In the negative perceptron problem we are given $n$ data points $({\boldsymbol x}_i,y_i)$, where ${\boldsymbol x}_i$ is a $d$-dimensional vector and $y_i\in\{+1,-1\}$ is a binary label. The data are not linearly separable and hence we content ourselves to find a linear classifier with the largest possible \emph{negative} margin. In other words, we want to find a unit norm vector ${\boldsymbol θ}$ that maximizes $\min_{i\le n}y_i\langle {\boldsymbol θ},{\boldsymbol x}_i\rangle$. This is a non-convex optimization problem (it is equivalent to finding a maximum norm vector in a polytope), and we study its typical properties under two random models for the data. We consider the proportional asymptotics in which $n,d\to \infty$ with $n/d\toδ$, and prove upper and lower bounds on the maximum margin $κ_{\text{s}}(δ)$ or -- equivalently -- on its inverse function $δ_{\text{s}}(κ)$. In other words, $δ_{\text{s}}(κ)$ is the overparametrization threshold: for $n/d\le δ_{\text{s}}(κ)-\varepsilon$ a classifier achieving vanishing training error exists with high probability, while for $n/d\ge δ_{\text{s}}(κ)+\varepsilon$ it does not. Our bounds on $δ_{\text{s}}(κ)$ match to the leading order as $κ\to -\infty$. We then analyze a linear programming algorithm to find a solution, and characterize the corresponding threshold $δ_{\text{lin}}(κ)$. We observe a gap between the interpolation threshold $δ_{\text{s}}(κ)$ and the linear programming threshold $δ_{\text{lin}}(κ)$, raising the question of the behavior of other algorithms.