Adequate fetal and neonatal development depend upon the presence of a normal acid-base environment during pregnancy and the smooth transition from intra-uterine to extra-uterine life. Current methods to assess fetal pH and acid-base status are invasive and carry significant maternal and fetal risks. Given these limitations, obstetrical care providers developed the electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) system, a non-invasive tool, which evaluates beat-to-beat fetal heart rate (FHR) patterns in order to predict fetal oxygenation status in real-time. Every year, about 85 percent of the approximately 4 million live births in the United States are evaluated using EFM. Unfortunately, though there is ample physiological evidence that FHR patterns are inextricably linked to fetal acid-base status, the use of EFM has not been shown to reliably predict neonatal pH, nor has it reduced the incidence of adverse perinatal outcomes, including long-term neurological morbidity and cerebral palsy (CP). The poor specificity associated with the current interpretation of the EFM therefore leads to a paradox we have henceforth defined as the Obstetrical Paradox. In this study, we develop and seek to determine whether a novel, non-invasive method known as the FETAL technique (Fourier Evaluation of Tracings and Acidosis in Labor), which applies the Fourier Transform to EFM tracings and determines the spectral frequency distributions of the FHR, improves the assessment of the fetal pH in real time. We hypothesize that the improvement in the sensitivity and specificity of the EFM with the use of the FETAL technique will lead to a significant reduction in the rate of neonatal hypoxic injury and in the rate of caesarean deliveries for suspected fetal distress. The implications of a successful application of the FETAL technique would have paradigm-shifting consequences in the provision of modern obstetrical care.