惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

Engineering at Meta
Engineering at Meta
T
Threatpost
P
Palo Alto Networks Blog
NISL@THU
NISL@THU
O
OpenAI News
Project Zero
Project Zero
G
GRAHAM CLULEY
P
Privacy International News Feed
A
Arctic Wolf
Microsoft Azure Blog
Microsoft Azure Blog
H
Help Net Security
M
MIT News - Artificial intelligence
T
Threat Research - Cisco Blogs
S
Security @ Cisco Blogs
Google DeepMind News
Google DeepMind News
B
Blog RSS Feed
D
Docker
aimingoo的专栏
aimingoo的专栏
博客园 - 【当耐特】
N
Netflix TechBlog - Medium
云风的 BLOG
云风的 BLOG
雷峰网
雷峰网
W
WeLiveSecurity
P
Proofpoint News Feed
腾讯CDC
Cloudbric
Cloudbric
S
Secure Thoughts
C
Check Point Blog
博客园 - Franky
T
The Exploit Database - CXSecurity.com
T
Troy Hunt's Blog
GbyAI
GbyAI
Security Archives - TechRepublic
Security Archives - TechRepublic
Application and Cybersecurity Blog
Application and Cybersecurity Blog
月光博客
月光博客
C
Cyber Attacks, Cyber Crime and Cyber Security
I
Intezer
TaoSecurity Blog
TaoSecurity Blog
L
Lohrmann on Cybersecurity
V
Visual Studio Blog
F
Fortinet All Blogs
博客园 - 叶小钗
C
CXSECURITY Database RSS Feed - CXSecurity.com
CTFtime.org: upcoming CTF events
CTFtime.org: upcoming CTF events
Recorded Future
Recorded Future
C
Cisco Blogs
博客园 - 司徒正美
Stack Overflow Blog
Stack Overflow Blog
Y
Y Combinator Blog
Apple Machine Learning Research
Apple Machine Learning Research

UX Collective - Medium

Designing the Human+AI system AI UX debt: A new bottleneck The case for catholic philosophy in ethical interface design What critical thinking means for senior designers (and how to apply it) Most AI tools make users faster. The best AI tools make users better. From faster pencil to AI Experience Architect: a designer’s path The waiting problem in AI products Be like water, The death of the empty state, AI for UX The big M&M’s color investigation you could’ve totally lived without How mobile apps are reshaping screening for cognitive decline Two gears, one compass: designing at velocity while sustaining quality Should we be kind to machines (for our own sake, really)? How to write a DESIGN.md file Claude can actually use Opening your place to the street The undo problem in AI products The one-dimensional pipe between two high-dimensional minds AI made everyone a creator, not a designer Can a typeface be safe? What do you do if your best design work is a small project? Low cortisol solution to big problems The death of the empty state in AI products Be like water: Rethinking the design process with AI How I use AI to partner on design problems Rethinking design with your hands in the AI world The thinking was never just mine Prompt is not interface, UI patterns that won’t survive, how to make Claude follow your design… Discovery is the work AI gives back The left-handed rope Everything I know about AI, I learned from a genie How to make Claude Code follow your design system in Figma The prompt is not an interface Designing data-intensive applications — advice for interaction designers Users own the present. You own the future. The first taste of Joy We built this. Now we own it. Why you need to protect your work more than ever The psychological fine print of AI The trick to designing agentic AI is learning how to think like a manager St. Augustine and AI’s false promise Pinning is not saving. Saving is not favoriting. Favoriting is not flagging. You skipped the first question. Now you’re adding AI. When AI decides and human signs off Collected consciousness, exhausting moment, UX Research with AI Don’t simply bolt on AI. Rethink from the ground up. The basketball playbook for AI builder teams Can AI make your dating life better? Usability, accessibility, and the human-AI paradigm Thoughtful AI Implementation for UXR Leaders A GenAI perplexed by color theory 10 UI patterns that won’t survive the AI shift What is AI really costing the planet? The most dangerous pronoun in design Staff designers aren’t about shipping the best work. That’s the point. The forgotten conversation problem in AI chat A fantastic voyage, the illusion of good taste, the art of subtraction The right touch: mapping AI presence to user intent The rulebook for designing AI experiences Designing with AI without losing your mind How AI may reshape elderly care What improv taught me about why innovation falls out of sync Working in the open How design leaders influence decisions without being in the room How to mitigate the risk of AI implementation in enterprise environments CSS you didn’t know you could style The chat box isn’t a UI paradigm. It’s what shipped. The web trained AI to deceive. Now designers have to untrain it. The art of subtraction in a world of infinite features What we behold, the trust-latency gap, designing haptics AI is ruining the way you talk about your work The deceptive nature of today’s AI conversation design and how to fix it Rethinking the shape of design teams in an AI world Becoming an AI-native designer The misrepresentation of “good taste” as a core design skill Test smart: how to approach AI and stay sane? Are we makers by nature — or consumers by design? Your AI agent can read your codebase. It doesn’t know your product. Folder instructions — Instructions for system-level AI Haptics: how to build a consistent cross-platform solution and align code with Figma I watched the manosphere documentary; here is how design is making things worse. Autopilot, agentic AI, and the dangers of imperfect metaphors Oh, but there’s one more thing We become what we behold AI, UX, and the factory model The trust gap in healthcare AI isn’t about the AI How to turn your competitor’s worst reviews into your strongest design argument The erosion of design authority, burnout problems, invisible customers Most products don’t need tone of voice — they need a point Designing adaptive teams The trust-latency gap: why the future of UX is intentionally slower Rethinking design critique Notes from the people building your future taste.md Social media on trial The old design workshop is dead. Long live design workshops. Careful, liable UX is a thing now Beyond the user: why design needs to widen its circle Designing for the invisible customer The UX ground is shaking, synthetic users, building perspective Data models: the shared language your AI and team are both missing We didn’t mean to build this- engagement at any cost
Product design in 2026: the beginning of a fantastic voyage?
