惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

博客园_首页
H
Help Net Security
腾讯CDC
宝玉的分享
宝玉的分享
H
Hackread – Cybersecurity News, Data Breaches, AI and More
L
LangChain Blog
爱范儿
爱范儿
T
The Blog of Author Tim Ferriss
J
Java Code Geeks
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
MyScale Blog
MyScale Blog
Engineering at Meta
Engineering at Meta
N
Netflix TechBlog - Medium
D
Docker
V
V2EX
Last Week in AI
Last Week in AI
G
Google Developers Blog
IT之家
IT之家
C
Check Point Blog
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
人人都是产品经理
人人都是产品经理
博客园 - 叶小钗
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
博客园 - 聂微东

Swift for Visual Studio Code comes to Open VSX Registry | InfoWorld

Notion courts developers with a platform for AI agents and workflow automation Using continuous purple teaming to protect fast-paced enterprise environments A better way to work with SQL Server Evidence-driven workflows: Rethinking enterprise process design AWS debuts Graviton-powered Redshift RG instances to cut analytics costs SAP’s AI promises last year? Most are still rolling out First look: Lemonade serves up local AI with limitations GitLab CEO sees developer tool bill increasing 100-fold Red Hat adds support for agentic AI development What’s new and exciting in JDK 26 Kill the loading spinner with local-first data and reactive SQL A networking revolution at AWS Tokenmaxxing is super dumb How to add AI to an existing product (without annoying users) Your AI doesn’t need another database What happens when engineering teams reorganize around AI agents Python isn’t always easy When cloud giants meddle in markets 12 model-level deep cuts to slash AI training costs The best new features in Python 3.15 Teradata launches platform for enterprise AI agents moving beyond pilots Three skills that matter when AI handles the coding MongoDB targets AI’s retrieval problem Building AI apps and agents with Microsoft Foundry Designing front-end systems for cloud failure Diskless databases: What happens when storage isn’t the bottleneck Vibe coding or spec-driven development? The agentic AI distraction Vibe coding or spec-driven development? How to choose Cloud providers are blinded by agentic AI
No, AI won’t destroy software development jobs
2026-05-06 · via Swift for Visual Studio Code comes to Open VSX Registry | InfoWorld

I’m not even remotely worried about AI eliminating software development jobs. In fact, I’m pretty sure there will soon be a boom in both software development jobs and the amount of software available to everyone. 

People have always worried about automation causing massive unemployment. Each time a breakthrough happens, folks are sure that “it will be different this time.” Only it never is different. 

But the worriers persist. 

It’s paradoxical

You can tell them all about the Jevons paradox — the observation that as something becomes more efficient, demand for that more efficient thing increases rather than decreases. In the mid-19th century, William Jevons noticed that the use of coal became more efficient. Humans figured out how to get more heat and energy out of less and less coal. The common belief was that, because less coal was needed for the same amount of energy or heat, there would be less demand for coal as a result. Everyone was concerned that coal miners would lose their jobs. But Jevons noticed that demand for coal actually went up, as the more efficient processes led to more widespread uses for coal.

The same thing happened half a century earlier with the introduction of the automated loom. Despite fears that the power loom would destroy jobs for weavers, it made the production of clothing and other textile products cheaper, increasing demand for such products and increased employment in the textile industry.

This phenomenon can be seen over and over again. Spinning jennies, automobiles, computers, robotic manufacturing, tractors, sewing machines, and countless other inventions all caused widespread fears of job loss, but the fears were never really realized. When a company can suddenly produce 10 times more with the people they have, they have always wanted to produce 10 times more, not cut their workforce by 90%. Yet here we are, with everyone sure that AI is going to put us all out of work. 

It’s not going to happen — especially in the software development realm. You know what is going to happen? The same thing that always happens. That which is automated and made more efficient will find new and different ways to express itself. Existing software will suddenly be vastly more useful as the backlog of features can be implemented. New software ideas that were previously too complex for humans to write and manage will be created. 

Marc Andreessen was never so right as when he said that “software is eating the world.” Sure, software was eating a lot when humans wrote every line of code. But now that code can be written 10 or 100 times faster, software’s appetite will go from hungry to ravenous. The work that can be done has expanded rapidly. And that work will be done because there is too much money in building what we have always wanted but that humans alone could not deliver.

A positive-sum game

The world is never a zero-sum game, but humans seem hard-wired to view the world that way. Only now, with AI, we have what Daniel Jefferies delightfully calls “Fear Mongering as a Service,” running rife through our industry. Yet while all the Chicken Littles decry the job market falling out of the sky, job postings continue to actually increase, and it is becoming harder to fill those jobs. 

Now that doesn’t mean the market isn’t shifting. The demand is strong for experienced engineers and weaker for entry-level jobs, a situation that is creating a bit of a paradox all by itself. The skills that worked for many years may not be as valuable going forward. Writing good code and getting an AI agent to write good code are two different but related skills.

Now, I recognize that the debate on this matter is strong and that there are many folks who will take the opposing side. Some will argue that software development shops overhired during Covid and that the resulting adjustments are going to put a damper on things. Some argue that the increase in job postings is merely a scam, with AI generating many of the new postings, and that the increase in job openings is a fraud. Could be. But it doesn’t matter.

So go ahead and panic if you want — update your résumé, run around flapping your arms, and cry that the sky is falling. Me? I’ve seen the PC “destroy” mainframe jobs, the internet “destroy” off-the-shelf software, open source “destroy” commercial software, and offshoring “destroy” the American programming market. Things are going pretty well considering all this “destruction.” I can’t wait for AI to “destroy” our current developer market.