InertiaRSS Track and read blogs, news, and tech you care about
Read Original Open in InertiaRSS

Recommended Feeds

博客园 - 司徒正美
V
V2EX
T
Tailwind CSS Blog
有赞技术团队
有赞技术团队
aimingoo的专栏
aimingoo的专栏
Apple Machine Learning Research
Apple Machine Learning Research
IT之家
IT之家
Blog — PlanetScale
Blog — PlanetScale
A
About on SuperTechFans
月光博客
月光博客
T
The Blog of Author Tim Ferriss
宝玉的分享
宝玉的分享
Martin Fowler
Martin Fowler
博客园 - 聂微东
The GitHub Blog
The GitHub Blog
V
Visual Studio Blog
WordPress大学
WordPress大学
酷 壳 – CoolShell
酷 壳 – CoolShell
Engineering at Meta
Engineering at Meta
GbyAI
GbyAI

阮一峰的网络日志

科技爱好者周刊(第 396 期):互联网通信的替代方案 科技爱好者周刊(第 396 期):互联网通信的替代方案 - 阮一峰的网络日志 科技爱好者周刊(第 395 期):软件开发的第三种方式 科技爱好者周刊(第 395 期):软件开发的第三种方式 - 阮一峰的网络日志 科技爱好者周刊(第 393 期):脑腐状态 科技爱好者周刊(第 392 期):axios 投毒与好莱坞式骗术 科技爱好者周刊(第 391 期):AI 的贫富分化 科技爱好者周刊(第 390 期):没有语料,大模型就是智障 套壳中国大模型撑起500亿美元估值?扒一扒 Cursor 的"套壳"疑云 科技爱好者周刊(第 389 期):未来如何招聘程序员 科技爱好者周刊(第 388 期):测试是新的护城河 零安装的"云养虾":ArkClaw 使用指南 科技爱好者周刊(第 387 期):你是领先的 科技爱好者周刊(第 386 期):当外卖员接入 AI 字节全家桶 Seed 2.0 + TRAE 玩转 Skill 科技爱好者周刊(第 385 期):马斯克害怕中国车企吗? 智谱旗舰 GLM-5 实测:对比 Opus 4.6 和 GPT-5.3-Codex 科技爱好者周刊(第 384 期):为什么软件股下跌 科技爱好者周刊(第 383 期):你是第几级 AI 编程 Kimi 的一体化,Manus 的分层 科技爱好者周刊(第 382 期):独立软件的黄昏 AI native Workspace 也许是智能体的下一阶段 科技爱好者周刊(第 381 期):中国 AI 大模型领导者在想什么 科技爱好者周刊(第 380 期):为什么人们拥抱"不对称收益" 科技爱好者周刊(第 379 期):《硅谷钢铁侠》摘录 我如何用 AI 处理历史遗留代码:MiniMax M2.1 升级体验 科技爱好者周刊(第 378 期):预测是新的互联网热点 科技爱好者周刊(第 377 期):14万美元的贫困线 科技爱好者周刊(第 376 期):太空数据中心的争议 科技爱好者周刊(第 375 期):一扇门的 Bug 终于有人做了 Subagent,TRAE 国内版 SOLO 模式来了 科技爱好者周刊(第 374 期):6GHz 的问题 VS Code 使用国产大模型 MiniMax M2 教程 科技爱好者周刊(第 373 期):数据模型是新产品的核心 国产大模型接入 Claude Code 教程:以 Doubao-Seed-Code 为例 科技爱好者周刊(第 372 期):软件界面如何设计 大模型比拼:MiniMax M2 vs GLM 4.6 vs Claude Sonnet 4.5 科技爱好者周刊(第 371 期):一个乐观主义者的专访 科技爱好者周刊(第 370 期):正确的代码高亮 错误处理:异常好于状态码 科技爱好者周刊(第 369 期):Tim 与罗永浩的对谈 科技爱好者周刊(第 368 期):不要这样管理软件团队 一天之内,智谱和 Anthropic 都发了最强编程模型 科技爱好者周刊(第 367 期):Nano Banana 的几个妙用 科技爱好者周刊(第 366 期):旧金山疯狂的 AI 广告 科技爱好者周刊(第 365 期):流量变现正在崩塌 科技爱好者周刊(第 364 期):最难还原的魔方 科技爱好者周刊(第 363 期):最好懂的神经网络解释 科技爱好者周刊(第 362 期):GitHub 工程师谈系统设计 科技爱好者周刊(第 361 期):暗网 Tor 安全吗?
The limits of energy
阮一峰 · 2022-07-27 · via 阮一峰的网络日志

I.

U.S. Energy Administration statistics show that the U.S. energy consumption from 1650 to 2009 had an average annual growth rate of 2.9%.

[Image description] U.S. energy consumption, with the red line indicating an average annual growth rate of 2.9%.

You might think, 2.9% is not a very high growth rate. To some extent, that's true. Over the seventy years from 1949 to 2019, China's electricity consumption increased 1,978 times, which translates to an annual growth rate of 11.5%.

So it seems, a 2.9% growth rate is relatively mild.

However, a physicist from the University of California doesn't see it that way. He raised a question that has never been asked: If humans continue to produce and consume energy at this rate, what will happen?

Next, I will introduceHis calculation results. I don't know if his calculation is correct, but I think his reasoning is right.

