惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

爱范儿
爱范儿
E
Exploit-DB.com RSS Feed
Google DeepMind News
Google DeepMind News
F
Full Disclosure
D
Darknet – Hacking Tools, Hacker News & Cyber Security
T
ThreatConnect
Stack Overflow Blog
Stack Overflow Blog
Last Week in AI
Last Week in AI
Martin Fowler
Martin Fowler
G
GRAHAM CLULEY
C
Check Point Blog
T
Threatpost
I
Intezer
Spread Privacy
Spread Privacy
The Register - Security
The Register - Security
Project Zero
Project Zero
月光博客
月光博客
人人都是产品经理
人人都是产品经理
阮一峰的网络日志
阮一峰的网络日志
D
DataBreaches.Net
IT之家
IT之家
Malwarebytes
Malwarebytes
T
The Blog of Author Tim Ferriss
P
Privacy International News Feed
P
Palo Alto Networks Blog
T
The Exploit Database - CXSecurity.com
量子位
李成银的技术随笔
Threat Intelligence Blog | Flashpoint
Threat Intelligence Blog | Flashpoint
Cisco Talos Blog
Cisco Talos Blog
Know Your Adversary
Know Your Adversary
美团技术团队
The GitHub Blog
The GitHub Blog
T
Tor Project blog
M
MIT News - Artificial intelligence
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
Google Online Security Blog
Google Online Security Blog
P
Proofpoint News Feed
有赞技术团队
有赞技术团队
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
博客园 - 司徒正美
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
C
Comments on: Blog
T
Threat Research - Cisco Blogs
aimingoo的专栏
aimingoo的专栏
Security Latest
Security Latest
NISL@THU
NISL@THU
The Cloudflare Blog
H
Help Net Security
Recent Commits to openclaw:main
Recent Commits to openclaw:main

The Cloudflare Blog

The day my ping took countermeasures Announcing Claude Compliance API support with Cloudflare CASB Announcing Claude Managed Agents on Cloudflare Project Glasswing: what Mythos showed us Our billing pipeline was suddenly slow. The culprit was a hidden bottleneck in ClickHouse Browser Run: now running on Cloudflare Containers, it’s faster and more scalable When "idle" isn't idle: how a Linux kernel optimization became a QUIC bug Building For The Future How Cloudflare responded to the “Copy Fail” Linux vulnerability When DNSSEC goes wrong: how we responded to the .de TLD outage Code Orange: Fail Small is complete. The result is a stronger Cloudflare network Introducing Dynamic Workflows: durable execution that follows the tenant Post-quantum encryption for Cloudflare IPsec is generally available Agents can now create Cloudflare accounts, buy domains, and deploy Shutdowns, power outages, and conflict: a review of Q1 2026 Internet disruptions Making Rust Workers reliable: panic and abort recovery in wasm‑bindgen Moving past bots vs. humans Building the agentic cloud: everything we launched during Agents Week 2026 The AI engineering stack we built internally — on the platform we ship Orchestrating AI Code Review at scale Introducing the Agent Readiness score. Check to see if your site is agent-ready Shared Dictionaries: compression that keeps up with the agentic web Redirects for AI Training enforces canonical content Unweight: how we compressed an LLM 22% without sacrificing quality Agents that remember: introducing Agent Memory Agents Week: network performance update Introducing Flagship: feature flags built for the age of AI Cloudflare’s AI Platform: an inference layer designed for agents Building the foundation for running extra-large language models AI Search: the search primitive for your agents Deploy Postgres and MySQL databases with PlanetScale + Workers Artifacts: versioned storage that speaks Git Email for agents - Cloudflare Email Service now in public beta Project Think: building the next generation of AI agents on Cloudflare Introducing Agent Lee - a new interface to the Cloudflare stack Register domains wherever you build: Cloudflare Registrar API now in beta Browser Run: give your agents a browser Rearchitecting the Workflows control plane for the agentic era Add voice to your agent Managed OAuth for Access: make internal apps agent-ready in one click Securing non-human identities: automated revocation, OAuth, and scoped permissions Scaling MCP adoption: Our reference architecture for simpler, safer and cheaper enterprise deployments of MCP Secure private networking for everyone: users, nodes, agents, Workers — introducing Cloudflare Mesh Building a CLI for all of Cloudflare Durable Objects in Dynamic Workers: Give each AI-generated app its own database Agents have their own computers with Sandboxes GA Dynamic, identity-aware, and secure Sandbox auth Welcome to Agents Week 500 Tbps of capacity: 16 years of scaling our global network From bytecode to bytes- automated magic packet generation Cloudflare targets 2029 for full post-quantum security How we built Organizations to help enterprises manage Cloudflare at scale Why we're rethinking cache for the AI era Our ongoing commitment to privacy for the 1.1.1.1 public DNS resolver Introducing EmDash — the spiritual successor to WordPress that solves plugin security Introducing Programmable Flow Protection: custom DDoS mitigation logic for Magic Transit customers Cloudflare Client-Side Security: smarter detection, now open to everyone How we use Abstract Syntax Trees (ASTs) to turn Workflows code into visual diagrams A one-line Kubernetes fix that saved 600 hours a year Sandboxing AI agents, 100x faster Inside Gen 13- how we built our most powerful server yet Launching Cloudflare’s Gen 13 servers- trading cache for cores for 2x edge compute performance Powering the agents: Workers AI now runs large models, starting with Kimi K2.5 Introducing Custom Regions for precision data control Standing up for the open Internet- why we appealed Italy’s Piracy Shield fine From legacy architecture to Cloudflare One Announcing Cloudflare Account Abuse Protection: prevent fraudulent attacks from bots and humans Slashing agent token costs by 98% with RFC 9457-compliant error responses AI Security for Apps is now generally available Building a security overview dashboard for actionable insights Investigating multi-vector attacks in Log Explorer Translating risk insights into actionable protection: leveling up security posture with Cloudflare and Mastercard Fixing request smuggling vulnerabilities in Pingora OSS deployments Active defense: introducing a stateful vulnerability scanner for APIs Complexity is a choice. SASE migrations shouldn’t take years. From the endpoint to the prompt: a unified data security vision in Cloudflare One Ending the "silent drop": how Dynamic Path MTU Discovery makes the Cloudflare One Client more resilient A QUICker SASE client: re-building Proxy Mode How Automatic Return Routing solves IP overlap Always-on detections: eliminating the WAF “log versus block” trade-off Mind the gap: new tools for continuous enforcement from boot to login Stop reacting to breaches and start preventing them with User Risk Scoring Defeating the deepfake: stopping laptop farms and insider threats Moving from license plates to badges: the Gateway Authorization Proxy Evolving Cloudflare’s Threat Intelligence Platform: actionable, scalable, and ETL-less Introducing the 2026 Cloudflare Threat Report See risk, fix risk: introducing Remediation in Cloudflare CASB How Cloudy translates complex security into human action From reactive to proactive: closing the phishing gap with LLMs Modernizing with agile SASE: a Cloudflare One blog takeover Beyond the blank slate: how Cloudflare accelerates your Zero Trust journey The truly programmable SASE platform Toxic combinations: when small signals add up to a security incident We deserve a better streams API for JavaScript The most-seen UI on the Internet? Redesigning Turnstile and Challenge Pages ASPA: making Internet routing more secure Bringing more transparency to post-quantum usage, encrypted messaging, and routing security How we rebuilt Next.js with AI in one week Cloudflare One is the first SASE offering modern post-quantum encryption across the full platform Cloudflare outage on February 20, 2026
New! Rate Limiting analytics and throttling
Cloudflare Team · 2023-09-19 · via The Cloudflare Blog

