system is beaming 4K video from the moon NASA’s Artemis II moon mission is gearing up for its lunar flyby What will NASA’s Artemis II astronauts see on the moon?
Do you need more protein? What science says about high-protein diets
2026-05-13 · via Scientific American

Rachel Feltman: For Scientific American’s Science Quickly, I’m Rachel Feltman.

Go into any grocery store these days and you’ll see plenty of food-related fads, both new and old, being used to hawk products: You’ve got your paleo ketchups, gut-microbe-friendly sodas, and, my personal favorite, plant-based chips that are none-too-subtly billed as mimicking the singular taste of a Cool Ranch Dorito. But one of today’s biggest nutritional buzzwords is actually kind of basic: protein.

Influencers say we’re not getting enough, food marketers want us to know they’ve got it, and Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., seems to think more meat could do us all some good. But what does the science actually say about this buzzy macronutrient?


On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Here to tell us more is science journalist Bethany Brookshire, the author of a recent story on SciAm about this wave of protein enthusiasm.

Bethany, thanks so much for coming on to chat with us today.

Bethany Brookshire: Thank you for having me.

Feltman: So we’re here to talk about protein.

Brookshire: [Laughs.]

Feltman: Why, why are we talking about protein so much? Why is it everywhere? Are we getting enough? What’s happening? Could you just start us with, with your—a brief overview of your thoughts? [Laughs.]

Brookshire: [Laughs.] Having, having just written a carefully reported piece on protein, when people are, like, asking me, “What’s up with protein?,” my honest answer is, “I wish I knew.” I really do.

Feltman: [Laughs.]

Brookshire: There is a recent—and when I say recent, past 10, 15 years, it’s kind of been building—this idea that we need to get more protein ...

Feltman: Mm-hmm.

Brookshire: That we’re not getting enough protein, that somehow we desperately need this and we could be our absolute best selves if we just hit the meat harder. And [Laughs] ...

Feltman: Oh, what a phrase, but please do go on. [Laughs.]

Brookshire: [Laughs.] I do my best.

And it’s interesting because it has been embraced particularly by the “Make America Healthy Again” movement. Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., who is the current secretary for health and human services, when he unveiled his new upside-down food pyramid declared that “we are ending the war on protein.”

I am unsure of the genesis or reality of that particular conflict, don’t think anybody ever thought we were in a war on protein. [Laughs.] But there is kind of an idea in some wellness spaces that one of the things we all could stand to get more of is protein, and that’s kind of been growing over the past 10 to 15 years.

It started, as many of these wellness trends start, in the fitness and bodybuilding spaces ...

Feltman: Mm.

Brookshire: And has now become much more widespread, to the point that you can go to a coffee shop and get protein-boosted cold foam on top of your latte, which is also protein-boosted.

Feltman: Right, well, and I’m glad you mention the idea of, like, protein-boosted products because, you know, one of the results of this obsession with protein is a lot of, for lack of a better term, sort of proteinwashing and a lot of focus on putting as impressive a number of protein per serving as you can on the front of a bag of something. What has your reporting told you about sort of how customers are responding to that?

Brookshire: I have not actually looked specifically into how customers respond to it. I can tell you, I did run a taste test of a certain very popular toaster pastry in its regular and protein-boosted forms amongst an n of 12 of various ages, genders, and etcetera. I can tell you that the vast majority—and when I say vast majority, I mean 11 out of my n of 12—preferred the regular pastry to the protein-boosted pastry. The one person who did prefer the protein-boosted pastry now is in possession of the rest of them, so. [Laughs.]

Feltman: [Laughs.]

Brookshire: It definitely can create—it depends on the product. Most of the products that I’ve come across are boosted with whey protein, which is derived from milk, and that can sometimes mess with the texture of something.

Feltman: Right.

Brookshire: And so often people find that different texture to be a little unusual or not what they’re expecting. And so that’s often what people react to when they’re reacting to a protein boost in a product.

Feltman: And so what does the data actually tell us about how much protein we need and how much people are getting, on average?