Kike Peña · 2026-04-21 · via UX Collective - Medium
The invisible walls for designers have been broken down. Maybe we don’t know it yet, but this year is the perfect time to start reframing the influence and vision of product design within and beyond companies. All the walls that might keep us in secondary or even tertiary roles are down, and this is the time to start using what we have learned so far to discover a new design value that transcends mockups and points to the entire business. In my experience in the industry, historically, all product design constraints have been driven by dismissing the value design can bring to companies and their products. Although this value is obvious, some companies and leaders still resist seeing design teams from a more protagonist perspective. Still, the point of this article is not to bring back old complaints or traumas, but to plant a new idea among the design community: the time of being more protagonist in the industry is here, and it might last for a long time. Let me start on some common ground by pointing out where we were a few years ago and how the picture started to shift for us. The “walls” we struggled with in companies that delimited or sometimes stopped the design’s influence now seem to be falling away because of a new digital work revolution. The product conversation wall In some companies, there exists an executive-all-mighty product team vision in which this single unit sets the north star and makes all decisions. This product team is responsible for driving key conversations with users, stakeholders, competitors, and planning. The main purpose of this “executive” approach is to have one visible face for the product, serving as a messenger across stakeholders, business needs, and multiple areas, whose only job is to receive and execute what product teams bring to the table, with no room for negotiation. This production model obviously didn’t work (at least for me, it is a flawed way of working) , and it is so stressful for people to be the only ones responsible for handling information from multiple communication channels and plans. What was the design influence here? Since design teams and other areas were relegated to a blind production cycle, the influence was almost null; only in some conversation spaces, designers were able to speak up about questions or product improvement, but as this model structure worked, all ideas were confined to an endless backlog without having the opportunity to surface and shine. When did this wall fall? To be fair, this model died a long time ago; I want to believe it (although you can see it in some traditional companies today). When the product triad arrived in the industry, people realized it was better to drive a product through a multidisciplinary team approach, understanding business, user experience, and engineering as a whole. How to take advantage of this from now on? Since all product decisions are now made with a clear understanding of all product perspectives towards a common goal, designers can understand business decisions firsthand and even become more proactive in the decision-making process. Business understanding is no longer an ethereal conversation for us, and it’s surprising to see how some designers have a special talent for adding business value through their expertise. Now, since designers are close to users and the business, they can expand their influence by creating design solutions that are perfectly aligned with the business vision and drive growth. This new influence range also opens the door to engaging high-stakeholders and having hard conversations, increasing communication skills that were nonexistent before. The code wall The fall of this wall (partially, maybe?) is the newest and most rewarding improvement for designers to celebrate since AI hit the market, well, for the vibe-coding enthusiasts. On the other hand, some designers are still refusing to enter the code conversation due to several reasons I’m not going to question here. The thing is, some years ago, the ultimate expression of functional design was recreating product flows in external tools like InVision or Zeplin. To be honest, this was a groundbreaking improvement for designers at the time, but it was also limited in its ability to represent an entire user journey with multiple variables and edge cases (it was only a sequence of static images) . I stopped using those tools, and I assume they have evolved over the years, but even so, with the transition from a design file to code via AI, the biggest gap between designers and productive environments has been closed. What was the design influence here? Before AI, code language was a black box for designers; most of them. From time to time, rare designers could talk about JavaScript, databases, or HTML syntax, making them a sort of unicorn. For the rest of the designers like me, our influence in code reviews was limited; in only some situations did devs show lines of code to explain why our design was not viable, and that was it. Most of the time, many of the design ideas were discarded due to engineering “limitations,” so our ideas were always weakened. When did this wall fall? Since the AI boom, designers have discovered a new door to cross. The proliferation of AI companies whose purpose is to facilitate code transition for everyone has been the perfect catalyst for accelerating the disappearance of this barrier. Today, seeing people from different backgrounds and professions “making code” with Vibe coding tools and building businesses from scratch is to embrace the new reality that coding is no longer exclusive to specialized teams. How to take advantage of this from now on? You can argue a lot about the quality of code produced by a