2023-09-19

6 min read

Rate Limiting rules are essential in the toolbox of security professionals as they are very effective in managing targeted volumetric attacks, takeover attempts, scraping bots, or API abuse. Over the years we have received a lot of feature requests from users, but two stand out: suggesting rate limiting thresholds and implementing a throttle behavior. Today we released both to Enterprise customers!

When creating a rate limit rule, one of the common questions is “what rate should I put in to block malicious traffic without affecting legitimate users?”. If your traffic is authenticated, API Gateway will suggest thresholds based on auth IDs (such a session-id, cookie, or API key). However, when you don’t have authentication headers, you will need to create IP-based rules (like for a ‘/login’ endpoint) and you are left guessing the threshold. From today, we provide analytics tools to determine what rate of requests can be used for your rule.

So far, a rate limit rule could be created with log, challenge, or block action. When ‘block’ is selected, all requests from the same source (for example, IP) were blocked for the timeout period. Sometimes this is not ideal, as you would rather selectively block/allow requests to enforce a maximum rate of requests without an outright temporary ban. When using throttle, a rule lets through enough requests to keep the request rate from individual clients below a customer-defined threshold.

Continue reading to learn more about each feature.

Introducing Rate Limit Analysis in Security Analytics

The Security Analytics view was designed with the intention of offering complete visibility on HTTP traffic while adding an extra layer of security on top. It's proven a great value when it comes to crafting custom rules. Nevertheless, when it comes to creating rate limiting rules, relying solely on Security Analytics can be somewhat challenging.

To create a rate limiting rule you can leverage Security Analytics to determine the filter — what requests are evaluated by the rule (for example, by filtering on mitigated traffic, or selecting other security signals like Bot scores). However, you’ll also need to determine what’s the maximum rate you want to enforce and that depends on the specific application, traffic pattern, time of day, endpoint, etc. What’s the typical rate of legitimate users trying to access the login page at peak time? What’s the rate of requests generated by a botnet with the same JA3 fingerprint scraping prices from an ecommerce site? Until today, you couldn’t answer these questions from the analytics view.

That’s why we made the decision to integrate a rate limit helper into Security Analytics as a new tab called "Rate Limit Analysis," which concentrates on providing a tool to answer rate-related questions.

High level top statistics vs. granular Rate Limit Analysis

In Security Analytics, users can analyze traffic data by creating filters combining what we call top statistics. These statistics reveal the total volume of requests associated with a specific attribute of the HTTP requests. For example, you can filter the traffic from the ASNs that generated more requests in the last 24 hours, or you slice the data to look only at traffic reaching the most popular paths of your application. This tool is handy when creating rules based on traffic analysis.

