惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

P
Proofpoint News Feed
T
The Blog of Author Tim Ferriss
aimingoo的专栏
aimingoo的专栏
M
MIT News - Artificial intelligence
N
Netflix TechBlog - Medium
Y
Y Combinator Blog
B
Blog RSS Feed
H
Help Net Security
Blog — PlanetScale
Blog — PlanetScale
Vercel News
Vercel News
Google DeepMind News
Google DeepMind News
Microsoft Security Blog
Microsoft Security Blog
G
Google Developers Blog
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
博客园 - 司徒正美
L
LangChain Blog
IT之家
IT之家
F
Fortinet All Blogs
V
V2EX
C
Check Point Blog
The Cloudflare Blog
博客园_首页
阮一峰的网络日志
阮一峰的网络日志
A
About on SuperTechFans

Stories Archive - 9to5Mac

How I built my desk setup entirely around using iPad as a computer Apple October Event: Here’s everything Apple might announce GaN chargers are a game-changer: UGreen 200W and OneWorld65 show why Inside Apple Car: Jony Ive’s design, Federighi’s skepticism, more Higher quality Bluetooth in AirPods Max beta hints at new AirPods Pro Ohio working on bill prohibiting the tracking of people with AirTags UK antitrust body able to fine Apple/Google 5% global turnover per day Here’s everything still to come from Apple in 2022 TSMC rumored to make Intel Meteor Lake chips to rival Apple’s M series New details on Jony Ive’s final years at Apple Apple begins requiring in-person work starting today with hybrid plan Five iPhone features that are now forgotten – by Apple and users both Schlage Encode Plus Review:The 1st lock with Apple home key support Six years later, first-gen iPhone SE runs the latest iOS & it’s great iPhone SE 3: Here’s what Apple didn’t tell you during the keynote Everything Apple could announce at its March 8 Peek Performance event No hope for Instagram for iPad Safari losing its place as the world’s second most-used web browser T2 Mac security vulnerability means passwords can now be cracked Apple tackling AirTag stalking concerns with Find My network changes Folding iPhone concept imagines Apple Watch-like secondary display Tap to Pay on iPhone feature to accept contactless payments unveiled Universal Control beta deep dive–tips and tricks, best practices, more Apple charging 27% for apps using alt payment systems in Netherlands Apple urges lawmakers against bill to allow iOS apps without App Store Popular movie releases on Apple TV+ not enough to keep new subscribers Apple supply constraints continue ahead of Q1 2022 earnings report Apple once considered a battery-powered HomePod Apple VR/AR headset overheating, June debut could be nixed for 2023 Hands-on: Keychron Q2 – my favorite new compact mechanical keyboard
Another class action lawsuit over the risk of iTunes purc...
Michael Bower · 2021-10-21 · via Stories Archive - 9to5Mac

Another class action lawsuit over the risk of iTunes purchased content removal

Apple is already facing a class-action lawsuit over the potential for iTunes purchased content removal, and it’s now faced with another on the opposite side of the country.

Both lawsuits make the same complaint: that the iTunes store wording says that you can “buy” or “rent” movies, while the reality is that you can only license them – and that license can be later withdrawn.

As reported by the Hollywood Reporter, David Andino, the lead plaintiff in this case, argues the “distinction is deceptive” and alleges that “Apple reserves the right to terminate access to what consumers have ‘purchased.’”

The complaint further notes that “when a licensing agreement terminates for whatever reason, Apple is required to pull the Digital Content from the consumers’ Purchased Folder and it does so without prior warning to the consumer […]

Except for content Defendant owns outright, the Digital Content purported to be sold on iTunes is licensed to Apple by the Digital Content’s owner. These licensing arrangements mean that, unlike in a true sale, Defendant can never pass title to the purchasing consumer. Accordingly, when a licensing agreement terminates for whatever reason, Defendant is required to pull the Digital Content from the consumers’ Purchased Folder and it does so without prior warning to the consumer.

This particular case doesn’t appear to be alleging any actual loss of content, only arguing that Apple is engaging in a deceptive practice by claiming that it “sells” content to customers.