惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

PCI Perspectives
PCI Perspectives
AI
AI
L
LINUX DO - 最新话题
Exploit-DB.com RSS Feed
Exploit-DB.com RSS Feed
W
WeLiveSecurity
T
Troy Hunt's Blog
K
KPMG report finds enterprise disconnect between AI and its ROI | CIO
Forbes - Security
Forbes - Security
Google DeepMind News
Google DeepMind News
Hacker News - Newest:
Hacker News - Newest: "LLM"
O
OpenAI News
D
DataBreaches.Net
S
Secure Thoughts
SecWiki News
SecWiki News
L
LangChain Blog
Google DeepMind News
Google DeepMind News
博客园 - 【当耐特】
Recent Announcements
Recent Announcements
Martin Fowler
Martin Fowler
cs.AI updates on arXiv.org
cs.AI updates on arXiv.org
Application and Cybersecurity Blog
Application and Cybersecurity Blog
Engineering at Meta
Engineering at Meta
H
Heimdal Security Blog
有赞技术团队
有赞技术团队
The Last Watchdog
The Last Watchdog
Recent Commits to openclaw:main
Recent Commits to openclaw:main
宝玉的分享
宝玉的分享
N
News | PayPal Newsroom
博客园 - 聂微东
TaoSecurity Blog
TaoSecurity Blog
Cloudbric
Cloudbric
Blog — PlanetScale
Blog — PlanetScale
cs.CV updates on arXiv.org
cs.CV updates on arXiv.org
量子位
T
Threatpost
Security Latest
Security Latest
P
Privacy & Cybersecurity Law Blog
GbyAI
GbyAI
博客园 - 叶小钗
L
Lohrmann on Cybersecurity
S
Security @ Cisco Blogs
Y
Y Combinator Blog
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
T
Tailwind CSS Blog
C
Cyber Attacks, Cyber Crime and Cyber Security
酷 壳 – CoolShell
酷 壳 – CoolShell
H
Hackread – Cybersecurity News, Data Breaches, AI and More
Apple Machine Learning Research
Apple Machine Learning Research
N
Netflix TechBlog - Medium
L
LINUX DO - 热门话题

UX Collective - Medium

Designing the Human+AI system AI UX debt: A new bottleneck The case for catholic philosophy in ethical interface design What critical thinking means for senior designers (and how to apply it) Most AI tools make users faster. The best AI tools make users better. From faster pencil to AI Experience Architect: a designer’s path The waiting problem in AI products Be like water, The death of the empty state, AI for UX The big M&M’s color investigation you could’ve totally lived without How mobile apps are reshaping screening for cognitive decline Two gears, one compass: designing at velocity while sustaining quality Should we be kind to machines (for our own sake, really)? How to write a DESIGN.md file Claude can actually use Opening your place to the street The undo problem in AI products The one-dimensional pipe between two high-dimensional minds AI made everyone a creator, not a designer Can a typeface be safe? What do you do if your best design work is a small project? Low cortisol solution to big problems The death of the empty state in AI products Be like water: Rethinking the design process with AI How I use AI to partner on design problems Rethinking design with your hands in the AI world The thinking was never just mine Prompt is not interface, UI patterns that won’t survive, how to make Claude follow your design… Discovery is the work AI gives back The left-handed rope Everything I know about AI, I learned from a genie How to make Claude Code follow your design system in Figma The prompt is not an interface Designing data-intensive applications — advice for interaction designers Users own the present. You own the future. The first taste of Joy We built this. Now we own it. Why you need to protect your work more than ever The psychological fine print of AI The trick to designing agentic AI is learning how to think like a manager St. Augustine and AI’s false promise Pinning is not saving. Saving is not favoriting. Favoriting is not flagging. You skipped the first question. Now you’re adding AI. When AI decides and human signs off Collected consciousness, exhausting moment, UX Research with AI Don’t simply bolt on AI. Rethink from the ground up. The basketball playbook for AI builder teams Can AI make your dating life better? Usability, accessibility, and the human-AI paradigm Thoughtful AI Implementation for UXR Leaders A GenAI perplexed by color theory 10 UI patterns that won’t survive the AI shift What is AI really costing the planet? The most dangerous pronoun in design Staff designers aren’t about shipping the best work. That’s the point. The forgotten conversation problem in AI chat A fantastic voyage, the illusion of good taste, the art of subtraction The right touch: mapping AI presence to user intent The rulebook for designing AI experiences Designing with AI without losing your mind What improv taught me about why innovation falls out of sync Working in the open