Distributed computing systems implement redundancy to reduce the job completion time and variability. Despite a large body of work about computing redundancy, the analytical performance evaluation of redundancy techniques in queuing systems is still an open problem. In this work, we take one step forward to analyze the performance of scheduling policies in systems with redundancy. In particular, we study the pattern of shared servers among replicas of different jobs. To this end, we employ combinatorics and graph theory and define and derive performance indicators using the statistics of the overlaps. We consider two classical nonadaptive scheduling policies: random and round-robin. We then propose a scheduling policy based on combinatorial block designs. Compared with conventional scheduling, the proposed scheduling improves the performance indicators. We study the expansion property of the graphs associated with round-robin and block design-based policies. It turns out the superior performance of the block design-based policy results from better expansion properties of its associated graph. As indicated by the performance indicators, the simulation results show that the block design-based policy outperforms random and round-robin scheduling in different scenarios. Specifically, it reduces the average waiting time in the queue to up to 25% compared to the random policy and up to 100% compared to the round-robin policy.