惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

T
The Exploit Database - CXSecurity.com
V
Vulnerabilities – Threatpost
Google DeepMind News
Google DeepMind News
Attack and Defense Labs
Attack and Defense Labs
Webroot Blog
Webroot Blog
cs.CV updates on arXiv.org
cs.CV updates on arXiv.org
TaoSecurity Blog
TaoSecurity Blog
I
Intezer
Application and Cybersecurity Blog
Application and Cybersecurity Blog
N
News | PayPal Newsroom
S
Security Affairs
T
Tor Project blog
P
Proofpoint News Feed
Exploit-DB.com RSS Feed
Exploit-DB.com RSS Feed
S
Security @ Cisco Blogs
H
Heimdal Security Blog
Hacker News: Ask HN
Hacker News: Ask HN
Help Net Security
Help Net Security
U
Unit 42
云风的 BLOG
云风的 BLOG
The Hacker News
The Hacker News
Cisco Talos Blog
Cisco Talos Blog
量子位
F
Full Disclosure
cs.AI updates on arXiv.org
cs.AI updates on arXiv.org
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
博客园 - 叶小钗
有赞技术团队
有赞技术团队
T
Troy Hunt's Blog
P
Privacy & Cybersecurity Law Blog
Forbes - Security
Forbes - Security
人人都是产品经理
人人都是产品经理
L
Lohrmann on Cybersecurity
Apple Machine Learning Research
Apple Machine Learning Research
Microsoft Security Blog
Microsoft Security Blog
博客园 - Franky
腾讯CDC
AI
AI
Last Week in AI
Last Week in AI
Latest news
Latest news
Google Online Security Blog
Google Online Security Blog
N
Netflix TechBlog - Medium
Engineering at Meta
Engineering at Meta
GbyAI
GbyAI
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
IT之家
IT之家
Martin Fowler
Martin Fowler
Blog — PlanetScale
Blog — PlanetScale
V2EX - 技术
V2EX - 技术
酷 壳 – CoolShell
酷 壳 – CoolShell

