If the aphorism "All models are wrong"- George Box, continues to be true in data analysis, particularly when analyzing real-world data, then we should annotate this wisdom with visible and explainable data-driven patterns. Such annotations can critically shed invaluable light on validity as well as limitations of statistical modeling as a data analysis approach. In an effort to avoid holding our real data to potentially unattainable or even unrealistic theoretical structures, we propose to utilize the data analysis paradigm called Categorical Exploratory Data Analysis (CEDA). We illustrate the merits of this proposal with two real-world data sets from the perspective of goodness-of-fit. In both data sets, the Normal distribution's bell shape seemingly fits rather well by first glance. We apply CEDA to bring out where and how each data fits or deviates from the model shape via several important distributional aspects. We also demonstrate that CEDA affords a version of tree-based p-value, and compare it with p-values based on traditional statistical approaches. Along our data analysis, we invest computational efforts in making graphic display to illuminate the advantages of using CEDA as one primary way of data analysis in Data Science education.