How design leaders influence decisions without being in the room How to mitigate the risk of AI implementation in enterprise environments CSS you didn’t know you could style Product design in 2026: the beginning of a fantastic voyage? The chat box isn’t a UI paradigm. It’s what shipped. The web trained AI to deceive. Now designers have to untrain it. The art of subtraction in a world of infinite features What we behold, the trust-latency gap, designing haptics AI is ruining the way you talk about your work The deceptive nature of today’s AI conversation design and how to fix it Rethinking the shape of design teams in an AI world Becoming an AI-native designer The misrepresentation of “good taste” as a core design skill Test smart: how to approach AI and stay sane? Are we makers by nature — or consumers by design? Your AI agent can read your codebase. It doesn’t know your product. Folder instructions — Instructions for system-level AI Haptics: how to build a consistent cross-platform solution and align code with Figma I watched the manosphere documentary; here is how design is making things worse. Autopilot, agentic AI, and the dangers of imperfect metaphors Oh, but there’s one more thing We become what we behold AI, UX, and the factory model The trust gap in healthcare AI isn’t about the AI How to turn your competitor’s worst reviews into your strongest design argument The erosion of design authority, burnout problems, invisible customers Most products don’t need tone of voice — they need a point Designing adaptive teams The trust-latency gap: why the future of UX is intentionally slower Rethinking design critique Notes from the people building your future taste.md Social media on trial The old design workshop is dead. Long live design workshops. Careful, liable UX is a thing now Beyond the user: why design needs to widen its circle Designing for the invisible customer The UX ground is shaking, synthetic users, building perspective Data models: the shared language your AI and team are both missing We didn’t mean to build this- engagement at any cost
How AI may reshape elderly care
Catherine Ch · 2026-04-23 · via UX Collective - Medium
A unique design challenge Photo by Georg Arthur Pflueger on Unsplash AI has changed so many parts of our lives, for better and for worse. Beyond the uses we see every day, it’s also quietly serving groups that don’t always get much attention. There are over 1 billion people aged 60 and older, and over 55 million people living with dementia worldwide. My own family and many people around me have had to take care of an elderly loved one. It’s never easy. It takes constant attention, patience, time, and energy. With all the advances in technology, could AI actually take some weight off a caregiver’s shoulders, and do it ethically? What makes this user group different Older adults aren’t just “users with accessibility needs.” They represent a fundamentally different design paradigm, and that means a lot of the frameworks designers use by default don’t quite fit. They are afraid of making mistakes A 2025 systematic review of 132 studies on age-friendly mobile app design highlights several barriers: cognitive overload from complex interfaces, fine motor difficulties that make small touchscreens unusable, and, most importantly, a fear of making errors. Unlike younger people who grew up with technology, older users are more cautious and genuinely afraid they’ll break something. The fear turns into serious anxiety and resistance. They might not be the ones using it A lot of the time, the resident is the one being assessed, but the caregiver is the one holding the device and reading the screen. That means you’re designing two different experiences at once: one for clinical accuracy and speed, one for comfort and dignity. HCI researchers have recently started pushing for technologies where the person with dementia is “an active rather than a passive user of technology in the management” of their own care, but there isn’t a clear picture about what it will look like yet. This also creates a consent problem. Someone with moderate-to-severe cognitive impairment can’t really read a privacy policy, can’t fully understand what an audio or visual monitor is doing, can’t meaningfully consent to having their face scanned. So how do you design ethically for someone who can’t choose whether to be designed for? They might actively resist the product Compared to other age groups, older adults tend to show the lowest levels of trust in technology. From watching my own