

























A critical vulnerability chain in Microsoft 365 Copilot Enterprise that let attackers steal sensitive corporate data, MFA codes, email contents, calendar details, and confidential files with nothing more than a single click on a link pointing to a legitimate Microsoft domain.
Dubbed SearchLeak, uncovered by Varonis Threat Labs and tracked as CVE-2026-42824, the flaw earned Microsoft’s maximum severity rating before being patched. Its significance lies less in any single bug than in how it fuses a new AI-specific weakness with two well-worn web security flaws, turning Copilot Enterprise Search into a silent exfiltration channel.
SearchLeak is not a single flaw; it is a chained exploit that weaponizes Microsoft 365 Copilot Enterprise Search as a silent data exfiltration engine.
Detailed by Varonis researcher Dolev Taler, the attack combines three distinct weaknesses: a Parameter-to-Prompt (P2P) Injection, an HTML rendering race condition, and a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via Bing’s image search endpoint.
Individually, each vulnerability is manageable. Chained together, they create a one-click attack capable of stealing virtually any data the victim can access within their Microsoft 365 tenant without requiring any special privileges, plugins, or secondary interactions.
Stage 1 — P2P Injection: Microsoft 365 Copilot Search accepts a q URL parameter intended for natural language search queries. The flaw is that whatever value is placed in the q parameter is interpreted by Copilot’s AI engine not just as a search string, but as executable instructions.
An attacker crafts a malicious URL that points to a trusted microsoft.com domain and commands Copilot to search the victim’s mailbox and embed the extracted data in an image URL. Because the link resolves to a legitimate Microsoft domain, traditional anti-phishing and URL protection tools do not flag it.
Stage 2 — Racing the Guardrail: Microsoft’s mitigation for dangerous AI-generated HTML is to wrap Copilot output in <code> blocks, preventing the browser from rendering it as markup.
However, this wrapping only occurs after Copilot finishes its generation phase. During the streaming phase, raw HTML including attacker-injected <img> tags is temporarily rendered live in the DOM. The browser fires off the HTTP request before the sanitizer even activates, making this a textbook race condition bypass.
Stage 3 — SSRF via Bing: The victim’s browser cannot directly contact an attacker-controlled server due to the Content Security Policy (CSP) on m365.cloud.microsoft. However, *.bing.com is CSP-allowlisted. Bing’s “Search by Image” feature accepts a imgurl parameter and performs a server-side fetch of the provided URL to analyze it.
The attacker embeds the stolen data directly in the path of this Bing image-search URL. Bing’s backend unwittingly relays the stolen data to the attacker’s server, bypassing the CSP entirely.

The complete attack requires only a crafted link sent via email, Teams, Slack, or any messaging channel. When clicked, Copilot silently searches the victim’s mailbox, generates a response with embedded stolen data in a Bing image URL, and the attacker’s server logs the exfiltrated information all in seconds, with no second click.
Microsoft has fully patched the SearchLeak server-side; no user action is required to receive the fix. However, Varonis recommends security teams:
q parameter containing HTML or image-embedding instructionsSearchLeak follows Varonis’ earlier discovery of Reprompt, a similar one-click data exfiltration chain affecting Copilot Personal.
Together, these findings underscore how AI assistants are creating new, hard-to-detect attack surfaces by reactivating previously unexploitable classic vulnerabilities in new contexts.
Follow us on Google News, LinkedIn, and X to Get More Instant Updates.
Guru Baranhttps://cybersecuritynews.com
Gurubaran KS is a cybersecurity analyst, and Journalist with a strong focus on emerging threats and digital defense strategies. He is the Co-Founder and Editor-in-Chief of Cyber Security News, where he leads editorial coverage on global cybersecurity developments.
此内容由惯性聚合(RSS阅读器)自动聚合整理,仅供阅读参考。 原文来自 — 版权归原作者所有。