Academic publishing is facing a crisis driven by exponential growth in submissions and an overwhelmed peer review system, leading to inconsistent decisions and a severe reviewer shortage. This paper introduces Panvas, a platform that reimagines academic publishing as a continuous, community-driven process. Panvas addresses these systemic failures with a novel combination of economic incentives (paid reviews) and rich interaction mechanisms (multi-dimensional ratings, threaded discussions, and expert-led reviews). By moving beyond the traditional accept/reject paradigm and integrating paper hosting with code/data repositories and social networking, Panvas fosters a meritocratic environment for scholarly communication and presents a radical rethinking of how we evaluate and disseminate scientific knowledge. We present the system design, development roadmap, and a user study plan to evaluate its effectiveness.