family, I also see that when someone is dealing with chronic illness like dementia, anything unfamiliar can spike anxiety or even anger. Wearable fall detectors get taken off or switched off all the time. Anything that looks or feels like surveillance can make them feel extremely uncomfortable and vulnerable. With most products, the design challenge is to get people to engage. However, with this group, the challenge is more like getting them to tolerate the thing existing in their space. Nielsen Norman Group has noticed something similar: even tech-savvy seniors are quick to uninstall apps they find annoying and delete accounts that feel intrusive. In a care setting, where the product usually isn’t their choice, the pushback can be even stronger. They’re hard to co-design with “Involve your users in the design process” is the principle many designers follow. But researchers at JMIR found that co-design sessions with cognitively impaired older adults are extremely challenging. Participants get tired quickly, lose interest, struggle with hardware, and sometimes can’t hear the voices clearly. Stuff you’d never think about (e.g., glare on a screen, a chair without armrests, ambient noise in the room) can completely derail a session. Problems and current AI solutions These constraints push design teams to get more creative. There are already several AI products tackling the biggest issues: undetected pain, falls, loneliness. Undetected pain Studies show that pain is drastically underdiagnosed in people with cognitive impairment. Traditional pain assessments rely on a caregiver watching the patient’s face and body language, which is not only subjective and inconsistent, but also vulnerable to racial and gender bias in how expressions get read. Caregivers also can’t monitor every moment, which means pain can go unnoticed for hours. The product PainChek , developed in Australia, is an app built for detecting pain. A caregiver records a short video of the resident’s face. AI will then analyze the tiny muscle movements tied to pain expressions. Then the caregiver works through guided checklists across five other areas (voice, movement, behavior, activity, body). The app combines AI and human judgment to generate an overall pain score. PainChek scanning patient’s face ( image source ) According to MIT Technology Review , a dementia care chain in England that adopted PainChek saw psychotropic prescriptions drop and residents calm down. Turns out a lot of what was being treated as “behavioral issues” was actually unaddressed pain. Design/technical challenge The hybrid system is designed to improve speed and accuracy by combining machine objectivity and human clinical judgment. However, both human and machine can introduce bias. For the human part, one Australian study found Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander residents were getting lower total pain scores than non-Indigenous residents. For the machine part, facial recognition trained on narrow datasets can misread people from minority groups. How to balance AI and human roles for more accurate results remains an open question. Worth thinking about This is a case where the user isn’t the direct operator, but their well-being relies heavily on how accurately someone else uses the tool. Every design choice (binary vs. scale, automated vs. manual) becomes an ethical choice. There is also a risk that clinicians start relying on the score too heavily, instead of trusting their own experience. A caregiver who knows the patient’s history can bring insights an algorithm can’t. Falls Falls are one of the leading causes of unplanned hospital admissions among older adults. The old fall-detection tools (e.g., pendant alarms, wristbands) usually need the person to hit a button after they’ve fallen, which many people can’t do after a fall. And many residents refuse to wear them at all because they make them feel like they’re being watched. Also, many older people just aren’t used to wearing something on their body all day. Design challenge The easy solution to this problem is “just use cameras.” But for some older adults, especially those who don’t trust technology, cameras make them feel watched and powerless. So the challenge is designing something seniors actually feel comfortable having around. The products Nobi , a Belgian company, makes AI-powered ceiling lamps that detect falls and keep an eye on sleep and behavior. The U.S. head of the company said their goal is making something “a resident would want in their apartment.” It’s