• A critical New Yorker profile reignited long-standing concerns about Sam Altman’s leadership and trustworthiness
• There were two separate attempted attacks at Altman’s home over the weekend
• Altman responded with an intense and personal blog post calling for de-escalation of rhetoric around AI

For Sam Altman, the weekend was a chaotic and at times dangerous series of crises. The OpenAI chief executive had faced questions after a deep New Yorker investigation leading to an intense and emotional blog post response, all amid two attacks at his home in roughly forty-eight hours.

The New Yorker story drew on over 100 interviews and documents to revisit the events around Altman’s brief ouster from OpenAI in 2023. It cast Altman as an executive surrounded by doubts about his honesty and commitment to safety over power

For Altman, whose public image has long depended on sounding like a calm adult around squabbling children, the article threatened something more serious than embarrassment. It sharpened a wider backlash already building around OpenAI, including criticism from AI safety advocates, artists, publishers, regulators, and rivals who argue the company has become too powerful and too slippery.

Article continues below

An attack and angry words

Then at 4 a.m. on Friday, police reported someone threw a Molotov cocktail at Altman’s home and fled, appearing at OpenAI’s headquarters and threatening to burn the building down. Court documents say he carried writings opposed to artificial intelligence and warning of “our impending extinction.”

Altman responded not with a corporate statement but with a very personal blog post. He posted a family photo and wrote, “Images have power, I hope. Normally we try to be pretty private, but in this case I am sharing a photo in the hopes that it might dissuade the next person from throwing a Molotov cocktail at our house, no matter what they think about me.” It was a striking move from a chief executive who normally prefers polished futurism to raw confession.

He also made clear that he saw a connection between the surrounding rhetoric and the violence. “Words have power too,” Altman wrote. “There was an incendiary article about me a few days ago.” He said he had initially brushed aside the suggestion that the story appeared “at a time of great anxiety about AI” and had made things “more dangerous” for him. “Now I am awake in the middle of the night and pissed,” he wrote, “and thinking that I have underestimated the power of words and narratives.”

Apology and counterpoints

Altman did not simply lash out. He mixed grievance with confession.

“I am not proud of being conflict averse,” he wrote. “I am not proud of handling myself badly in a conflict with our previous board that led to a huge mess for the company," he wrote. “I have made many other mistakes throughout the insane trajectory of OpenAI; I am a flawed person in the center of an exceptionally complex situation.” He also wrote, “I am sorry to people I’ve hurt and wish I had learned more faster.”

He presented himself as both fallible and indispensable. He insisted that “the fear and anxiety about AI is justified” and argued that power over AI “cannot be too concentrated,” even as OpenAI remains one of the firms doing the most to concentrate it.

Then, on Sunday morning, before the story could cool, the weekend got worse. San Francisco police responded to reports of possible shots fired near Altman's home and arrested two people. No injuries were reported, but the symbolism was impossible to miss. A tech leader arguing that the temperature around AI had become dangerous suddenly had multiple violent incidents at his home and office.

Backlash all over

Altman is facing angry tirades from multiple directions now, though much of it has nothing to do with the violence directly. Issues of trust, accountability, and the amount of power that now sits inside a handful of AI companies are ripe. Public feeling around AI is no longer just argumentative or academic.

Altman closed his post with a line that feels almost glib in context. “We should de escalate the rhetoric and tactics and try to have fewer explosions in fewer homes, figuratively and literally.”

In a matter of days, Sam Altman’s role shifted from a familiar kind of tech-world lightning rod to something more exposed and uneasy. The criticism surrounding him is not going away, and neither is the broader anxiety about AI that feeds it. What changed over the weekend is how visible and volatile that tension became, spilling beyond articles and arguments into something harder to contain. Altman may have called for a cooling of rhetoric, but the moment suggests the conversation around him, and the technology he represents, is only getting louder, sharper, and more difficult to control.

Follow TechRadar on Google News and add us as a preferred source to get our expert news, reviews, and opinion in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button!

And of course you can also follow TechRadar on TikTok for news, reviews, unboxings in video form, and get regular updates from us on WhatsApp too.

Eric Hal Schwartz is a freelance writer for TechRadar with more than 15 years of experience covering the intersection of the world and technology. For the last five years, he served as head writer for Voicebot.ai and was on the leading edge of reporting on generative AI and large language models. He's since become an expert on the products of generative AI models, such as OpenAI’s ChatGPT, Anthropic’s Claude, Google Gemini, and every other synthetic media tool. His experience runs the gamut of media, including print, digital, broadcast, and live events. Now, he's continuing to tell the stories people want and need to hear about the rapidly evolving AI space and its impact on their lives. Eric is based in New York City.