A random algebraic graph is defined by a group $G$ with a uniform distribution over it and a connection $σ:G\longrightarrow[0,1]$ with expectation $p,$ satisfying $σ(g)=σ(g^{-1}).$ The random graph $\mathsf{RAG}(n,G,p,σ)$ with vertex set $[n]$ is formed as follows. First, $n$ independent vectors $x_1,\ldots,x_n$ are sampled uniformly from $G.$ Then, vertices $i,j$ are connected with probability $σ(x_ix_j^{-1}).$ This model captures random geometric graphs over the sphere and the hypercube, certain regimes of the stochastic block model, and random subgraphs of Cayley graphs. The main question of interest to the current paper is: when is a random algebraic graph statistically and/or computationally distinguishable from $\mathsf{G}(n,p)$? Our results fall into two categories. 1) Geometric. We focus on the case $G =\{\pm1\}^d$ and use Fourier-analytic tools. For hard threshold connections, we match [LMSY22b] for $p = ω(1/n)$ and for $1/(r\sqrt{d})$-Lipschitz connections we extend the results of [LR21b] when $d = Ω(n\log n)$ to the non-monotone setting. We study other connections such as indicators of interval unions and low-degree polynomials. 2) Algebraic. We provide evidence for an exponential statistical-computational gap. Consider any finite group $G$ and let $A\subseteq G$ be a set of elements formed by including each set of the form $\{g, g^{-1}\}$ independently with probability $1/2.$ Let $Γ_n(G,A)$ be the distribution of random graphs formed by taking a uniformly random induced subgraph of size $n$ of the Cayley graph $Γ(G,A).$ Then, $Γ_n(G,A)$ and $\mathsf{G}(n,1/2)$ are statistically indistinguishable with high probability over $A$ if and only if $\log|G|\gtrsim n.$ However, low-degree polynomial tests fail to distinguish $Γ_n(G,A)$ and $\mathsf{G}(n,1/2)$ with high probability over $A$ when $\log |G|=\log^{Ω(1)}n.$