designed to look attractive and blend into the environment. This AI lamp is trained on over 250,000 real-life scenarios. It uses optical sensors to detect falls. Once a fall is detected, it verbally asks if the resident is okay, then notifies staff. It can also shift its lighting to match circadian rhythms, such as dimming at night and getting brighter in the morning. The goal is to help with disorientation and reduce the risk of falls. Nobi lamp ( image source ) Then there is Sensi.AI , which uses a different approach. It’s an always-on audio device — no cameras, no wearables, no screen or interface for the senior to interact with. It just sits in the background and listens for patterns: coughing, tone of voice, movement sounds, changes in eating or sleep. The AI interprets what it hears and sends insights to caregivers. Worth thinking about Invisible, background products might be more acceptable for people who don’t want to feel monitored, or who don’t have the tech literacy to use an interface. However, it can get so invisible that users forget they exist, which makes privacy, data collection, and data handling extremely important. Nobi, the AI lamp, tried to address this problem . All image processing happens locally in the lamp. Nothing goes to the cloud. The system only sends events, not raw footage. When imagery does get captured, residents show up as anonymous stick figures. Footage gets deleted automatically unless a fall is detected, and even then it’s kept for a maximum of 14 days. Loneliness Many nursing home residents go days without a meaningful conversation. Some can’t physically or mentally get out of their bed to meet people. Social isolation is seriously dangerous for older adults. Research links it to higher rates of dementia, depression, heart disease, and early death. In the U.S., nearly 30% of seniors live alone. A 2024 scoping review of human-centered design for loneliness tech makes an important point: loneliness in later life has its own causes, such as losing a spouse, moving into a care facility, losing mobility. We can’t design through the lens of the loneliness younger people feel. Design challenge For mainstream users, companion products tend to look like cute pets or things you’re meant to bond with. But when researchers asked older adults what they wanted, they said they didn’t want a toy or a pet. They wanted a stationary object that noticed they were there, started conversations, and offered support. They don’t want to feel like they’re emotionally dependent on it or like it’s trying to replace a human relationship. There is also an engagement problem. Voice assistants like Alexa, Siri, and Google Home wait for a wake word. However, this doesn’t work well for isolated older people, because they’re unlikely to initiate interaction themselves. So the designer has to figure out a way for the product to start the conversation itself. The product ElliQ tracks behavior patterns, sentiment, time of day, and conversation history. With all that data, it decides when to check in, suggest an activity, offer some trivia, or just say good morning. The product is designed to look like a friendly object rather than a humanoid robot or cute pet. According to the design team, the hardest part was dialing in the right amount of proactivity. In early beta testing, some users got startled by how often it jumped in. The team spent years tuning how often it initiates, what it suggests, and when to just back off. In a New York State pilot with over 800 older adults, 95% reported feeling less lonely, and users were interacting with it more than 30 times a day. ElliQ ( image source ) The AI-in-elder-care market was worth $56.78 billion in 2025, and it’s growing more than 21% a year. That number is only going up as the world is aging and staffing shortages aren’t going anywhere. At this point, using technology as part of the solution is inevitable. But it’s important to remember these aren’t just numbers. The elderly are a vulnerable group, and sometimes they can’t speak up for themselves. That’s why we need to keep asking the harder questions: Is this ethical? Is it replacing something that actually matters in a human life? Take ElliQ’s 95% loneliness-reduction stat. The number is impressive, but even so, the technology should be a supplement, not a replacement. As one AI industry report put it: “AI cannot replace human interaction, which is of the utmost importance to the elderly as loneliness is a negative influence on cognitive decline.” Pain detection is similar. AI