惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

IT之家
IT之家
Recent Announcements
Recent Announcements
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
The GitHub Blog
The GitHub Blog
MyScale Blog
MyScale Blog
爱范儿
爱范儿
GbyAI
GbyAI
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
美团技术团队
Y
Y Combinator Blog
博客园 - 叶小钗
Apple Machine Learning Research
Apple Machine Learning Research
Martin Fowler
Martin Fowler
freeCodeCamp Programming Tutorials: Python, JavaScript, Git & More
罗磊的独立博客
M
MIT News - Artificial intelligence
博客园 - Franky
V
Visual Studio Blog
I
InfoQ
V
V2EX
Hugging Face - Blog
Hugging Face - Blog
腾讯CDC
博客园 - 司徒正美
L
LangChain Blog

Sysdig Blog

Masterclass: AI is more than ChatGPT and LLMs CVE-2026-39987 update: How attackers weaponized marimo to deploy a blockchain botnet via HuggingFace Kubernetes 1.36 - New security features 5 steps to securing AI workloads Marimo OSS Python Notebook RCE: From Disclosure to Exploitation in Under 10 Hours Security briefing: March 2026 The Sysdig MCP server is now available in AWS Marketplace Risk isn’t reduced until you take action: How teams resolve issues in the cloud AI infrastructure security: Why it deserves its own category Three pillars for building effective runtime-powered cloud defense, the right way Closing the cloud security gap with runtime security Seeing risk isn’t stopping it: Why visibility alone isn’t enough TeamPCP expands: Supply chain compromise spreads from Trivy to Checkmarx GitHub Actions AI coding agents are running on your machines — Do you know what they're doing? Runtime security for AI coding agents: Protecting AI-assisted development How runtime insights power every cloud security use case CVE-2026-33017: How attackers compromised Langflow AI pipelines in 20 hours Inline Cloud Response: Accelerating AWS threat containment for SOC teams Runtime malware detection for AWS Fargate Detecting CVE-2026-3288 & CVE-2026-24512: Ingress-nginx configuration injection vulnerabilities for Kubernetes Malware detection with Sysdig Security briefing: February 2026 Leveling up Kubernetes Posture: From baselines to risk-aware admission Eliminating runtime blind spots: How CleanStart and Sysdig build continuous trust across the container lifecycle LLMjacking: From Emerging Threat to Black Market Reality Real risks live at runtime: Why CISOs must care about deep telemetry in 2026 Sysdig named a Leader in the Forrester Wave™: Cloud Native Application Protection Solutions, Q1 2026 How to run rootless containers AI-assisted cloud intrusion achieves admin access in 8 minutes Security briefing: January 2026
Detecting React2Shell: The maximum-severity RCE vulnerabi...
Sysdig Threat Research Team · 2025-12-05 · via Sysdig Blog

On December 3, 2025, the React Team disclosed CVE-2025-55182, a critical unauthenticated remote code execution (RCE) vulnerability in React Server Components (RSCs). Dubbed "React2Shell", this maximum-severity flaw (CVSS 10.0) allows for potentially malicious code execution with a single crafted HTTP request. Next.js, which can be impacted downstream by React2Shell, has assigned CVE-2025-66478 to track its exposure.

For threat actors, React2Shell enables arbitrary server-side code execution upon exploitation, opening the door to data theft, lateral movement, and/or malware deployment. At the time of this writing, a public proof-of-concept (PoC) exploit has been released. Researchers report roughly 100% exploitation success rates against default configurations, which positions React2Shell as highly likely to be mass-exploited.

Following a detailed analysis, the Sysdig Threat Research Team (TRT) has developed a Falco detection rule for React2Shell, now available directly within Sysdig Secure. The Sysdig TRT recommends that all organizations running React 19 with Server Components take immediate action. Below, we provide detailed steps for remediation, along with a technical analysis of the vulnerability and its exploitation implications.

For a quick breakdown, look at our React2Shell video.

Technical analysis of React2Shell

Vulnerability details

CVE-2025-55182 resides in the RSC "Flight" protocol, specifically in how a react-server handles HTTP requests for Server Function endpoints. This deserialization flaw allows attacker-controlled data to influence server-side execution when processing crafted payloads.

React Server Functions allow clients to invoke server functions, with React providing integration points for frameworks. The vulnerable code deserialises HTTP payloads unsafely, enabling unauthenticated RCE.

Affected packages (versions 19.0.0, 19.1.0, 19.1.1, 19.2.0):

  • react-server-dom-parcel
  • react-server-dom-turbopack
  • react-server-dom-webpack

Applications are vulnerable even without explicit Server Function endpoints. The flaw is exploitable wherever RSC is supported.

Frameworks affected by React2Shell

  • Next.js (15.0.4 through 16.0.6, plus canaries from 14.3.0-canary.77)
  • React Router (RSC mode)
  • Waku
  • Parcel RSC (@parcel/rsc)
  • Vite RSC (@vitejs/plugin-rsc)
  • RedwoodSDK (rwsdk)

A standard create-next-app production build is vulnerable without modifications. Default configurations are exploitable out of the box.

What attackers can do

Unauthenticated access, remote exploitability, and React's ubiquity create extreme risk, as the maximum-severity CVSS score suggests. After achieving code execution, attackers can:

  • Exfiltrate data by accessing secrets, credentials, and user information.
  • Establish persistence by deploying backdoors or web shells.
  • Move laterally by pivoting to internal systems.
  • Deploy ransomware by encrypting data for extortion.

