A sufficiently comprehensive spec is not (necessarily) code - 惯性聚合

推荐订阅源

Blog — PlanetScale

Java Code Geeks

Engineering at Meta

WordPress大学

Stack Overflow Blog

博客园 - Franky

Microsoft Security Blog

罗磊的独立博客

宝玉的分享

Check Point Blog

奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报

Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC

阮一峰的网络日志

酷壳 – CoolShell

Computer Things

The LLMs yearn for the spines New Post: A Crash Course in Predicate Logic Vim wants you to control, VSCode wants you to consume Logic for Programmers is Done I'm still alive Logic for Programmers v0.15, Livecoding Nontrailing separators do not spark joy Logic for Programmers extra credits Knowing about things is cheaper than knowing things Assumptions weaken properties Points are a weird and inconsistent unit of measure New Logic for Programmers (and the future of this newsletter) Illegal vs Unwanted States People get confused when language implementations break language guarantees April Cools Post: New York vs Chicago Pizza Choose Boring Technology and Innovative Practices LLMs are bad at vibing specifications Free Books New Blog Post: Some Silly Z3 Scripts I Wrote Stream of Consciousness Driven Development Proving What's Possible Logic for Programmers New Release and Next Steps Refinement without Specification My Gripes with Prolog The Liskov Substitution Principle does more than you think Some Fun Software Facts One more week to the Logic for Programmers Food Drive Get Logic for Programmers 50% off & Support Chicago Foodbanks I'm taking a break Modal editing is a weird historical contingency we have through sheer happenstance

A sufficiently comprehensive spec is not (necessarily) code

Hillel Wayne · 2026-04-16 · via Computer Things

此内容由惯性聚合(RSS阅读器)自动聚合整理，仅供阅读参考。原文来自 — 版权归原作者所有。