Brookshire: So this is interesting. [Laughs.] This is one of the more interesting things that I’ve come across kind of in my reporting. There is significant discussion among experts, among groups, as to how much protein we do need per day and whether or not we are getting enough of it based on those numbers. So if you're willing to nerd out with me for a hot second.

Feltman: [Laughs.]Of course.

Brookshire: Okay. So we can start with what the base absolute basement amount of protein. Because let's be clear, there are three, four basic nutrients that you need. Okay? It is protein, carbohydrates, fat and water, whether water counts as a nutrient. Eh. Anyway, you need those four things to make the chemicals in your cells and allow you to function, right?

You can get by without any carbs in your diet. You can. Your body can convert the rest of that. You can get by on a very, very low-fat diet. Your body can make up that difference. You cannot get by with no protein in your diet. You do need some protein in your diet. In particular, we utilize 20 amino acids in our daily cellular lives. Nine of those are essential amino acids, which means that we cannot physically make them ourselves—we have to get them from our diet. So we do need some protein.

Feltman: As one of my favorite short stories puts it, we are made of meat.

Brookshire: We are absolutely made of meat. [Laughs.] If by “meat,” you mean protein, then yes, we are made of meat. We are nothing but meat sacks. And so we do require protein in our diets.

How much of that is actually somewhat up for debate. So they did some studies in the 1980s, basically, where they took people and they gave them varying amounts of protein and then they saw how much of it they peed out. Because the idea is that your body seeks equilibrium. It will take that protein and use as much as it needs and then just excrete the rest—like, bye.

And based on those studies the estimated average requirement, the EAR, of the absolute basement protein you need to remain in homeostasis is roughly 0.6 grams per kilogram per day, okay?

Feltman: Okay.

Brookshire: So then when they were coming up with recommended daily allowances in the U.S., they were like, “We just wanna make sure everybody gets over 0.6, right, so we’re gonna say 0.8,” right? You get 0.8, you are definitely safe.

Feltman: Good buffer, yeah.

Brookshire: Right. Now people are questioning that, and they’re questioning it because that is the maintenance, right? That’s how much you get to maintain what you currently have. Is that the goal, right?

Feltman: Right.

Brookshire: Are we ...

Feltman: A lot of us are trying to get shredded ...

Brookshire: Right.

Feltman: Every day.

Brookshire: Are we trying to get up on the gains? And if that’s the case, you need more protein.

Also, there are some groups that do not get enough. To be clear there is no evidence that the population at large, your average human being, is not getting enough protein. We’re getting plenty. Most people are getting more [Laughs], up to [about] 50 percent more protein, than they actually need on a daily basis.

The groups that nutritionists are concerned about are, in particular, the elderly. So people who are elderly can often suffer from something called sarcopenia, aka muscle wasting. And they need more protein, but those people also have very strong long-term reductions in appetite, right? So they’re just not eating a lot of calories. And if you’re not eating a lot of calories, the proportion of protein in your diet needs to be higher.

Another group that some of the scientists I spoke to were slightly concerned about is people on GLP-1 drugs. Again, because you get huge reductions in appetite—really, really drastic ones. And so if you’re eating so little, the proportion of protein that you need really goes up in the diet, particularly with GLP-1s because we know that GLP-1s can cause muscle loss because there’s just so much weight loss going on.

So in those groups there are nutritionists saying we really need to pump some protein and make sure that people are keeping an eye on how much protein they’re getting. But on average, your average person, who is probably not meeting their daily gym requirements [Laughs] or whatever, is getting enough protein. They’re getting plenty. It’s fine. [Laughs.] Relax. We’re okay.

Feltman: [Laughs.] And are experts worried about any consequences that we might face writ large if people are focusing too much on getting as much protein as possible?

Brookshire: Yes. [Laughs.]

Feltman: [Laughs.]

Brookshire: And there’s several forms that concern takes. So in some populations—this is not every population; in fact this is kind of rare—but if you are someone who has kind of weak kidneys, getting really high levels of protein can be an issue because as I mentioned, when you have enough protein in your diet, you pee out the rest. Pee is processed through your kidneys, and if your kidneys are not up to snuff, the high-protein diet can become a problem. That’s pretty rare. Most people do not have that problem.

