惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

罗磊的独立博客
L
LangChain Blog
aimingoo的专栏
aimingoo的专栏
IT之家
IT之家
B
Blog
博客园_首页
博客园 - 司徒正美
有赞技术团队
有赞技术团队
博客园 - 聂微东
I
InfoQ
美团技术团队
GbyAI
GbyAI
阮一峰的网络日志
阮一峰的网络日志
H
Help Net Security
大猫的无限游戏
大猫的无限游戏
MyScale Blog
MyScale Blog
WordPress大学
WordPress大学
The GitHub Blog
The GitHub Blog
A
About on SuperTechFans
人人都是产品经理
人人都是产品经理
Microsoft Azure Blog
Microsoft Azure Blog
Engineering at Meta
Engineering at Meta
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
The Cloudflare Blog

The Register - Offbeat: Legal

Noyb cries foul on LinkedIn withholding profile visitor data China makes it illegal to fire humans if AI takes their jobs Databricks fails to shake authors' copyright claim Cloudera allegedly overlooked US job candidates: DoJ Australia threatens tech companies with 2.25 percent tax China blocks Meta's acquisition of AI outfit Manus Scotland Yard can keep using live facial recognition on Londoners, say judges UK tribunal sends £2B claim accusing Microsoft of overcharging for licensing to trial Yet another ex-ransomware negotiator admits turning rogue after payoff from crimelords Americans behind Nork IT fraud sentenced to 200 months Indian government investigating TCS after police sting French cops free mother and son after crypto kidnapping EFF: California 3D printer bill threatens digital freedoms OpenAI CEO Sam Altman home attack suspect charged AI vs the cold hard reality of the legal profession Big Tech has not enforced Australia’s social media ban Big Tech has not enforced Australia’s social media ban China's not thrilled AI experts want to leave the country China's not thrilled AI experts want to leave the country JLR cyber bailout risks dangerous precedent, watchdog warns Patel dodges question about FBI buying location data Patel dodges question about FBI buying location data ChatGPT advised exec on firing Subnautica founders: court Japan to allow ‘proactive cyber-defense’ from October 1st FSF urges AI vendors to liberate LLMs Age verification isn't sage verification when it's inside operating systems India tests whether AI can stop trains hitting elephants Perplexity Comet hurtling toward Amazon ban Lenovo, Nintendo sue US government seeking tariff refunds Google embraces third party app stores and payments
IBM pays up under Trump administration's diversity blitz
Simon Sharwood Simon Sharwood · 2026-04-14 · via The Register - Offbeat: Legal

Legal

IBM becomes first company to pay up under Trump administration's diversity blitz

Didn't admit liability, will cough $17M, still fighting age discrimination cases

IBM has become the first company to settle with the US government under the Trump administration's Civil Rights Fraud Initiative, a program aimed at ensuring diversity programs don't cross a line and result in discrimination.

The administration defined its position on Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) in Executive Order 14173, issued in January 2025, which points out that US civil rights laws prevent discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. The order argues that organizations that run DEI programs may "actively use dangerous, demeaning, and immoral race and sex-based preferences" in violation of civil rights laws.

The order sought to stop federal contractors from operating DEI programs. In May 2025, the administration backed the order by creating the Civil Rights Fraud Initiative to investigate allegedly illegal DEI programs and handle whistleblower complaints. The instrument for those investigations is the False Claims Act (FCA), a law that imposes liability on organizations that provide false information to the federal government.

A March 2026 Executive Order added a requirement for federal government contractors to report on any DEI activity that contravenes the orders.

Last Friday, the Department of Justice announced the Initiative's first success: a settlement with IBM that will see the tech giant pay the US government $17,077,043 "to resolve allegations that it violated the False Claims Act by failing to comply with anti-discrimination requirements in its federal contracts."

The feds allege IBM pursued illegal DEI in three ways:

  • Constructed "diverse interview slates" when hiring staff
  • Developed "race and sex demographic goals for business units and took race and sex into account when making employment decisions" then measured progress against those goals
  • "Offered certain training, partnerships, mentoring, leadership development programs and educational opportunities only to certain employees, with eligibility, participation, access or admission limited on the basis of race or sex"

A settlement document [PDF] reveals IBM did not admit liability for the allegations, but assisted the feds with their inquiries.

Big Blue has also denied that it practices age discrimination on many occasions.

The feds did not concede that its claims were unfounded.

Deputy Assistant Attorney General Brenna E. Jenny welcomed the settlement, saying: "When a company accepts federal funding while engaging in practices that sort, prefer, or disadvantage employees on the basis of race or sex, the company is stepping outside the conditions under which the government agreed to contract with them, and we will hold them accountable."

Law firm Latham & Watkins LLP observed that the matter appears to relate to contracts IBM entered into before the 2025 executive order.

The firm also asserted that "IBM received settlement credit for cooperating with DOJ's investigation, including making early factual disclosures, assisting in the calculation of damages and penalties, and voluntarily terminating or modifying the programs and practices at issue."

"The scope of covered conduct and settlement methodology provide insight into the way DOJ is evaluating FCA liability based on alleged discrimination, and underscore DOJ's commitment to aggressively pursue FCA claims," Latham & Watkins advised.

Another firm, Epstein Becker Green, advised organizations for which "DEI remains a core mission or value" to "stay informed about changes in the law related to DEI and remain 'a step ahead' of any federal DEI investigation or enforcement action."

So perhaps it will be possible to run DEI programs without following IBM's lead. ®