“The supreme art of war is to subdue the enemy without fighting.”

A quote attributed to the renowned military strategist Sun Tzu. It describes the ultimate strategy: win before the battle even begins. In many ways, it’s exactly what cyberwarfare represents today.

Only now, emerging technologies are bringing that principle into the spotlight. AI is accelerating cyber operations. Quantum computing threatens to challenge the very foundations of encrypted trust. Meanwhile, automation, cloud and interconnected systems have expanded the blast radius of compromise as well as the reach of digital conflict.

Individually, each of these technologies represents a powerful shift. But together, they have the potential to rewrite the rules of cyberwarfare. The convergence of these technologies amplifies capability on both sides. But attackers only need to be right once.

What once looked like isolated disruption is now becoming something far more strategic: the ability to undermine an enemy long before the battle begins. So, the real question organizations must now ask is: what happens when the technologies driving innovation begin rewriting the rules of cyberwarfare?

When technologies amplify each other

AI is already a staple within cyber operations; lowering the barrier to entry, allowing adversaries to automate reconnaissance, generate exploits and scale campaigns at an unprecedented pace. It’s getting harder to keep up and the data speaks for itself.

New research shows how 65% of global IT decision-makers say the current pace of AI innovation is already outrunning cybersecurity policies and regulations, while nearly eight in ten (79%) are concerned that nation-states will use AI to develop more sophisticated and targeted cyberattacks.

But what makes this shift particularly dangerous is how quickly the human element is disappearing from the attack chain. Cyber operations are being driven by autonomous systems capable of scanning networks, identifying vulnerabilities and weaponizing exploits in seconds. We’ve entered into the era of the “agentic swarm” — autonomous, goal-seeking AI agents that discover vulnerabilities and weaponize exploits in seconds.

However, the advent of quantum computing introduces an even deeper structural risk. It’s a technology that’s not even commercially available, yet a quarter of IT leaders already fear quantum computing could become the greatest existential cyber risk if weaponized.

Geopolitical competition is only heightening this fear. For example, China claims it’s already testing experimental quantum-based cyber weapons designed specifically for warfare, while Russia is developing quantum navigation systems to counter electronic warfare.

These advancements are compressing years of capability development into a much shorter window. And yet, many defensive responses remain foundational at best. Measures such as multi-factor authentication and password policies are still widely relied upon, but they’re no longer sufficient on their own in the face of autonomous, agentic threats.

This is further hampered by growing operational gaps and an ever-expanding attack surface. If you look at AI alone, there’s evidence that 71% of employees are already using unvetted AI tools, where proprietary corporate code is being fed directly into public models, giving bad actors a digital map to an organization’s backdoor.

And yet, the biggest challenge lies in that convergence. When these technologies begin amplifying one another, cyber conflict evolves into something far more complex to understand and control.

It creates new pathways for exposure across interconnected systems, software and infrastructure. In fact, 65% of IT decision-makers believe this convergence will drive an unprecedented escalation in cyber conflict capabilities, expanding the ways organizations can be exposed.

So, how do you prepare for a future threat that’s already converging?

Cyber exposure management for the next era

Put simply, you cannot stop an autonomous agent with just a manual ticket or a human analyst; we must move to machine-on-machine weaponry. The most effective shift organizations can now make is moving away from reactive security strategies toward a deeper, continuous understanding of cyber exposure.

In an environment where emerging technologies and interconnected systems create countless new pathways for compromise, resilience depends on knowing how risk forms across the entire digital ecosystem, not just responding once it’s exploited. This requires a different lens when viewing cybersecurity.

Rather than treating vulnerabilities, alerts or incidents as isolated technical problems, organizations must understand how assets, software, identities and infrastructure connect across IT, cloud, OT and increasingly complex supply chains. The real risk rarely sits in a single vulnerability; it emerges from the relationships between systems, and the pathways attackers can exploit between them.

Exposure-centric security focuses on making those relationships visible. By continuously mapping assets, dependencies and access paths across the environment, security teams gain the context needed to identify where risk is truly concentrated and which exposures could have the greatest operational impact.

This becomes even more important as emerging technologies accelerate the pace of digital change. AI is already expanding the scale and complexity organizations must defend.

Quantum computing threatens to push this even further. Attackers are already adapting to this trajectory, using AI tools to probe systems and identify weaknesses at machine speed while some nation-state actors adopt “harvest now, decrypt later” tactics; collecting encrypted data today in anticipation that future quantum breakthroughs will render it readable.

Therefore, to keep pace, defenders must apply automation and AI in the same way: analyzing vast volumes of assets, behavioral and vulnerability data in real time to surface the exposures that matter most. When done effectively, this shifts security teams away from chasing thousands of alerts and toward anticipating how adversaries might move through interconnected systems.

In this model, preparedness is no longer defined by how quickly organizations respond to attacks, but by how clearly they understand their digital environment before those attacks occur.

Preparing for the next era of cyber conflict

Emerging technologies are accelerating cyber conflict in ways few defensive models were built to contain and in ways we’re still yet to fully understand. But waiting for these capabilities to mature before acting is a wildly dangerous assumption, particularly when bad actors are already experimenting with them in the wild.

The challenge now facing organizations is speed. The window between vulnerability discovery, exploitation and real-world impact is shrinking rapidly as technologies converge and automation removes the human bottleneck from cyber operations.

In this environment, resilience now means continuously understanding digital ecosystems, while anticipating how exposure forms and adapting as quickly as the technologies that are reshaping the threat landscape. Now is the time to act.

Because in an era where cyberwarfare moves at machine speed, the ultimate strategic advantage remains the one Sun Tzu described centuries ago: winning the battle before it ever begins.

We've featured the best encryption software.

This article was produced as part of TechRadar Pro Perspectives, our channel to feature the best and brightest minds in the technology industry today.

The views expressed here are those of the author and are not necessarily those of TechRadarPro or Future plc. If you are interested in contributing find out more here: https://www.techradar.com/pro/perspectives-how-to-submit