He later wrote a book called"Energy and Human Ambitions on a Finite Planet" (Energy and Human Ambitions on a Finite Planet), which is available for free download online. The book contains detailed calculations, and those interested can check it out.

II.

He first assumed that the global energy growth rate is 2.3% per year. This makes the calculations easier, and this rate is exactly equal to a tenfold increase every century.

At this rate, in the year 2122, a hundred years later, the world's energy will be ten times what it is today; in the year 2222, two hundred years later, it will be one hundred times what it is today.

So, the question arises.How can humans increase energy to 100 times today's level within two hundred years?

Fossil energy is impossible, while solar energy is feasible. According to Wikipedia, the solar energy reaching Earth in one hour is more than the energy humans consume in a year.

If we make full use of solar energy, it is indeed possible to increase energy to 100 times today's level. However, in that case, every inch of land on Earth would need to be covered with solar panels.

Calculations show that maintaining a 2.3% growth rate for 400 years would require covering all of Earth's surface (including the oceans) with solar panels; maintaining it for 1350 years would mean human energy needs would equal the entire sun's energy; and maintaining it for 2500 years would mean human energy needs would equal the entire galaxy's energy.

[Image description] A 2.3% energy growth rate would lead to humans needing the entire galaxy's energy in over two thousand years.

This is obviously impossible. However, even without considering the distant future, just maintaining a 2.3% energy growth rate in the coming decades, humans will face a serious problem: heat dissipation.

III.

Physics tells us that as long as energy does work, heat must be generated.

Humans consume more and more energy, inevitably producing more heat, and the Earth's heat dissipation problem becomes increasingly severe.

The Earth primarily radiates heat into space through infrared radiation. However, the increase in greenhouse gases obstructs infrared radiation from leaving the atmosphere, trapping more and more heat on the Earth's surface, leading to global warming.

The more heat humans generate, the more heat remains on the Earth's surface, and greenhouse gases exacerbate this problem. Therefore, the extent of global warming is directly correlated with human energy consumption.

In 2020, the average global temperature was approximately 14.9°C. If the energy growth rate remains at 2.3%, in 350 years, the global average temperature will reach body temperature at 37°C, in 450 years it will reach the boiling point of water at 100°C, in 750 years it will reach the melting point of steel at 1500°C, and in 950 years it will reach the surface temperature of the sun at 5500°C.

[Image Description] If the energy growth rate remains at 2.3%, within a thousand years, surface temperatures will be as high as the surface of the sun.

This is entirely reasonable: if humans generate energy on Earth comparable to that of the sun, then the surface of the Earth would certainly have the same temperature as the sun's surface, let alone that the Earth is much smaller than the sun.

Four,

United Nations It is estimated that if the global average temperature rises by 4.5 degrees, half of the species will face the risk of extinction. If temperatures continue to rise, humans may also face extinction.

Therefore, if the energy growth rate of 2.3% remains for another one or two hundred years, Earth's heat dissipation problem will pose a survival crisis for humans.

Everyone can think this way: the current energy consumption of humans has already caused summer temperatures to rise to 40 degrees. If a hundred years later, energy consumption becomes ten times the current level, how high would the temperature be then?

The conclusion is clearly that energy cannot maintain a long-term growth rate of 2.3%. According to the current energy growth rate, the time left for humans is already very limited, it is likely that within a hundred years, humans will have to stop energy growth to alleviate the Earth's cooling problem.

Energy growth is strongly correlated with economic growth. Therefore, within a hundred years, human economic growth may also stagnate.

The best-case scenario is that by then, the world's population has already started to decline, so there would be no need for so much energy, and living standards would not decline significantly.

Five,

ideal is ideal, but the reality is that the world currently has an urgent demand for energy, and there are signs of acceleration.

Harvard University this year hasA studyto estimate how many air conditioners are still needed worldwide.

They found that 2.8 billion people live in the hottest regions of the world, and as temperatures rise, all of them will need air conditioners. However, only about 8% of them currently have air conditioners in their homes, while the rest are eager to get them as soon as possible.

[Image description] Air conditioners are the most desired home appliances for Indians.

Harvard University estimates that by 2050, the proportion of people needing air conditioners will be 92% in Germany, 96% in the United States, and 99% in India and Indonesia.

The current penetration rate of air conditioners in the United States is 90%, so it only needs to install air conditioners for another 6% of the population. However, the penetration rates of air conditioners in India and Indonesia are currently 5% and 9% respectively, which means that air conditioners need to be installed for more than 90% of the population.

These two countries are populous nations. Indonesia has 270 million people, and India has 1.4 billion people. Providing air conditioners for everyone will require an astronomical amount of energy.

Therefore, in the coming decades, global energy will certainly grow rapidly to meet the demand for air conditioning. Governments will have to increase energy supply because air conditioning is no longer a luxury but a necessary device for survival, otherwise high temperatures could lead to casualties.

VI.

This is the severe situation humanity faces: increased energy leads to rising temperatures; rising temperatures, in turn, require more energy for cooling, creating a vicious cycle.

As mentioned above, humanity's period of energy growth may only last for the next century. How can human society, within such a short time, endure global warming while achieving economic transformation and reducing energy consumption, remains an uncertain and pessimistic path.

(End)