惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

S
Securelist
C
CERT Recently Published Vulnerability Notes
Forbes - Security
Forbes - Security
Exploit-DB.com RSS Feed
Exploit-DB.com RSS Feed
L
LINUX DO - 最新话题
The Hacker News
The Hacker News
Google Online Security Blog
Google Online Security Blog
SecWiki News
SecWiki News
K
KPMG report finds enterprise disconnect between AI and its ROI | CIO
The Last Watchdog
The Last Watchdog
S
Schneier on Security
T
Troy Hunt's Blog
N
News | PayPal Newsroom
cs.CL updates on arXiv.org
cs.CL updates on arXiv.org
Schneier on Security
Schneier on Security
P
Privacy & Cybersecurity Law Blog
T
Tor Project blog
T
Threatpost
Threat Intelligence Blog | Flashpoint
Threat Intelligence Blog | Flashpoint
A
Arctic Wolf
S
Secure Thoughts
P
Proofpoint News Feed
cs.CV updates on arXiv.org
cs.CV updates on arXiv.org
Security Latest
Security Latest
Scott Helme
Scott Helme
Security Archives - TechRepublic
Security Archives - TechRepublic
Latest news
Latest news
PCI Perspectives
PCI Perspectives
cs.AI updates on arXiv.org
cs.AI updates on arXiv.org
Hacker News - Newest:
Hacker News - Newest: "LLM"
L
LINUX DO - 热门话题
P
Palo Alto Networks Blog
www.infosecurity-magazine.com
www.infosecurity-magazine.com
G
GRAHAM CLULEY
V2EX - 技术
V2EX - 技术
Google DeepMind News
Google DeepMind News
Project Zero
Project Zero
V
Vulnerabilities – Threatpost
T
Threat Research - Cisco Blogs
Webroot Blog
Webroot Blog
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
N
News and Events Feed by Topic
TaoSecurity Blog
TaoSecurity Blog
大猫的无限游戏
大猫的无限游戏
T
Tenable Blog
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
V
Visual Studio Blog
H
Hacker News: Front Page
Simon Willison's Weblog
Simon Willison's Weblog
AWS News Blog
AWS News Blog

