惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

The GitHub Blog
The GitHub Blog
博客园 - 三生石上(FineUI控件)
V
V2EX
博客园 - 司徒正美
小众软件
小众软件
freeCodeCamp Programming Tutorials: Python, JavaScript, Git & More
T
Tailwind CSS Blog
Last Week in AI
Last Week in AI
雷峰网
雷峰网
月光博客
月光博客
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
Apple Machine Learning Research
Apple Machine Learning Research
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
S
SegmentFault 最新的问题
美团技术团队
Hugging Face - Blog
Hugging Face - Blog
WordPress大学
WordPress大学
宝玉的分享
宝玉的分享
爱范儿
爱范儿
博客园 - 聂微东
量子位
J
Java Code Geeks
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
Vercel News
Vercel News

cs.HC updates on arXiv.org

A Framework for Measuring Appropriate Reliance on Set-Valued AI Advice DeliChess: A Multi-party Dialogue Dataset for Deliberation in Chess Puzzle Solving From Explanation to Diagnosis: Next Generation Interactive Video Coach with Misstep Awareness SocialCoach: Personalized Social Skill Learning with RL-based Agentic Tutoring and Practice Formalizing all indexed mathematics as a benchmark for general reasoning, with the example of implementing dilatations of categories Face versus Body Tracking for Human-Robot Interaction: An Egocentric Dataset From Prompt to Service: An SLM-Based Agent Orchestration Gateway for AI-Driven Virtual Worlds What LLMs Must Forget to Teach Effectively: A DIY Approach to Premodern Japanese Language Pedagogy Quantitative Movement Testing: Measuring Patient Movements from a Single Smartphone Video Vision-Language Models Suppress Female Representations Under Ambiguous Input The New Social Image: How AI Competency and AI Proactivity Influence Self- and Peer-Perceptions in the Workplace TUX: Measuring Human--AI Tacit Understanding LLUMI: Improving LLM Writing Assistance for Mental Health Support with Online Community Feedback VideoFDB: Evaluating Full-Duplex Vision-Speech Capabilities in Conversational Agents Label Over Logic? How Source Cues Bias Human Fallacy Judgments More Than LLMs Inform, Coach, Relate, Listen: Auditing LLM Caregiving Support Roles How Coding Agents Fail Their Users: A Large-Scale Analysis of Developer-Agent Misalignment in 20,574 Real-World Sessions MetaRanker: Human-in-the-loop Active Ranking for Metalens Image Quality Analyzing Persona Effects in Generated Explanations from Multimodal LLM Agents in Urban Perception Granuscore: A Reference-Free Measure of Granularity for Text Analysis and Question Answering The Timing Dependencies of Trust: Speed, Accuracy, and cBCI Neuro-Decoupling in Human-AI Teams Bayesian Distributional Models of Executive Functioning Visual Matters: Connecting Aesthetic Appeal and Production Quality of Photos, Infographics and Data Visualizations to Credibility of Social Media Posts Data-driven Head Motion Generation through Natural Gaze-Head Coordination Agreement Metrics for LLM-as-Judge Evaluation: What to Report and Why Perceptually Lossless Tactile Texture Synthesis with Compact Spectral Envelope Models MambaGaze: Bidirectional Mamba with Explicit Missing Data Modeling for Cognitive Load Assessment from Eye-Gaze Tracking Data CogAdapt: Transferring Clinical ECG Foundation Models to Wearable Cognitive Load Assessment via Lead Adaptation Augmented Analytics and Decision Quality: The Role of Trust among Non-Technical BI Users Faster Completion, Less Learning: Generative AI Reduced Study Time on Math Problems and the Knowledge They Build
Trust Explanations to Do What They Say
Neil Natarajan, Reuben Binns, Jun Zhao, Nigel Shadbolt · 2023-02-14 · via cs.HC updates on arXiv.org

How much are we to trust a decision made by an AI algorithm? Trusting an algorithm without cause may lead to abuse, and mistrusting it may similarly lead to disuse. Trust in an AI is only desirable if it is warranted; thus, calibrating trust is critical to ensuring appropriate use. In the name of calibrating trust appropriately, AI developers should provide contracts specifying use cases in which an algorithm can and cannot be trusted. Automated explanation of AI outputs is often touted as a method by which trust can be built in the algorithm. However, automated explanations arise from algorithms themselves, so trust in these explanations is similarly only desirable if it is warranted. Developers of algorithms explaining AI outputs (xAI algorithms) should provide similar contracts, which should specify use cases in which an explanation can and cannot be trusted.