Sysdig Blog

Masterclass: AI is more than ChatGPT and LLMs CVE-2026-39987 update: How attackers weaponized marimo to deploy a blockchain botnet via HuggingFace Kubernetes 1.36 - New security features 5 steps to securing AI workloads Marimo OSS Python Notebook RCE: From Disclosure to Exploitation in Under 10 Hours Security briefing: March 2026 The Sysdig MCP server is now available in AWS Marketplace Risk isn’t reduced until you take action: How teams resolve issues in the cloud AI infrastructure security: Why it deserves its own category Three pillars for building effective runtime-powered cloud defense, the right way Closing the cloud security gap with runtime security Seeing risk isn’t stopping it: Why visibility alone isn’t enough TeamPCP expands: Supply chain compromise spreads from Trivy to Checkmarx GitHub Actions AI coding agents are running on your machines — Do you know what they're doing? Runtime security for AI coding agents: Protecting AI-assisted development How runtime insights power every cloud security use case CVE-2026-33017: How attackers compromised Langflow AI pipelines in 20 hours Inline Cloud Response: Accelerating AWS threat containment for SOC teams Runtime malware detection for AWS Fargate Detecting CVE-2026-3288 & CVE-2026-24512: Ingress-nginx configuration injection vulnerabilities for Kubernetes Malware detection with Sysdig Security briefing: February 2026 Leveling up Kubernetes Posture: From baselines to risk-aware admission Eliminating runtime blind spots: How CleanStart and Sysdig build continuous trust across the container lifecycle LLMjacking: From Emerging Threat to Black Market Reality Real risks live at runtime: Why CISOs must care about deep telemetry in 2026 Sysdig named a Leader in the Forrester Wave™: Cloud Native Application Protection Solutions, Q1 2026 How to run rootless containers AI-assisted cloud intrusion achieves admin access in 8 minutes Security briefing: January 2026 Securing GPU-accelerated AI workloads in Oracle Kubernetes Engine Bringing OSS runtime security to AWS: Falco integration with AWS Security Hub CSPM Our customers have spoken: Sysdig rated a Strong Performer in Gartner® Voice of the Customer for Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms Protecting sensitive business data in preparation for the organization's Gen AI VoidLink threat analysis: Sysdig discovers C2-compiled kernel rootkits AI is still a workload: A practical guide to securing AI workloads How threat actors are using self-hosted GitHub Actions runners as backdoors How Sysdig Sage delivers AI-powered, real-world vulnerability management Security briefing: December 2025 Top 10 ways to get breached in 2026 EtherRAT dissected: How a React2Shell implant delivers 5 payloads through blockchain C2 Introducing runtime file integrity monitoring and response with Sysdig FIM How to detect multi-stage attacks with runtime behavioral analytics EtherRAT: DPRK uses novel Ethereum implant in React2Shell attacks Detecting React2Shell: The maximum-severity RCE vulnerability affecting React Server Components and Next.js The rise of AI agents: How autonomous AI Is transforming cloud security Kubernetes 1.35 - New security features The Urgency of Securing AI Workloads for CISOs Security briefing: November 2025 Cloud security, the right way: What the industry should demand (and why "good enough" isn't) Return of the Shai-Hulud worm affects over 25,000 GitHub repositories Detecting CVE-2024-1086: The decade-old Linux kernel vulnerability that’s being actively exploited in ransomware campaigns What’s old is new again: How to demystify AI security with AIBOMs Securing Kubernetes with agentic cloud security How agentic cloud security reduces real risks Hunting reverse shells: How the Sysdig Threat Research Team builds smarter detection rules Shifting left with AI and MCP: Sysdig + Amazon Q Developer How Falco and Stratoshark close the gap between open source runtime detection and deep forensic analysis Investigating security issues with ChatGPT and the GitHub MCP server New runc vulnerabilities allow container escape: CVE-2025-31133, CVE-2025-52565, CVE-2025-52881 Harden your LLM security with OWASP Security briefing: October 2025 How agentic AI is changing cloud security Kubernetes Incident Response: Detect, investigate, and contain in under 10 minutes Sysdig recognized as a Cloud Security Leader in Latio Tech Cloud Security Market Report AI echolocation of cloud risks using Sysdig & Snyk MCP servers Sysdig MCP Server: Bridging AI and cloud security insights Understanding CVE-2025-49844: “RediShell” Critical Remote Code Execution in Redis How Sysdig secures your containers and Kubernetes Sysdig Security Briefing: September 2025 Cloud security, the right way: The 3 pillars of real-time defense Open source spotlight: Bringing web application security to Falco with Falcoya's Nginx plugin Malicious NPM packages: Are you exposed? AI for SOC teams: 5 cloud security prompts to start your day with Sysdig Sage™ Shai-Hulud: The novel self-replicating worm infecting hundreds of NPM packages ZynorRAT technical analysis: Reverse engineering a novel, Turkish Go-based RAT Modern vulnerability management, built for the cloud Build your AWS incident response playbook with open source tools 2025 Gartner® CNAPP Market Guide: Runtime visibility is no longer optional Threat hunting with Sysdig: Uncovering “IngressNightmare” Open source spotlight: From alerts to action with AI-powered Falco Vanguard From triage to action: How Sysdig’s agentic cloud security platform slashes noise and accelerates remediation The vision comes to life: Agentic cloud security with Sysdig Sage™ Data security findings: A technical deep dive Connecting runtime to source: Sysdig and Semgrep integration Fix what matters, faster: How Sysdig and Semgrep are unifying security without silos – from code to runtime Defending sensitive data with Sysdig Secure Redefining cloud security, the right way Join the movement: The Sysdig Open Source Community is live A smarter, safer cloud in the age of AI Unifying detection and response: Sysdig + Cortex XSOAR for security at cloud speed The future of security is open, and it needs a unified hub: The Sysdig Open Source Community is here CVE-2025-53104: Command injection via GitHub Actions workflow in gluestack-ui Why MCP server security is critical for AI-driven enterprises What’s new in Sysdig — June 2025 AI-powered CNAPP with Sysdig Sage™ Revolutionizing Cybersecurity Search with Sysdig Sage™ Sysdig Threat Bulletin: Iranian Cyber Threats The end of the prioritization-only era: Vulnerability management needs action Dangerous by default: Insecure GitHub Actions found in MITRE, Splunk, and other open source repositories
Quantum and the cloud: Science fiction turned security strategy
Crystal Morin · 2025-11-25 · via Sysdig Blog