TetraLogical Blog

Designing for people with reading disabilities - TetraLogical Designing for people who are D/deaf - TetraLogical Designing accessible documents - TetraLogical Introduction to creating accessible documents - TetraLogical Inclusive user research: vulnerable people - TetraLogical Designing for people who are blind - TetraLogical Designing for people with low vision - TetraLogical Meet the team: Niamh Madden - TetraLogical Designing for people with anxiety - TetraLogical Designing for people with disabilities - TetraLogical Accessible building blocks for the web videos - TetraLogical Common accessibility misconceptions - TetraLogical Common misconceptions about testing accessibility - TetraLogical Common misconceptions about implementing accessibility - TetraLogical Common misconceptions about WCAG - TetraLogical Common misconceptions about disability - TetraLogical Meet the team: Grace Snow - TetraLogical Sustainable accessibility in complex organisations: strategic foundations - TetraLogical Sustainable accessibility in complex organisations: organisational realities - TetraLogical Sustainable accessibility in complex organisations: external factors - TetraLogical Common misconceptions about screen readers - TetraLogical Guide to the Inclusive Design Principles - TetraLogical Meet the team: Ian Lloyd - TetraLogical Annotating designs using common language - TetraLogical Meet the team: Catriona Morrison - TetraLogical Championing inclusive language - TetraLogical Press release: TetraLogical launches accessible self-led training courses to help digital teams build confidence in accessibility - TetraLogical Why inclusive products are green products - TetraLogical Accessible Recruitment - TetraLogical Accessibility and the agentic web - TetraLogical Meet the team: Craig Abbott - TetraLogical Foundations: types of assistive technology and adaptive strategies - TetraLogical European Accessibility Act (EAA) FAQ - TetraLogical Screen reader HTML support tables - TetraLogical Interview with Lola Odelola - TetraLogical Understanding EN 17161 Design for All - TetraLogical Inclusive user research: building rapport - TetraLogical Foundations: Keyboard accessibility - TetraLogical Can generative AI write contextual text descriptions? - TetraLogical Understanding the European Accessibility Act (EAA) - TetraLogical Meet Josh: a sportsman who has spinal muscular atrophy - TetraLogical Meet Jonathan: a photographer who has ADHD - TetraLogical Foundations: grouping forms with `<fieldset>` and `<legend>` - TetraLogical XR Accessibility: for people with moving disabilities - TetraLogical Meet Andre: a music producer and blind screen reader user - TetraLogical Foundations: types of disability - TetraLogical Meet Lauren: a film editor who has ADHD - TetraLogical Meet Steve: a photographer who is deaf and low vision - TetraLogical Foundations: form validation and error messages - TetraLogical Meet Hasmukh: a blind cricketer and screen reader user - TetraLogical XR Accessibility: for people with hearing disabilities - TetraLogical XR Accessibility: for people with thinking disabilities - TetraLogical XR Accessibility: for people with seeing disabilities - TetraLogical Introduction to XR Accessibility - TetraLogical Foundations: labelling text fields with input and label - TetraLogical Design patterns and WCAG - TetraLogical Why are my live regions not working? - TetraLogical Building a culture of accessibility - TetraLogical When to use tabindex= Accessibility foundations - TetraLogical Meet the team: Demelza Feltham - TetraLogical Can generative AI help write accessible code? - TetraLogical Meet the team: Steve Faulkner - TetraLogical Meet the team: Gez Lemon - TetraLogical Keyboard accessibility myths and WCAG - TetraLogical Amendment to the Public Sector Accessibility Regulations - TetraLogical What Considerations for TV user interface accessibility - TetraLogical Meet the team: Alistair Duggin - TetraLogical Sticky content: focus in view - TetraLogical The only accessibility specialist in the room - TetraLogical Meet the team: Ian Pouncey - TetraLogical Meet the team: Dean Holden - TetraLogical Meeting WCAG Level AAA - TetraLogical Foundations: accessible names and descriptions - TetraLogical Inclusive XR: accessible augmented reality experiences - TetraLogical Foundations: pointer gestures - TetraLogical Meet the team: Graeme Coleman - TetraLogical Adding sign language to videos - TetraLogical Foundations: introduction to WAI-ARIA - TetraLogical Meet the team: Joe Lamyman - TetraLogical Inclusive XR: accessible 3D experiences - TetraLogical Foundations: visible focus styles - TetraLogical Foundations: target sizes - TetraLogical Meet the team: Henny Swan - TetraLogical Meet the team: Ela Gorla - TetraLogical Foundations: native versus custom components - TetraLogical Foundations: HTML semantics - TetraLogical Accessibility and supporting Internet Explorer - TetraLogical Meet the team: Felicity Miners-Jones - TetraLogical Accessibility and QR codes - TetraLogical Inclusive user research: recruiting participants - TetraLogical Research insight: accessibility of images - TetraLogical Meet the team: Léonie Watson - TetraLogical Android accessibility: roles and TalkBack - TetraLogical Accessible design systems - TetraLogical Meet the team: Patrick H. Lauke - TetraLogical Inclusive user research: analysing findings - TetraLogical How to write user stories for accessibility - TetraLogical Triaging WCAG 2.1 Level AAA - TetraLogical
Does WCAG 2.2 apply to native apps - TetraLogical
2024-07-18 · via TetraLogical Blog
1.1.1 Non-text Content , Implementation solutions for 1.1.1 yes This applies directly as written, and as described in Intent from Understanding Success Criterion 1.1.1

Note 1

See also the Comments on Closed Functionality.

1.2.1 Audio-only and Video-only (Prerecorded), Implementation solutions for 1.2.1 yes This applies directly as written, and as described in Intent from Understanding Success Criterion 1.2.1.

Note 1

See also the Comments on Closed Functionality.

1.2.2 Captions (Prerecorded), Implementation solutions for 1.2.2 yes This applies directly as written, and as described in Intent from Understanding Success Criterion 1.2.2.

Note 1

The WCAG 2 definition of “captions” notes that "in some countries, captions are called subtitles...”
1.2.3 Audio Description or Media Alternative (Prerecorded), Implementation solutions for 1.2.3 yes This applies directly as written, and as described in Intent from Understanding Success Criterion 1.2.3.

Note 1:

The WCAG 2 definition of “audio description” says that "audio description" is "also called ‘video description’ and ‘descriptive narration’”.
Note 2:
Secondary or alternate audio tracks are commonly used for this purpose.
See also the Comments on Closed Functionality. 1.3.1 Info and Relationships, Implementation solutions for 1.3.1 yes This applies directly as written, and as described in Intent from Understanding Success Criterion 1.3.1.