Unauthenticated RCE in a massively deployed framework suggests significant potential for abuse. This type of exploit can be easily automated and sweep the internet for vulnerable servers.

Detection and mitigation

Runtime detection

The Sysdig TRT has reinforced the “Suspicious Command Executed by Web Server” rule. This detection catches most unexpected, arbitrary commands spawned by web servers, raising alerts for Remote Command Execution in such applications. The following Falco rule can be used to detect suspicious commands. (Please note that the “proc.aname” fields may need to be adjusted for your environment. Additional commands can also be added to the minimal_unix_commands macro.)

- list: minimal_unix_commands
  items: [ls, cp, mv, rm, mkdir, rmdir, find, touch, cat, less, head, tail, nano, vi, chmod … ]


- list: shell_binaries
 items: [ash, bash, csh, ksh, sh, tcsh, zsh, dash]
	
- macro: spawned_process
  condition: (evt.type in (execve, execveat) and evt.dir=< and evt.arg.res=0)


- rule: Detecting React2Shell Remote Code Execution
  desc: This rule detects exploitation attempts of the React2shell vulnerability. Leveraging it, attackers can execute arbitrary commands in React applications. 
  condition: >
    ( spawned_process and 
    proc.name in (minimal_unix_commands) and 
    proc.pname in (shell_binaries) and 
    ( proc.aname startswith 'next-server' or proc.aname startswith 'react-router' or proc.aname in (waku,vite))
    )
  output: Possible React2shell exploitation attempts detected with %proc.cmdline and parent name %proc.pname in %container.name under user %user.name (proc.name=%proc.name proc.exepath=%proc.exepath proc.pname=%proc.pname gparent=%proc.aname[2] ggparent=%proc.aname[3] gggparent=%proc.aname[4] user.name=%user.name image=%container.image.repository proc.cmdline=%proc.cmdline proc.pcmdline=%proc.pcmdline container.id=%container.id evt.type=%evt.type evt.res=%evt.res gcmdline=%proc.acmdline[2] ggcmdline=%proc.acmdline[3] proc.cwd=%proc.cwd proc.pid=%proc.pid proc.cwd=%proc.cwd proc.ppid=%proc.ppid proc.sid=%proc.sid user.uid=%user.uid user.loginuid=%user.loginuid user.loginname=%user.loginname group.gid=%group.gid group.name=%group.name container.name=%container.name)
  priority: WARNING
  tags: [host, container, network, MITRE, MITRE_TA0002_execution, MITRE_T1059_command_and_scripting_interpreter, MITRE_T1104_multi_stage_channels]

Sysdig Secure customers can find this rule in the Sysdig Runtime Notable Events policy. Other Sysdig rules have been seen triggering when this vulnerability is exploited, including Reverse Shell Detected and Reverse Shell Redirects STDIN/STDOUT Using UNIX Socket. Suspicious Command by Web Server offers more generic protection.

WAF protections

In response to CVE-2025-55182, cloud providers have deployed web application firewall (WAF) rules to block potential exploitation:

  • Cloudflare deployed rules detecting unsafe deserialization in POST requests.
  • Google Cloud Armor added a cve-canary rule.
  • Vercel deployed platform-level protections.
  • Firebase Hosting/App Hosting is enforcing exploitation-limiting rules.

WAF rules provide defense-in-depth, but can be bypassed. Therefore, vulnerable organizations must patch the underlying code in order to comprehensively secure their environments.

Vulnerability scanning

Many PoCs on GitHub misdiagnose the root cause or fail to confirm React2Shell’s exploitability. Some even appear to be AI-generated: plausible-looking but broken. The original researcher confirmed that public PoCs differ from the actual exploit.

One organization, Assetnote, released a scanner that differentiates vulnerable from patched hosts. Their writeup details the mechanism, which sends ["$1:a:a"] against an empty object and causes vulnerable servers to return 500 with E{"digest": ...}. Patched versions, on the other hand, prevent this crash.

Vulnerability management in Sysdig Secure currently identifies packages affected by React2Shell. Also, the Threat Intelligence Feed within Sysdig Secure also provides immediate visibility into affected packages based on your inventory.

Remediation

Patching is the only fix for affected versions of React.

Fixed versions include:

  • React Server Components: 19.0.1, 19.1.2, 19.2.1
  • Next.js: 15.0.5, 15.1.9, 15.2.6, 15.3.6, 15.4.8, 15.5.7, 16.0.7

Required actions:

  • Update RSC packages.
  • Update Next.js to the patched version for your minor release.
  • Downgrade Next.js canaries (14.3.0-canary.77+) to stable 14.x.
  • Update other frameworks to the latest versions.
  • Deploy runtime detections with Falco or Sysdig Secure.
  • Enable WAF protections as a temporary mitigation.

Conclusion

CVE-2025-55182 and CVE-2025-66478 expose RSC applications to unauthenticated RCE. Maximum severity, default-configuration exploitability, and widespread adoption create urgent risk.

All organizations running the affected versions of React should patch them immediately. Runtime threat detections should also be deployed to detect the active exploitation of React2Shell. WAF rules can be used as temporary mitigations, but updating systems to fixed versions eliminates the risk. Teams should deploy runtime detection for environments where immediate patching isn't possible.