惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

aimingoo的专栏
aimingoo的专栏
Jina AI
Jina AI
WordPress大学
WordPress大学
Recent Announcements
Recent Announcements
G
Google Developers Blog
I
InfoQ
H
Hackread – Cybersecurity News, Data Breaches, AI and More
Google DeepMind News
Google DeepMind News
P
Proofpoint News Feed
MyScale Blog
MyScale Blog
M
MIT News - Artificial intelligence
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
C
Check Point Blog
J
Java Code Geeks
T
Tailwind CSS Blog
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
OSCHINA 社区最新新闻
Microsoft Security Blog
Microsoft Security Blog
MongoDB | Blog
MongoDB | Blog
V
Visual Studio Blog
人人都是产品经理
人人都是产品经理
量子位
A
About on SuperTechFans
D
DataBreaches.Net
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知

math.ST updates on arXiv.org

What is Learnable in Valiant's Theory of the Learnable? Learning Perturbations to Extrapolate Your LLM Byzantine-Robust Distributed Sparse Learning Revisited The Sample Complexity of Multiple Change Point Identification under Bandit Feedback A proximal gradient algorithm for composite log-concave sampling Model-based Bootstrap of Controlled Markov Chains Approximation of Maximally Monotone Operators : A Graph Convergence Perspective Posterior Contraction Rates for Sparse Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks in Anisotropic Besov Spaces MIST: Reliable Streaming Decision Trees for Online Class-Incremental Learning via McDiarmid Bound A Spectral Framework for Closed-Form Relative Density Estimation Fast Rates for Offline Contextual Bandits with Forward-KL Regularization under Single-Policy Concentrability Higher-Order Equilibrium Tracking for EM-Compressible Online Estimation Scaling Limits of Long-Context Transformers A Note on Non-Negative $L_1$-Approximating Polynomials Susceptibilities and Patterning: A Primer on Linear Response in Bayesian Learning Linear Response Estimators for Singular Statistical Models Statistical inference with belief functions: A survey Robust stochastic first order methods in heavy-tailed noise via medoid mini-batch gradient sampling Every Feedforward Neural Network Definable in an o-Minimal Structure Has Finite Sample Complexity Adaptive auditing of AI systems with anytime-valid guarantees Locally Near Optimal Piecewise Linear Regression in High Dimensions via Difference of Max-Affine Functions Risk-Controlled Post-Processing of Decision Policies Covariate Balancing and Riesz Regression Should Be Guided by the Neyman Orthogonal Score in Debiased Machine Learning A Unified Pair-GRPO Family: From Implicit to Explicit Preference Constraints for Stable and General RL Alignment Time-Inhomogeneous Preconditioned Langevin Dynamics A Fine-Grained Understanding of Uniform Convergence for Halfspaces CITE: Anytime-Valid Statistical Inference in LLM Self-Consistency Ratio-based Loss Functions Optimal Confidence Band for Kernel Gradient Flow Estimator A renormalization-group inspired lattice-based framework for piecewise generalized linear models
A Dynamic Likelihood Approach to Filtering for Advection-...
[Submitted on 10 Jun 2024 (v1), last revised 12 Jun 2024 (this v · 2024-06-11 · via math.ST updates on arXiv.org

View PDF

Abstract:A Bayesian data assimilation scheme is formulated for advection-dominated advective and diffusive evolutionary problems, based upon the Dynamic Likelihood (DLF) approach to filtering. The DLF was developed specifically for hyperbolic problems -waves-, and in this paper, it is extended via a split step formulation, to handle advection-diffusion problems. In the dynamic likelihood approach, observations and their statistics are used to propagate probabilities along characteristics, evolving the likelihood in time. The estimate posterior thus inherits phase information. For advection-diffusion the advective part of the time evolution is handled on the basis of observations alone, while the diffusive part is informed through the model as well as observations. We expect, and indeed show here, that in advection-dominated problems, the DLF approach produces better estimates than other assimilation approaches, particularly when the observations are sparse and have low uncertainty. The added computational expense of the method is cubic in the total number of observations over time, which is on the same order of magnitude as a standard Kalman filter and can be mitigated by bounding the number of forward propagated observations, discarding the least informative data.

Submission history

From: Johannes Krotz [view email]
[v1] Mon, 10 Jun 2024 22:56:56 UTC (4,121 KB)
[v2] Wed, 12 Jun 2024 03:01:45 UTC (4,121 KB)