惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

G
Google Developers Blog
博客园 - 司徒正美
Last Week in AI
Last Week in AI
Recent Announcements
Recent Announcements
Y
Y Combinator Blog
博客园 - 聂微东
M
MIT News - Artificial intelligence
博客园_首页
Jina AI
Jina AI
博客园 - 叶小钗
酷 壳 – CoolShell
酷 壳 – CoolShell
H
Hackread – Cybersecurity News, Data Breaches, AI and More
J
Java Code Geeks
F
Fortinet All Blogs
aimingoo的专栏
aimingoo的专栏
小众软件
小众软件
Vercel News
Vercel News
The Cloudflare Blog
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
云风的 BLOG
云风的 BLOG
N
Netflix TechBlog - Medium
B
Blog
Google DeepMind News
Google DeepMind News
freeCodeCamp Programming Tutorials: Python, JavaScript, Git & More

The Register - Offbeat: Legal

Noyb cries foul on LinkedIn withholding profile visitor data China makes it illegal to fire humans if AI takes their jobs Databricks fails to shake authors' copyright claim Cloudera allegedly overlooked US job candidates: DoJ Australia threatens tech companies with 2.25 percent tax China blocks Meta's acquisition of AI outfit Manus Scotland Yard can keep using live facial recognition on Londoners, say judges UK tribunal sends £2B claim accusing Microsoft of overcharging for licensing to trial Yet another ex-ransomware negotiator admits turning rogue after payoff from crimelords Americans behind Nork IT fraud sentenced to 200 months Indian government investigating TCS after police sting French cops free mother and son after crypto kidnapping EFF: California 3D printer bill threatens digital freedoms IBM pays up under Trump administration's diversity blitz OpenAI CEO Sam Altman home attack suspect charged AI vs the cold hard reality of the legal profession Big Tech has not enforced Australia’s social media ban Big Tech has not enforced Australia’s social media ban China's not thrilled AI experts want to leave the country China's not thrilled AI experts want to leave the country JLR cyber bailout risks dangerous precedent, watchdog warns Patel dodges question about FBI buying location data Patel dodges question about FBI buying location data ChatGPT advised exec on firing Subnautica founders: court Japan to allow ‘proactive cyber-defense’ from October 1st FSF urges AI vendors to liberate LLMs Age verification isn't sage verification when it's inside operating systems India tests whether AI can stop trains hitting elephants Perplexity Comet hurtling toward Amazon ban Lenovo, Nintendo sue US government seeking tariff refunds
Qualcomm set to triumph in UK smartphone ‘patent tax’ case
2026-02-18 · via The Register - Offbeat: Legal

Personal Tech

Consumer group Which? brought the case and now plans to bail after court indicated it would lose

The UK’s Competition Appeal Tribunal has indicated that it will find Qualcomm did not abuse its market power, leading consumer advocacy group Which? to withdraw a case it hoped would see Brits compensated for increased smartphone prices.

Which? claimed that Qualcomm abused its market position as a dominant producer of processors and radio chips for smartphones, and that even Samsung and Apple felt they had no alternative but to pay inflated prices for some parts and then passed on the costs to buyers. UK consumers, the group argued, therefore paid more for certain smartphones between October 2015 and January 2024. Up to 29 million UK residents bought Qualcomm-equipped phones during that period, leading Which? to suggest they collectively overpaid by £480 million ($650 million), or £17 ($23) per device.

Senior Qualcomm execs and expert economists gave evidence on the matter during a five-week trial held in October and November 2025.

REG AD

Which?’s arguments flopped and the org concluded that the Tribunal will make three findings:

REG AD

  • Qualcomm did not coerce Apple, Apple’s Chipset Manufacturers (CMs), or Samsung to sign any patent licences or chipset agreements;
  • Qualcomm did not leverage its position as a chipset supplier to coerce Apple, Apple’s CMs, or Samsung to agree to any licensing terms; and
  • Qualcomm’s licensing and chipset practices did not infringe competition laws, did not result in inflated royalties, and did not lead to an increase in prices consumers paid for their mobile phones.

The consumer group and Qualcomm therefore agreed to wrap things up. Which? has filed documents to withdraw its case without Qualcomm paying a single penny and posted news of its decision.

Qualcomm’s UK lawyers clearly did a decent job preparing the case and stayed classy by not celebrating victory in their announcement of the planned agreement to write off the case.

It’s not clear why the Tribunal decided Which?’s case was bound to fail, but for what it’s worth in the last few months Apple and Samsung have both signaled they want to use less Qualcomm kit.

Cupertino has started using its own modems in the iPhone Air and some other low-end handsets, and Samsung revealed it wants to improve the performance of its Exynos SoCs so they can power its premium smartphones – a role Qualcomm currently fills with its Snapdragon silicon. ®