Note 1:

In software, programmatic determinability is best achieved through the use of accessibility services provided by platform software to enable interoperability between software and assistive technologies and accessibility features of software.
See also the Comments on Closed Functionality. 1.3.2 Meaningful Sequence, Implementation solutions for 1.3.2 yes This applies directly as written, and as described in Intent from Understanding Success Criterion 1.3.2.

See also the Comments on Closed Functionality.

1.3.3 Sensory Characteristics, Implementation solutions for 1.3.3 yes This applies directly as written, and as described in Intent from Understanding Success Criterion 1.3.3. 1.4.1 Use of Color, Implementation solutions for 1.4.1 yes This applies directly as written, and as described in Intent from Understanding Success Criterion 1.4.1. 1.4.2 Audio Control, Implementation solutions for 1.4.2 yes
This applies directly as written, and as described in Intent from Understanding Success Criterion 1.4.2, replacing "on a Web page" with "in a non-web document or software”, "any content" with "any part of a non-web document or software”, "whole page" with "whole document or software”, and "on the Web page" with "in the document or software”; and removing "See Conformance Requirement 5: Non-Interference”
2.1.1 Keyboard, Implementation solutions for 2.1.1 yes This applies directly as written, and as described in Intent from Understanding Success Criterion 2.1.1.

Note 1:

Keyboard interface does not refer to a physical device but to the interface between the software and any keyboard or keyboard substitute (i.e., an interface where the software accepts text or other keystroke input)...
Note 2:
This success criterion does not imply that software always needs to directly support a keyboard or "keyboard interface”. Nor does it imply that software always needs to provide a virtual keyboard.
See also the Comments on Closed Functionality. 2.1.2 No Keyboard Trap, Implementation solutions for 2.1.2 yes
This applies directly as written, and as described in Intent from Understanding Success Criterion 2.1.2, replacing "page" with "non-web document or software" and "on the Web page" with "in the non-web document or software"; and removing "See Conformance Requirement 5: Non-Interference”.
See also Note 1, Note 2,  Note 3 and Comments on Closed Functionality. 2.1.4 Character Key Shortcuts, Implementation solutions for 2.1.4 yes This applies directly as written, and as described in Intent from Understanding Success Criterion 2.1.4

Note 1:

The WCAG2ICT interpretation is that a long press of a key (2 seconds or more) and other accessibility features provided by the platform do not meet the WCAG definition of a keyboard shortcut. See the keyboard shortcut definition for more details.
See also the Comments on Closed Functionality. 2.2.1 Timing Adjustable, Implementation solutions for 2.2.1 yes
This applies directly as written, and as described in Intent from Understanding Success Criterion 2.2.1, replacing "the content" with "non-web documents or software”.
2.2.2 Pause, Stop, Hide, Implementation solutions for 2.2.2 yes
This applies directly as written, and as described in Intent from Understanding Success Criterion 2.2.2, replacing "page" and "Web page" with "non-web documents and software" and removing "See Conformance Requirement 5: Non-Interference" in Note 2 of the success criterion.
See also Note 1, Note 2,  Note 3, Note 4 and Note 5 2.3.1 Three Flashes or Below Threshold, Implementation solutions for 2.3.1 yes
This applies directly as written, and as described in Intent from Understanding Success Criterion 2.3.1, replacing "Web pages" with "non-web documents or software", "the whole page" with "the whole non-web document or software”, and "the Web page" with "the non-web document or software”; and removing "See Conformance Requirement 5: Non-Interference”.
See also the Note 2.4.1 Bypass Blocks, Implementation solutions for 2.4.1 not within an app This does not apply within an app, but may apply across a set of related apps.

See also Note 1, Note 2,  Note 3, Note 4 and Note 5

2.4.2 Page Titled, Implementation solutions for 2.4.2 not within an app Appears to apply to whole applications rather than individual screens. Although the, implementation advice available appears to provide individual screen level methods.

