Graph colorings have been of interest to mathematicians for a long time, but relatively recently, social scientists have also found them to be interesting tools for studying group behavior. In the last 20 years, scientists have begun to study how coloring problems can be solved by groups of individuals on a graph, which has led to new insights into network structure, group dynamics, and individual human behavior. Despite this newfound utility, the exact nature of these distributed coloring problems is not well-understood, and established mathematical tools like the chromatic polynomial miss the unique challenges that arise in these social problem-solving situations with limited information. In this paper, we provide a new framework for understanding these distributed problems by defining a new kind of graph coloring with particular relevance to consensus formation on networks, in which all vertices are trying to agree on a common color. These strict gridlock colorings represent roadblocks to consensus where the group will not reach a uniform coloring using natural update processes. We describe a recurrence relation that provides an algorithm for counting these gridlocked colorings, which establishes a mathematical measure of how much a given graph hinders consensus in a group.