惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

Y
Y Combinator Blog
腾讯CDC
Recent Announcements
Recent Announcements
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
Hugging Face - Blog
Hugging Face - Blog
H
Help Net Security
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
Last Week in AI
Last Week in AI
博客园_首页
D
DataBreaches.Net
P
Proofpoint News Feed
云风的 BLOG
云风的 BLOG
V
Visual Studio Blog
月光博客
月光博客
Jina AI
Jina AI
Stack Overflow Blog
Stack Overflow Blog
酷 壳 – CoolShell
酷 壳 – CoolShell
博客园 - 【当耐特】
Vercel News
Vercel News
WordPress大学
WordPress大学
J
Java Code Geeks
博客园 - 聂微东
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
U
Unit 42

The Register - Offbeat: Legal

Noyb cries foul on LinkedIn withholding profile visitor data China makes it illegal to fire humans if AI takes their jobs Databricks fails to shake authors' copyright claim Cloudera allegedly overlooked US job candidates: DoJ Australia threatens tech companies with 2.25 percent tax China blocks Meta's acquisition of AI outfit Manus Scotland Yard can keep using live facial recognition on Londoners, say judges UK tribunal sends £2B claim accusing Microsoft of overcharging for licensing to trial Yet another ex-ransomware negotiator admits turning rogue after payoff from crimelords Americans behind Nork IT fraud sentenced to 200 months Indian government investigating TCS after police sting French cops free mother and son after crypto kidnapping EFF: California 3D printer bill threatens digital freedoms IBM pays up under Trump administration's diversity blitz OpenAI CEO Sam Altman home attack suspect charged AI vs the cold hard reality of the legal profession Big Tech has not enforced Australia’s social media ban Big Tech has not enforced Australia’s social media ban China's not thrilled AI experts want to leave the country China's not thrilled AI experts want to leave the country JLR cyber bailout risks dangerous precedent, watchdog warns Patel dodges question about FBI buying location data Patel dodges question about FBI buying location data ChatGPT advised exec on firing Subnautica founders: court Japan to allow ‘proactive cyber-defense’ from October 1st FSF urges AI vendors to liberate LLMs Age verification isn't sage verification when it's inside operating systems India tests whether AI can stop trains hitting elephants Perplexity Comet hurtling toward Amazon ban Google embraces third party app stores and payments
Lenovo, Nintendo sue US government seeking tariff refunds
Simon Sharwood Simon Sharwood · 2026-03-09 · via The Register - Offbeat: Legal

Legal

Tech-adjacent Dyson, Epson, and Whoop also have a crack

WORLD WAR FEE Tech companies have started suing the US government to seek repayment of tariffs that the Supreme Court recently declared unconstitutional.

The Register on Monday noticed reports about Nintendo of America last week filing a complaint [PDF] that points out the February 20th Supreme Court opinion [PDF] in the case of Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump found that the administration was not able to use the the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to levy tariffs. That decision leaves open the possibility that the government may have to refund the importers who paid tariffs.

We’ve since searched for case filings in the United States Court of International Trade, the venue for tariff-related matters, and found several tech companies seeking refunds of tariffs the Supreme Court Found illegal.

Lenovo’s complaint [PDF] is dated February 20th – the day of the Supreme Court decision – but relies on rulings of lower courts.

The other filings we’ve found landed after the Supremes ruled out the administration’s use of IEEPA to impose tariffs, and come from designer vacuum cleaner biz Dyson, fitness wearable outfit Whoop, home security camera company Wyze, and printer-ink-slinger Epson Portland Inc.

They’re all similar in that they point out the plaintiff is an importer, note the outcome of the Learning Resources case and that the Supreme Court’s jurisdiction does not cover ordering refunds. Plaintiffs therefore ask the United States Court of International Trade to rule that they’re due a refund, plus interest. Plaintiffs also seek costs.

None of the filings we’ve seen mention what the plaintiffs intend to do with any refunds. That’s a contentious issue as several increased prices or changed pricing schemes after the introduction of tariffs, meaning consumers paid more. Law firm Arnold & Potter last week predicted a wave of consumer class actions – and noted a few are already in motion.

The firm describes the class actions as “untested and in their early stages” but also warns they have “sweeping implications on businesses across virtually every industry.”

“Any company that imposed tariff-related fees or increased prices in response to the now-invalidated IEEPA tariffs faces new, sprawling exposure that should be evaluated promptly.”

Grab some popcorn. Preferably domestically-produced popcorn, if you want to avoid legal complications.

The Trump administration has since re-introduced tariffs using other mechanisms, and vowed to continue doing so to prosecute its trade policy. ®