can flag it, but a clinician’s experience and judgment are often what’s needed to actually make the right call. It’s also worth asking whether technology might amplify the very problem it’s trying to solve. Will institutions use these tools as a reason to hire fewer staff and cut costs, making short-staffing even worse? And most of these products are still in early stages. PainChek has a relatively solid evidence base, but the studies still rely on limited sample sizes and specific populations. At the end of the day, we’re designing for people in one of the most fragile chapters of their lives. That deserves care, gentleness, and rigorous study, maybe more than ever. Reference: Alzheimer’s Disease International. (n.d.). Dementia statistics . https://www.alzint.org/about/dementia-facts-figures/dementia-statistics/ Amouzadeh, E., Dianat, I., Faradmal, J., & Babamiri, M. (2025). Optimizing mobile app design for older adults: Systematic review of age-friendly design. Aging Clinical and Experimental Research , 37 , 248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-025-03157-7 Brett, K., & Severn, M. (2023). Facial analysis technology for pain detection: A potentially useful tool for people living with dementia (CADTH Horizon Scan Report No. EN0047). Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK595121/ Care Innovation Summit. (n.d.). AI fall prevention with Nobi lights . https://careinnovationsummit.co.uk/ai-fall-prevention-with-nobi-lights/ CBRE. (n.d.). How AI is being adopted across the care homes sector . https://www.cbre.co.uk/insights/articles/how-ai-is-being-adopted-across-the-care-homes-sector Fuseproject. (n.d.). ElliQ — AI companion for elder care . https://fuseproject.com/case-studies/elliq/ Ghosh, R., Khan, N., Migovich, M., Tate, J. A., Maxwell, C. A., Newhouse, P. A., Scharre, D. W., Tan, A., Mion, L. C., & Sarkar, N. (2025). Engaging older adults and staff in the co-design and evaluation of socially assistive robot and virtual reality activities for long-term care: User-centered study. JMIR Aging , 8 , e75288. https://doi.org/10.2196/75288 InsightAce Analytic. (2026). AI in aging and elderly care market . https://www.insightaceanalytic.com/report/ai-in-aging-and-elderly-care-market/2696 Intuition Robotics. (n.d.). ElliQ . https://elliq.com/ McKnight’s Senior Living. (n.d.). Next-gen lamps combine smart lighting and passive monitoring for fewer senior falls incidents . https://www.mcknightsseniorliving.com/news/next-gen-lamps-combine-smart-lighting-and-passive-monitoring-for-fewer-senior-falls-incidents/ Mousa, D. (2025, October 15). AI is changing how we quantify pain. MIT Technology Review . https://www.technologyreview.com/2025/10/15/1125116/ai-is-changing-how-we-quantify-pain/ New York State Office for the Aging. (2023, August 1). NYSOFA’s rollout of AI companion robot ElliQ shows 95% reduction in loneliness . https://aging.ny.gov/news/nysofas-rollout-ai-companion-robot-elliq-shows-95-reduction-loneliness Nielsen Norman Group. (n.d.). Usability for senior citizens . https://www.nngroup.com/articles/usability-for-senior-citizens/ Nobi. (n.d.). Product . https://www.nobi.life/en/product PainChek. (n.d.). PainChek® universal pain management app . https://www.painchek.com/ Probst, F., Ratcliffe, J., Molteni, E., Mexia, N., Rees, J., Matcham, F., Antonelli, M., Tinker, A., Shi, Y., Ourselin, S., & Liu, W. (2024). A scoping review on human-centered design approaches and considerations in the design of technologies for loneliness and social isolation in older adults. Design Science , 10 , e28. https://doi.org/10.1017/dsj.2024.22 Sensi.AI. (n.d.). Home . https://www.sensi.ai/ Wilson, M., Doyle, J., Turner, J., Nugent, C., & O’Sullivan, D. (2024). Designing technology to support greater participation of people living with dementia in daily and meaningful activities. Digital Health , 10 , 20552076231222427. https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076231222427 Wilmink, G., Dupey, K., Alkire, S., Grote, J., Zobel, G., Fillit, H. M., & Movva, S. (2020). Artificial intelligence–powered digital health platform and wearable devices improve outcomes for older adults in assisted living communities: Pilot intervention study. JMIR Aging , 3 (2), e19554. https://doi.org/10.2196/19554 World Health Organization. (2025, October 1). Ageing and health . https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/ageing-and-health How AI may reshape elderly care was originally published in UX Collective on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story.