惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

Apple Machine Learning Research
Apple Machine Learning Research
博客园_首页
G
Google Developers Blog
aimingoo的专栏
aimingoo的专栏
罗磊的独立博客
博客园 - 【当耐特】
M
MIT News - Artificial intelligence
D
Docker
博客园 - 三生石上(FineUI控件)
博客园 - 司徒正美
人人都是产品经理
人人都是产品经理
博客园 - 叶小钗
月光博客
月光博客
S
SegmentFault 最新的问题
Jina AI
Jina AI
Blog — PlanetScale
Blog — PlanetScale
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
奇客Solidot–传递最新科技情报
博客园 - Franky
L
LangChain Blog
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
Microsoft Azure Blog
Microsoft Azure Blog
阮一峰的网络日志
阮一峰的网络日志
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
Last Week in AI
Last Week in AI

math.ST updates on arXiv.org

What is Learnable in Valiant's Theory of the Learnable? Learning Perturbations to Extrapolate Your LLM Byzantine-Robust Distributed Sparse Learning Revisited The Sample Complexity of Multiple Change Point Identification under Bandit Feedback A proximal gradient algorithm for composite log-concave sampling Model-based Bootstrap of Controlled Markov Chains Approximation of Maximally Monotone Operators : A Graph Convergence Perspective Posterior Contraction Rates for Sparse Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks in Anisotropic Besov Spaces MIST: Reliable Streaming Decision Trees for Online Class-Incremental Learning via McDiarmid Bound A Spectral Framework for Closed-Form Relative Density Estimation Fast Rates for Offline Contextual Bandits with Forward-KL Regularization under Single-Policy Concentrability Higher-Order Equilibrium Tracking for EM-Compressible Online Estimation Scaling Limits of Long-Context Transformers A Note on Non-Negative $L_1$-Approximating Polynomials Susceptibilities and Patterning: A Primer on Linear Response in Bayesian Learning Linear Response Estimators for Singular Statistical Models Statistical inference with belief functions: A survey Robust stochastic first order methods in heavy-tailed noise via medoid mini-batch gradient sampling Every Feedforward Neural Network Definable in an o-Minimal Structure Has Finite Sample Complexity Adaptive auditing of AI systems with anytime-valid guarantees Locally Near Optimal Piecewise Linear Regression in High Dimensions via Difference of Max-Affine Functions Risk-Controlled Post-Processing of Decision Policies Covariate Balancing and Riesz Regression Should Be Guided by the Neyman Orthogonal Score in Debiased Machine Learning A Unified Pair-GRPO Family: From Implicit to Explicit Preference Constraints for Stable and General RL Alignment Time-Inhomogeneous Preconditioned Langevin Dynamics A Fine-Grained Understanding of Uniform Convergence for Halfspaces CITE: Anytime-Valid Statistical Inference in LLM Self-Consistency Ratio-based Loss Functions Optimal Confidence Band for Kernel Gradient Flow Estimator A renormalization-group inspired lattice-based framework for piecewise generalized linear models
Two-Stage Testing in a high dimensional setting
Marianne A Jonker, Luc van Schijndel, Eric Cator · 2024-06-25 · via math.ST updates on arXiv.org

In a high dimensional regression setting in which the number of variables ($p$) is much larger than the sample size ($n$), the number of possible two-way interactions between the variables is immense. If the number of variables is in the order of one million, which is usually the case in e.g., genetics, the number of two-way interactions is of the order one million squared. In the pursuit of detecting two-way interactions, testing all pairs for interactions one-by-one is computational unfeasible and the multiple testing correction will be severe. In this paper we describe a two-stage testing procedure consisting of a screening and an evaluation stage. It is proven that, under some assumptions, the tests-statistics in the two stages are asymptotically independent. As a result, multiplicity correction in the second stage is only needed for the number of statistical tests that are actually performed in that stage. This increases the power of the testing procedure. Also, since the testing procedure in the first stage is computational simple, the computational burden is lowered. Simulations have been performed for multiple settings and regression models (generalized linear models and Cox PH model) to study the performance of the two-stage testing procedure. The results show type I error control and an increase in power compared to the procedure in which the pairs are tested one-by-one.