惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

Apple Machine Learning Research
Apple Machine Learning Research
爱范儿
爱范儿
博客园_首页
博客园 - 【当耐特】
V
Visual Studio Blog
博客园 - 叶小钗
月光博客
月光博客
美团技术团队
J
Java Code Geeks
小众软件
小众软件
Y
Y Combinator Blog
博客园 - Franky
Martin Fowler
Martin Fowler
博客园 - 聂微东
Microsoft Azure Blog
Microsoft Azure Blog
IT之家
IT之家
MyScale Blog
MyScale Blog
人人都是产品经理
人人都是产品经理
Microsoft Security Blog
Microsoft Security Blog
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
阮一峰的网络日志
阮一峰的网络日志
酷 壳 – CoolShell
酷 壳 – CoolShell
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
云风的 BLOG
云风的 BLOG

math.ST updates on arXiv.org

What is Learnable in Valiant's Theory of the Learnable? Learning Perturbations to Extrapolate Your LLM Byzantine-Robust Distributed Sparse Learning Revisited The Sample Complexity of Multiple Change Point Identification under Bandit Feedback A proximal gradient algorithm for composite log-concave sampling Model-based Bootstrap of Controlled Markov Chains Approximation of Maximally Monotone Operators : A Graph Convergence Perspective Posterior Contraction Rates for Sparse Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks in Anisotropic Besov Spaces MIST: Reliable Streaming Decision Trees for Online Class-Incremental Learning via McDiarmid Bound A Spectral Framework for Closed-Form Relative Density Estimation Fast Rates for Offline Contextual Bandits with Forward-KL Regularization under Single-Policy Concentrability Higher-Order Equilibrium Tracking for EM-Compressible Online Estimation Scaling Limits of Long-Context Transformers A Note on Non-Negative $L_1$-Approximating Polynomials Susceptibilities and Patterning: A Primer on Linear Response in Bayesian Learning Linear Response Estimators for Singular Statistical Models Statistical inference with belief functions: A survey Robust stochastic first order methods in heavy-tailed noise via medoid mini-batch gradient sampling Every Feedforward Neural Network Definable in an o-Minimal Structure Has Finite Sample Complexity Adaptive auditing of AI systems with anytime-valid guarantees Locally Near Optimal Piecewise Linear Regression in High Dimensions via Difference of Max-Affine Functions Risk-Controlled Post-Processing of Decision Policies Covariate Balancing and Riesz Regression Should Be Guided by the Neyman Orthogonal Score in Debiased Machine Learning A Unified Pair-GRPO Family: From Implicit to Explicit Preference Constraints for Stable and General RL Alignment Time-Inhomogeneous Preconditioned Langevin Dynamics A Fine-Grained Understanding of Uniform Convergence for Halfspaces CITE: Anytime-Valid Statistical Inference in LLM Self-Consistency Ratio-based Loss Functions Optimal Confidence Band for Kernel Gradient Flow Estimator A renormalization-group inspired lattice-based framework for piecewise generalized linear models
Statistical Analysis of Quantum Annealing
[Submitted on 18 Jan 2021 (v1), last revised 24 Aug 2026 (this v · 2021-01-18 · via math.ST updates on arXiv.org

This paper has been withdrawn by Xinyu Song

No PDF available, click to view other formats

Abstract:Quantum computers use quantum resources to carry out computational tasks and may outperform classical computers in solving certain computational problems. Special-purpose quantum computers such as quantum annealers employ quantum adiabatic theorem to solve combinatorial optimization problems. In this paper, we compare classical annealings such as simulated annealing and quantum annealings that are done by the D-Wave machines both theoretically and numerically. We show that if the classical and quantum annealing are characterized by equivalent Ising models, then solving an optimization problem, i.e., finding the minimal energy of each Ising model, by the two annealing procedures, are mathematically identical. For quantum annealing, we also derive the probability lower-bound on successfully solving an optimization problem by measuring the system at the end of the annealing procedure. Moreover, we present the Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) method to realize quantum annealing by classical computers and investigate its statistical properties. In the numerical section, we discuss the discrepancies between the MCMC based annealing approaches and the quantum annealing approach in solving optimization problems.

Submission history

From: Xinyu Song [view email]
[v1] Mon, 18 Jan 2021 02:57:36 UTC (780 KB)
[v2] Mon, 24 Aug 2026 06:38:40 UTC (1 KB) (withdrawn)