Also see Issue #437 and Mobile Content Accessibility Guidelines (MCAG) 3.1.1. Screen Titled

2.4.3 Focus Order, Implementation solutions for 2.4.3 yes
This applies directly as written, and as described in Intent from Understanding Success Criterion 2.4.3 replacing "a Web page" with "non-web documents or software”.
2.4.4 Link Purpose (In Context), Implementation solutions for 2.4.4 yes
This applies directly as written and as described in Intent from Understanding Success Criterion 2.4.4.
Note:
In software, a "link" is any text string or image in the user interface outside a user interface control that behaves like a hypertext link. This does not include general user interface controls or buttons. (An OK button, for example, would not be a link.)
2.5.1 Pointer Gestures, Implementation solutions for 2.5.1 yes This applies directly as written, and as described in Intent from Understanding Success Criterion 2.5.1

See also Note 1, Note 2, Note 3 and Note 4

2.5.2 Pointer Cancellation, Implementation solutions for 2.5.2 yes
This applies directly as written, and as described in Intent from Understanding Success Criterion 2.5.2, making changes to the notes for non-web documents by replacing "web content" with "content", for non-web software applications by replacing "web content that interprets" with "user agents and other software applications that interpret" and "user agent" with "underlying platform software", and for non-web platform software by replacing "web content" with "platform software".
See also Note 1, Note 2,  Note 3, Note 4, Note 5, Note 6 and Comments on Closed Functionality. 2.5.3 Label in Name, Implementation solutions for 2.5.3 yes This applies directly as written, and as described in Intent from Understanding Success Criterion 2.5.3. 2.5.4 Motion Actuation, Implementation solutions for 2.5.4 yes This applies directly as written, and as described in Intent from Understanding Success Criterion 2.5.4.

See also the Comments on Closed Functionality.

3.1.1 Language of Page, Implementation solutions for 3.1.1 yes Applies to application as a whole rather than individual screens

This applies directly as written, and as described in Intent from Understanding Success Criterion 3.1.1 replacing "each web page" with "non-web documents or software”.

Note 1:

Where software platforms provide a "locale / language" setting, applications that use that setting and render their interface in that "locale / language" would comply with this success criterion. Applications that do not use the platform "locale / language" setting but instead use an accessibility-supported method for exposing the human language of the software would also comply with this success criterion. Applications implemented in technologies where assistive technologies cannot determine the human language and that do not support the platform "locale / language" setting may not be able to meet this success criterion in that locale / language.
See also the Comments on Closed Functionality. 3.2.1 On Focus, Implementation solutions for 3.2.1 yes This applies directly as written, and as described in Intent from Understanding Success Criterion 3.2.1

See also, the Note

3.2.2 On Input, Implementation solutions for 3.2.2 yes This applies directly as written, and as described in Intent from Understanding Success Criterion 3.2.2 3.2.6 Consistent Help, Implementation solutions for 3.2.6 yes
This applies directly as written and as described in Intent from Understanding Success Criterion 3.2.6, replacing "Web page(s)" and "page(s)" with "non-web document(s) or software program(s)", "set of Web pages" with "set of non-web documents or set of software programs", "page content" with "content", "on the page" with "in the non-web document or software", "page is serialized" with "non-web document or software content is serialized", "different page" with "different non-web document, software, or Web page", and "page variation" with "content layout variation".
See also Note 1, Note 2 and Note 3 3.3.1 Error Identification, Implementation solutions for 3.3.1 yes This applies directly as written, and as described in Intent from Understanding Success Criterion 3.3.1

See also the Comments on Closed Functionality.

3.3.2 Labels or Instructions, Implementation solutions for 3.3.2 yes This applies directly as written, and as described in Intent from Understanding Success Criterion 3.3.2. 3.3.7 Redundant Entry, Implementation solutions for 3.3.7 yes This applies directly as written, and as described in Intent from Understanding Success Criterion 3.3.7. 4.1.1 Parsing not applicable  

2023 errata update indicates this criterion is always supported. See the WCAG 2.0 Editorial Errata and the WCAG 2.1 Editorial Errata

4.1.2 Name, Role, Value, Implementation solutions for 4.1.2 yes
This applies directly as written, and as described in Intent from Understanding Success Criterion 4.1.2, replacing the note with: "This success criterion is primarily for software developers who develop or use custom user interface components. For example, standard user interface components on most accessibility-supported platforms already meet this success criterion when used according to specification.”.
See also Note 1, Note 2 and Note 3

See also the Comments on Closed Functionality.