Consider a population whose size changes stepwise by its members reproducing or dying (disappearing), but is otherwise quite general. Denote the initial (non-random) size by $Z_0$ and the size of the $n$th change by $C_n$, $n= 1, 2, \ldots$. Population sizes hence develop successively as $Z_1=Z_0+C_1,\ Z_2=Z_1+C_2$ and so on, indefinitely or until there are no further size changes, due to extinction. Extinction is thus assumed final, so that $Z_n=0$ implies that $Z_{n+1}=0$, without there being any other finite absorbing class of population sizes. We make no assumptions about the time durations between the successive changes. In the real world, or more specific models, those may be of varying length, depending upon individual life span distributions and their interdependencies, the age-distribution at hand and intervening circumstances. Changes may have quite varying distributions. The basic assumption is that there is a {\em carrying capacity}, i.e. a non-negative number $K$ such that the conditional expectation of the change, given the complete past history, is non-positive whenever the population exceeds the carrying capacity. Further, to avoid unnecessary technicalities, we assume that the change $C_n$ equals -1 (one individual dying) with a conditional (given the past) probability uniformly bounded away from 0. It is a simple and not very restrictive way to avoid parity phenomena, it is related to irreducibility in Markov settings. The straightforward, but in contents and implications far-reaching, consequence is that all such populations must die out. Mathematically, it follows by a submartingale convergence property and positive probability of reaching the absorbing extinction state.