vibe coding experience; in this regard, there is a lot of controversy today, which I agree with, without renouncing my full expertise in this matter. Still, even with this variable taken into account, designers can now have their own code live for multiple purposes, which again expands their influence. Having the full construction path, from business to design to code, I believe designers can use a set of tools and skills to be the person in tech companies who can manipulate three different languages and create value. From the old triad model, designers have a huge advantage: the design itself. No one else has that ability. Even when creating designs with AI, the results aren't perfect, and engineers and PMs can’t spot issues or generate ideas. The innovation wall Who said designers can’t bring ideas to the table to change things? They are the ones for this job. Some years ago, innovation came from executives who dictated what to do with the product or the company’s dynamics, and sometimes they were not connected to audiences or the market. That wall of innovative thinking fell long ago when the product decision-making was split into a multidisciplinary perspective. Over the years, all designers thought that the only place to create value was in interfaces, but the truth is that even with simple design ideas, we can create revolution in companies or products. What was the design influence here? Some years ago, innovation in digital products was perceived by how well or how aesthetically pleasing the user interface elements were. It’s not new that, years ago, highly realistic visual metaphors were king when building websites. After that, we fell into a “flat language” in which solid colors and big fonts dominated design trends over the years, but to me, those changes were merely visual; the influence here was focused solely on communication. How to take advantage of this from now on? Since designers are more proactive in product decision-making, we began shifting the product approach to a more user-centric and business-centered experience, leaving behind the field of communication to enter and reframing how we communicate within teams, thereby creating more innovative processes and outcomes. The power of UX is so relevant that even simple tweaks to internal processes can drive innovation not only in how a product behaves but also within the company. Now we have the technology that shortens the gap between our way of thinking and the impact we want to achieve, but a tool alone is not enough to validate this impact. That’s why I believe that, from this year on, we can see the evolution of design as we know it. The rise of the new designer/builder New standards: the power of imagination My colleague and VP of Design, Carlos Pinilla, said something the other day that blew my mind. It was a statement that reframes designers’ skills nowadays, now that we have all the tools at hand and the walls have fallen. “New designers should be measured on how big their imagination is, instead of how much they know about tools.” — Carlos Pinilla. This idea complements my thesis on how a new design approach and influence can emerge from this technological revolution. Now we have the tools, but as I said before, tools by themselves only deliver limited or generic solutions, and that is where a big imagination can make a difference. This design impact can extend beyond interfaces, thereby expanding designers’ influence. Another point raised by Carlos is that design influence can’t be broadened if the company is not aligned with this direction of innovation. Not having a clear vision for design teams will build all the walls that, as I said, limit our full potential; those are the types of companies to avoid. On the contrary, companies that start thinking about using product design as a foundational innovation vision, along with new AI tools, are places where invention from another perspective can thrive. The end of manual design and the rise of strategic design Let’s be honest here: design as we knew it is over. Taking days, weeks, months, or even years in Figma to create components, interfaces, and connect prototypes can start to sound expensive for companies; this is an ugly truth, but after all, the truth. Why do we need an army of designers or engineers to validate an idea? That’s a question to start thinking about, since we have advanced tools like Claude Design or Google Stitch (among others) that accelerate the product creation. In my opinion, the craft is shifting toward a new way of thinking, where we delegate the craft to tools to accelerate the process. Still, as designers, our experience and expertise can be exploited in new ways in strategic fields for companies and businesses. Deliver complete tools and services, not just mockups ; that’s the new design destiny. As I mentioned above, all the walls that might keep us in secondary or even tertiary roles are down, and this is the time to start using what we have learned so far to discover a new design value that transcends mockups and points to the entire business, functional product, and services. My question for you is: how do you want to be the protagonist in this new scenario without falling behind? To write this article, I want to credit all the fantastic information sources and other authors who have written about related topics, each from an exciting, different perspective. The Year You Finally Follow Through UX Design 2026: from asking to choosing in the age of abundance Experiment Like a Child, Build Like a Founder 10 UX Design Trends Driving Business Growth in 2026 Product design in 2026: the beginning of a fantastic voyage? was originally published in UX Collective on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story.