Someone walks into a room and says, ‘quantum computing’ and everyone else says, ‘huh?’ It’s simply a difficult concept to understand; however, the internet, containers, and cloud computing were once difficult to comprehend too. Quantum computing is a different way to process information…but it works exponentially faster than “normal” or classical computers.

Rather than classical bits, which are 0s and 1s used independently, it uses qubits, which are 0s, 1s, or both used simultaneously! It’s like a light switch versus a dimmer switch.

Quantum security concerns

It’s widely believed that in the near future, when quantum computers become powerful enough and stable enough, some of the encryption methods used today to keep data secure at rest or in transit will be broken or solved by quantum computers in a matter of seconds. This includes the commonly used RSA and Elliptic Curve Cryptography (ECC). However, it’s believed that the also popular Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) method will be weakened, but not broken.

Think back just a few years ago to when AI tools became more broadly available via ChatGPT in 2022, when LLMs really went mainstream. In the past three years, the technology has been integrated into all of our regularly used mobile applications, web browsers, job functions, and its use is being taught in schools now. We anticipated attacks against AI infrastructure and attacks using AI, and in the last year, we’ve seen an increasing number of confirmed reports. The threat landscape will be the same for quantum threats and vulnerable quantum computers.

Quantum software and hardware are being developed quickly, but quantum security is still a work in progress. If Q-Day, the day quantum computers become powerful enough to break current encryption algorithms, comes sooner than anticipated and migrations aren’t complete, this will open up a new line of threat vectors for supply chain attacks that threat actors may very well already be prepared to take advantage of. With the current availability and access to Quantum-as-a-Service (QaaS) from cloud service providers, threat actors are potentially able to test attacks or experiment with breaking traditional encryption methods.

The security community has coined a theory called ‘harvest now, decrypt later’. The idea is that threat actors will steal and hold on to any encrypted data until they are able to decrypt it with access to a quantum computer. This time/access will likely come much sooner for APTs than it will for other cybercriminal groups or script kiddies. While we may not read headlines about threat actors targeting encrypted data, we can consider this a current threat and make it a priority to safeguard our sensitive data from threat actors or consider replacing these encryption methods. Your encrypted data may have already been stolen, someone is just waiting to break it.

Proactive security/Post-quantum resiliency

So what do you do to anticipate security threats that aren’t fully understood? You’ve probably run this playbook several times before for different kinds of threats. First, take inventory of all organizational assets currently using vulnerable encryption methods and keep the inventory up-to-date as assets change. Unfortunately, data classification is a legacy issue that has carried over into complex, scaled cloud environments and it’s still proving to be a challenge. Which is why we now have data security posture management (DSPM) solutions on the market. Data classification and inventory is imperative for a successful, secure encryption migration prior to Q-Day.

Once you’ve completed a full inventory, make a plan to safely migrate those assets from vulnerable encryption algorithms to post-quantum standardized algorithms such as those suggested by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). NIST is world-renowned for cybersecurity standards and is leading the efforts to establish standards and guidance for post-quantum cryptography solutions. As of March 2025, NIST has identified 5 algorithms for standardization:

  • FIPS 203, 204, and 205
  • ML-KEM
  • HQC

There are also risk analysis tools available that help identify sensitive data that may need quantum-resistant encryption to be applied to it as a proactive security measure. This is especially important for healthcare, finance, and government sectors as they often store data that goes unchanged for long periods of time, such as names, dates of birth, social security numbers, or other government-issued ID numbers, and more.

