This article compares different proving methods for projective incidence theorems. In particular, a technique using quadrilateral tilings recently introduced by Sergey Fomin and Pavlo Pylyavskyy is shown to be at most as strong as proofs using bi-quadratic final polynomials and thus, also proofs using Ceva-Menelaus-tilings. Furthermore, we demonstrate the equivalence between quadrilateral-tiling-proofs and proofs using exclusively Menelaus configurations. We exemplify the transition between the proofs in several examples in 2D and in 3D.