


























We review the well known Bertrand paradoxes, and we first maintain that they do not point to any probabilistic inconsistency, but rather to the risks incurred with a careless use of the locution "at random". We claim then that these paradoxes spring up also in the discussion of the celebrated Buffon's needle problem, and that they are essentially related to the definition of (geometrical) probabilities on "uncountably" infinite sets. A few empirical remarks are finally added to underline the difference between "passive" and "active" randomness, and the prospects of any experimental decision
此内容由惯性聚合(RSS阅读器)自动聚合整理,仅供阅读参考。 原文来自 — 版权归原作者所有。