惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

IT之家
IT之家
Last Week in AI
Last Week in AI
博客园_首页
酷 壳 – CoolShell
酷 壳 – CoolShell
博客园 - 叶小钗
大猫的无限游戏
大猫的无限游戏
人人都是产品经理
人人都是产品经理
V
Visual Studio Blog
宝玉的分享
宝玉的分享
博客园 - Franky
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
月光博客
月光博客
T
Tailwind CSS Blog
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
量子位
博客园 - 聂微东
S
SegmentFault 最新的问题
博客园 - 司徒正美
罗磊的独立博客
V
V2EX
freeCodeCamp Programming Tutorials: Python, JavaScript, Git & More
美团技术团队
小众软件
小众软件
Jina AI
Jina AI

Snorkel AI

Building AI-Native Systems for Federal Infrastructure: A Conversation with Rezaur Rahman Code World Models and AutoHarness for LLM Agents Benchtalks #1: Alex Shaw (Terminal-Bench, Harbor) – Building the Benchmark Factory Building FinQA: An Open RL Environment for Financial Reasoning Agents Coding agents don’t need to be perfect, they need to recover Closing the Evaluation Gap in Agentic AI SlopCodeBench: Measuring Code Erosion as Agents Iterate Introducing the Snorkel Agentic Coding Benchmark 2026: The year of environments Part V: Future Direction and Emerging Trends in Rubric-Based AI Evaluation The self-critique paradox: Why AI verification fails where it’s needed most Chat With the Terminal-Bench Team | Snorkel AI Intelligence per watt: A new metric for AI’s future Terminal-Bench 2.0: Raising the bar for AI agent evaluation Snorkeling in RL environments Introducing SnorkelSpatial: A Benchmark for LLM Spatial Reasoning Scaling Trust: Rubrics in Snorkel's Quality Process Evaluating Multi-Agent Systems in Enterprise Tool Use Evaluating Coding Agents with Terminal-Bench 2.0 Parsing isn’t neutral: why evaluation choices matter The science of rubric design The right tool for the job: An A-Z of rubrics Data quality and rubrics: how to build trust in your models Building the benchmark: inside our agentic insurance underwriting dataset Evaluating AI agents for insurance underwriting LLM observability: key practices, tools, and challenges Anthropic Claude + AWS: revolutionizing pharma data analytics with Snorkel AI Data-centric development of an enterprise AI agent with Snorkel Building the data development platform for specialized AI LLM-as-a-judge for enterprises: evaluate model alignment at scale
How Tool Discipline Let a 4B Model Outsmart a 235B Giant ...
Alexis Sobel · 2026-02-19 · via Snorkel AI

The Snorkel research team collaborated with the rLLM team at UC Berkeley on the Agentica project, using their open-source rLLM framework to fine-tune Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507, delivering a model that beats Qwen3-235B-A22B on Snorkel AI’s expert-curated financial benchmarks – at 1/60th the size. A full breakdown of the results are published in the rLLM blog here.

The key insight? Just focus on tool use.

Large generalist models have excellent reasoning but poor tool discipline. They hallucinate column names, ignore constraints, and generate SQL that returns nonsensical results. The problem isn’t intelligence—it’s reliability.

Rather than training on expensive multi-table examples, the team focused on teaching reliable tool use with simple, single-table queries – and those skills generalized. In internal ablations, single-table-only training achieved the best results (66.3% internal Pass@1), outperforming both single + multi-table (61.6%) and a single→multi curriculum (64.8%).

The fundamentals generalize: explore tables before querying, validate data before proceeding, retry on failure rather than giving up.

Trained on simple tasks, verified in complex environments

The Snorkel team’s contributions were (1) the agentic environment for eval and RL, and (2) our Snorkel Finance benchmark and Finance Reasoning benchmark, containing expert-curated financial analysis tasks for evaluating the agent’s performance, so we could be confident that the lift we saw was relevant to realistic, complex tasks. The rLLM team developed single-table queries that focused on using the relevant tools correctly, then completed the RL fine-tuning of the model under test in the environment.

Enterprise implications

The economics shift substantially. For a firm processing 50,000 analyst queries monthly, this approach could reduce costs by 90% while improving accuracy and keeping data on-premises. A 4B model runs on a single GPU; its 235B counterpart requires a multi-node cluster.

The methodology isn’t finance-specific either. Healthcare, legal, insurance – anywhere structured data and tool use intersect – the same pipeline applies: convert documents into queryable structures, teach tool-calling fundamentals on simple queries, verify aggressively, and fine-tune.

Build your own domain specialists

Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 was fine-tuned using the rLLM framework on a cluster of 8x H100 GPUs. By using small, specialized judges (GPT-5-nano) for simpler verifications and reserving larger models only for complex multi-table queries, the team kept the total training cost under $500 per run.

This fundamentally changes the accessibility of domain adaptation. You do not need a massive pre-training cluster to build a state-of-the-art specialist; instead, you need the right domain expertise, a well-engineered RL environment, and a smart verification pipeline.

The team is open-sourcing everything. Check out the rLLM blog here for links to their repository and the full details.


Snorkel is thrilled to have collaborated with Berkeley’s Sky Computing Lab and the rLLM team on this research project. For more details, check out their homepage here. For more information on how Snorkel can help you with RL environments and expert-curated datasets, come talk to us!