Another area that people are slightly concerned about is if you are, for example, “protein maxxing,” [Laughs] as the youths say, “protein maxxing”; you’re not “fiber maxxing” or ...

Feltman: Mm, and you gotta fiber max.

Brookshire: Or—yeah—or “fruit maxxing” or “vegetable maxxing” [Laughs] or any of the other things. The thing I talked to several nutritionists about that they’re kind of concerned about is that the modern approach to nutrition, in many ways, has come down to macros, right? Get in your protein, get in your carbs, get in your fat, get in the micronutrients that you need—you gotta get all your x’s and y’s and z’s in a row and make your spreadsheet. And food is so much more than that. [Laughs.] And a diet is so much more than that writ large. And so they’re concerned that people are kind of relying heavily on, like, supplementing specific ...

Feltman: Sure.

Brookshire: You know, nutrients, as opposed to eating just, like, some freaking food, man. Just, just eat food. [Laughs.] And so that’s another concern.

And the third concern that several nutritionists actually expressed to me: when people work on getting more protein, the vast majority of the time they get that protein from animal sources. Often, it’s whey protein, is, is often the protein that’s supplemented in ultra-processed foods. People will eat a lot of meat. And that’s, as we know, not great for the environment, right?

Feltman: Right.

Brookshire: Those proteins come from animals, which eat many foods and also burp many burps and fart many farts, and it’s not excellent for climate change. And so there are some people who are kind of concerned that as we work so hard to max our protein, that can be kind of a problem in terms of our impacts on the planet.

Feltman: So given that it’s not as simple as, “Oh, actually, everyone’s already eating too much protein,” or “Yeah, definitely, everyone needs to eat more protein,” what kind of research, what kind of data do we need to get to actually find the right nutritional solution for everybody?

Brookshire: So as I mentioned, you know, your estimated average requirement from studies in the ’80s is 0.8 grams per kilogram per day. I think it’d be kind of cool to actually, like, redo those studies and look at people at varying levels of activity, at varying ages, you know, things like that, and see what’s going on there—how much protein do we need?

And of course, there are many nutritionists who want to either raise the recommended daily allowance of protein to encourage people to get more protein, or in many cases they say we need it to be on kind of a spectrum; we need there to be some wiggle room. So most people who are relatively young, relatively healthy, like, 0.8 grams per kilogram to 1 gram per kilogram per day, that’s fine. That’ll do you. But as you get older, you may want to bump that up to 1.2 or even 1.5. If you’re someone who is spending a lot of time in the gym, really interested in building and maintaining muscle, you may actually want to increase those numbers.

So there’s kind of a move not necessarily toward increasing recommended daily allowances for everyone but acknowledging that we all have different nutritional needs and kind of thinking it—of it in terms of more what do you as a person with your lifestyle need, as opposed to what we all need to not die, which is what the recommended daily allowance is actually about: What do you need to not die? [Laughs.]

Feltman: [Laughs.]

Brookshire: And so there are nutritionists who say maybe we should increase it, and then there are others who are saying we probably don’t need to do that, so there’s debate within the community. I was very pleased to find out that it’s not, like, angry debate. [Laughs.]

Feltman: [Laughs.]

Brookshire: They were all very, very polite about it, which is quite nice. [Laughs.]

Feltman: The protein wars are actually very civil, so [Laughs], as it turns out.

Brookshire: They’re more, you know, comfortable protein discussions, probably over protein-boosted beer.

Feltman: [Laughs.] Wow.

Thank you so much for coming on to talk through this with us.

Brookshire: Thank you so much for having me.

Feltman: That’s all for today’s episode. Don’t forget to check out ScientificAmerican.com for more of Bethany’s reporting on protein and other topics. Tune in on Friday for a fascinating and important conversation about what our guest calls the Black womb crisis.

Science Quickly is produced by me, Rachel Feltman, along with Fonda Mwangi, Sushmita Pathak and Jeff DelViscio. This episode was edited by Alex Sugiura. Shayna Posses and Aaron Shattuck fact-check our show. Our theme music was composed by Dominic Smith. Subscribe to Scientific American for more up-to-date and in-depth science news.

For Scientific American, this is Rachel Feltman. See you next time!