惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

P
Proofpoint News Feed
U
Unit 42
V
Visual Studio Blog
D
DataBreaches.Net
F
Fortinet All Blogs
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
The GitHub Blog
The GitHub Blog
Y
Y Combinator Blog
月光博客
月光博客
大猫的无限游戏
大猫的无限游戏
T
The Blog of Author Tim Ferriss
GbyAI
GbyAI
博客园 - 叶小钗
Blog — PlanetScale
Blog — PlanetScale
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
MongoDB | Blog
MongoDB | Blog
The Cloudflare Blog
云风的 BLOG
云风的 BLOG
D
Docker
G
Google Developers Blog
罗磊的独立博客
博客园 - 三生石上(FineUI控件)
小众软件
小众软件
S
SegmentFault 最新的问题

cs.HC updates on arXiv.org

A Framework for Measuring Appropriate Reliance on Set-Valued AI Advice DeliChess: A Multi-party Dialogue Dataset for Deliberation in Chess Puzzle Solving From Explanation to Diagnosis: Next Generation Interactive Video Coach with Misstep Awareness SocialCoach: Personalized Social Skill Learning with RL-based Agentic Tutoring and Practice Formalizing all indexed mathematics as a benchmark for general reasoning, with the example of implementing dilatations of categories Face versus Body Tracking for Human-Robot Interaction: An Egocentric Dataset From Prompt to Service: An SLM-Based Agent Orchestration Gateway for AI-Driven Virtual Worlds What LLMs Must Forget to Teach Effectively: A DIY Approach to Premodern Japanese Language Pedagogy Quantitative Movement Testing: Measuring Patient Movements from a Single Smartphone Video Vision-Language Models Suppress Female Representations Under Ambiguous Input The New Social Image: How AI Competency and AI Proactivity Influence Self- and Peer-Perceptions in the Workplace TUX: Measuring Human--AI Tacit Understanding LLUMI: Improving LLM Writing Assistance for Mental Health Support with Online Community Feedback VideoFDB: Evaluating Full-Duplex Vision-Speech Capabilities in Conversational Agents Label Over Logic? How Source Cues Bias Human Fallacy Judgments More Than LLMs Inform, Coach, Relate, Listen: Auditing LLM Caregiving Support Roles How Coding Agents Fail Their Users: A Large-Scale Analysis of Developer-Agent Misalignment in 20,574 Real-World Sessions MetaRanker: Human-in-the-loop Active Ranking for Metalens Image Quality Analyzing Persona Effects in Generated Explanations from Multimodal LLM Agents in Urban Perception Granuscore: A Reference-Free Measure of Granularity for Text Analysis and Question Answering The Timing Dependencies of Trust: Speed, Accuracy, and cBCI Neuro-Decoupling in Human-AI Teams Bayesian Distributional Models of Executive Functioning Visual Matters: Connecting Aesthetic Appeal and Production Quality of Photos, Infographics and Data Visualizations to Credibility of Social Media Posts Data-driven Head Motion Generation through Natural Gaze-Head Coordination Agreement Metrics for LLM-as-Judge Evaluation: What to Report and Why Perceptually Lossless Tactile Texture Synthesis with Compact Spectral Envelope Models MambaGaze: Bidirectional Mamba with Explicit Missing Data Modeling for Cognitive Load Assessment from Eye-Gaze Tracking Data CogAdapt: Transferring Clinical ECG Foundation Models to Wearable Cognitive Load Assessment via Lead Adaptation Augmented Analytics and Decision Quality: The Role of Trust among Non-Technical BI Users Faster Completion, Less Learning: Generative AI Reduced Study Time on Math Problems and the Knowledge They Build
TRIVEA: Transparent Ranking Interpretation using Visual E...
Jun Yuan, Kaustav Bhattacharjee, Akm Zahirul Islam, Aritra Dasgu · 2023-08-29 · via cs.HC updates on arXiv.org

Ranking schemes drive many real-world decisions, like, where to study, whom to hire, what to buy, etc. Many of these decisions often come with high consequences. For example, a university can be deemed less prestigious if not featured in a top-k list, and consumers might not even explore products that do not get recommended to buyers. At the heart of most of these decisions are opaque ranking schemes, which dictate the ordering of data entities, but their internal logic is inaccessible or proprietary. Drawing inferences about the ranking differences is like a guessing game to the stakeholders, like, the rankees (i.e., the entities who are ranked, like product companies) and the decision-makers (i.e., who use the rankings, like buyers). In this paper, we aim to enable transparency in ranking interpretation by using algorithmic rankers that learn from available data and by enabling human reasoning about the learned ranking differences using explainable AI (XAI) methods. To realize this aim, we leverage the exploration-explanation paradigm of human-data interaction to let human stakeholders explore subsets and groupings of complex multi-attribute ranking data using visual explanations of model fit and attribute influence on rankings. We realize this explanation paradigm for transparent ranking interpretation in TRIVEA, a visual analytic system that is fueled by: i) visualizations of model fit derived from algorithmic rankers that learn the associations between attributes and rankings from available data and ii) visual explanations derived from XAI methods that help abstract important patterns, like, the relative influence of attributes in different ranking ranges. Using TRIVEA, end users not trained in data science have the agency to transparently reason about the global and local behavior of the rankings without the need to open black-box ranking models and develop confidence in the resulting attribute-based inferences. We demonstrate the efficacy of TRIVEA using multiple usage scenarios and subjective feedback from researchers with diverse domain expertise. Keywords: Visual Analytics, Learning-to-Rank, Explainable ML, Ranking