Security leaders should be having conversations about quantum readiness now. What does your agility ability look like to move your encryption, or have you done so already? There is risk associated with not being ready for Q-Day, especially if you work in those sectors handling sensitive information.

Also often at the top of many security leaders’ minds is compliance. As of yet, there are no binding global post-quantum regulations, but many post-quantum cryptography security strategies are being prepared all across a very similar timeline.

Furthermore, nearly every technologically advanced country already enforces dual-use risk controls and export regulations on quantum technologies. This is because it can be used for civilian applications like healthcare and science; and also military and intelligence purposes like code-breaking and chemical weapon design. For this reason, there are restrictions on certain technologies and information between some countries and research organizations. Some quantum computing information sharing even requires licensing.

The U.S. federal government has prioritized post-quantum cryptography for several years, making updates to strategy regularly. An executive order from June 2025 states that the Directors of NSA and OMB must have requirements for cryptographic transitions for government agencies ready by December 1, 2025 and also states that transitions must take place before January 2, 2030.

The UK National Cyber Security Centre released a migration timeline in March 2025, which highly encourages starting now to first complete a full cryptography-based inventory assessment, then define migration goals before 2028.

The European Commission also recently published a roadmap for EU Member States. Post-quantum encryption methods should be in place by 2030 and migration is expected to begin at the end of 2026.

The Japanese government announced in October 2024 that it would begin working with companies like Toshiba and NEC Corporation in 2025 to develop quantum encryption technology by 2030.

Quantum in the cloud

Cloud service providers like AWS, Google, and Microsoft are already taking steps to secure the post-quantum future by deploying standardized algorithms. They are active in cryptographic communities and each have their own ongoing migrations, in addition to tools and resources for their customers to use. IBM has also migrated to quantum-safe encryption and provides users with the ability to monitor cryptography use and find cryptographic vulnerabilities.

We already see how these four cloud service providers offering access to Quantum-as-a-service (QaaS) have accelerated research and development and enabled rapid innovation in the quantum software market without requiring access to the fragile hardware. This open access has also supported educating the workforce for the quantum era and encouraged post-quantum computing migration.

Since quantum computing accelerates the speed of information processing, it can drastically reduce resource consumption in some cases. Therefore, in the future hybrid quantum-classical workflow may become more commonplace. We will be able to offload resource-intensive workloads to a quantum processor via the cloud and return the completed results to a classical system for post-processing, integration, or further action. Quantum computers won’t replace classical systems, they will enhance them.

This means that quantum is also expected to supercharge cloud-hosted AI models. This will have the most significant impact on agentic AI, where self-learning algorithms will be able to learn much faster. Faster information processing means:

  • Speeding up model training programs.
  • Significantly improving model optimization.
  • Models can handle exponentially more complex data (and more of it).

Readiness starts today

Quantum computing isn’t a distant “someday” technology. Subject matter experts are heeding warnings and governments are suggesting deadlines. It’s on the horizon and it’s already beginning to reshape security. Just as we prepared for and are trying to stay ahead of the AI threat landscape, now is the time to act to avoid disruption and ensure resilience in the post-quantum era.

So what can you do today?

  • Have a subject matter expert or analyst brief your executives and security teams on what quantum computing means for your business and security strategy.
  • Conduct a full inventory of data assets and current encryption methods. Prioritize sensitive and long-lived data.
  • Make a migration plan that includes highlighting the systems that depend on vulnerable encryption algorithms and an appropriate timeline for migration to recommended standards.
  • Anticipate business impact by conducting a threat model to understand operational and compliance implications on your environments, supply chains, and customer trust.

Quantum threats may still feel abstract, but the risk associated with waiting to take action is real now. Organizations that are prepared will face Q-Day with confidence, instead of chaos when the time comes.