Screenshot of expandable top N statistics

However, for rate limits, a more detailed approach is required.

The new Rate limit analysis tab now displays data on request rate for traffic matching the selected filter and time period. You can select a rate defined on different time intervals, like one or five minutes, and the attribute of the request used to identify the rate, such as IP address, JA3 fingerprint, or a combination of both as this often improves accuracy. Once the attributes are selected, the chart displays the distribution of request rates for the top 50 unique clients (identified as unique IPs or JA3s) observed during the chosen time interval in descending order.

Screenshot of the dashboard highlighting Rate limit analysis tab within Security Analytics view

You can use the slider to determine the impact of a rule with different thresholds. How many clients would have been caught by the rule and rate limited? Can I visually identify abusers with above-average rate vs. the long tail of average users? This information will guide you in assessing what’s the most appropriate rate for the selected filter.

Using Rate Limit Analysis to define rate thresholds

It takes a few minutes to build your rate limit rule now. Let’s apply this to one of the common use cases where we identify /login endpoint and create a rate limit rule based on the IP with a logging action.

Define a scope and rate.

  • In the HTTP requests tab (the default view), start by selecting a specific time period. If you’re looking for the normal rate distribution you can specify a period with non-peak traffic. Alternatively, you can analyze the rate of offending users by selecting a period when an attack was carried out.

  • Using the filters in the top statistics, select a specific endpoint (e.g., /login). We can also focus on non-automated/human traffic using the bot score quick filter on the right sidebar or the filter button on top of the chart. In the Rate limiting Analysis tab, you can choose the characteristic (JA3, IP, or both) and duration (1 min, 5 mins, or 1 hour) for your rate limit rule. At this point, moving the dotted line up and down can help you choose an appropriate rate for the rule. JA3 is only available to customers using Bot Management.

Top IP addresses distribution from the new rate limit analysis tab for previous 12 hours, grouping by top IP Address over a 1 min interval, using Bot score greater than 40 and /login API endpoint as filters
  • Looking at the distribution, we can exclude any IPs or ASNs that might be known to us, to have a better visual on end user traffic. One way to do this is to filter out the outliers right before the long tail begins. A rule with this setting will block the IPs/JA3 with a higher rate of requests.

Validate your rate. You can validate the rate by repeating this process but selecting a portion of traffic where you know there was an attack or traffic peak. The rate you've chosen should block the outliers during the attack and allow traffic during normal times. In addition to that, looking at the sampled logs can be helpful in verifying the fingerprints and filters chosen.

Create a rule. Selecting “Create rate limit rule” will take you to the rate limiting tab in the WAF with your filters pre-populated.

screenshot from Rate Limiting WAF rule with values distributed from the chosen filters

Choose your action and behavior in the rule. Depending on your needs you can choose to log, challenge, or block requests exceeding the selected threshold. It’s often a good idea to first deploy the rule with a log action to validate the threshold and then change the action to block or challenge when you are confident with the result. With every action, you can also choose between two behaviors: fixed action or throttle. Learn more about the difference in the next section.

Introducing the new throttle behavior

Until today, the only available behavior for Rate Limiting has been fixed action, where an action is triggered for a selected time period (also known as timeout). For example, did the IP 192.0.2.23 exceed the rate of 20 requests per minute? Then block (or log) all requests from this IP for, let’s say, 10 minutes.

Fixed action: once a threshold is reached, the action is performed for a customer-defined time duration.

In some situations, this type of penalty is too severe and risks affecting legitimate traffic. For example, if a device in a corporate network (think about NAT) exceeds the threshold, all devices sharing the same IP will be blocked outright.

With throttling, rate limiting selectively drops requests to maintain the rate within the specified threshold. It’s like a leaky bucket behavior (with the only difference that we do not implement a queuing system). For example, throttling a client to 20 requests per minute means that when a request comes from this client, we look at the last 60 seconds and see if (on average) we have received less than 20 requests. If this is true, the rule won’t perform any action. If the average is already at 20 requests then we will take action on that request. When another request comes in, we will check again. Since some time has passed the average rate might have dropped, making room for more requests.

Throttle behavior: for every request we assess whether the average rate is within the defined limit; if it is then we allow the request.

Throttling can be used with all actions: block, log, or challenge. When creating a rule, you can select the behavior after choosing the action.

The Rate Limit rule user interface allows users to select what behavior should be used.

When using any challenge action, we recommend using the fixed action behavior. As a result, when a client exceeds the threshold we will challenge all requests until a challenge is passed. The client will then be able to reach the origin again until the threshold is breached again.

Throttle behavior is available to Enterprise rate limiting plans.

Try it out!

Today we are introducing a new Rate Limiting analytics experience along with the throttle behavior for all Rate Limiting users on Enterprise plans. We will continue to work actively on providing a better experience to save our customers' time. Log in to the dashboard, try out the new experience, and let us know your feedback using the feedback button located on the top right side of the Analytics page or by reaching out to your account team directly.

WAFRate LimitingAnalytics