惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

F
Fortinet All Blogs
博客园 - 三生石上(FineUI控件)
小众软件
小众软件
人人都是产品经理
人人都是产品经理
V
Visual Studio Blog
Last Week in AI
Last Week in AI
V
V2EX
博客园_首页
IT之家
IT之家
Jina AI
Jina AI
博客园 - 叶小钗
The Cloudflare Blog
T
Tailwind CSS Blog
腾讯CDC
B
Blog
D
Docker
L
LangChain Blog
博客园 - 司徒正美
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
让小产品的独立变现更简单 - ezindie.com
美团技术团队
Apple Machine Learning Research
Apple Machine Learning Research
爱范儿
爱范儿
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
Cyber Security Advisories - MS-ISAC
GbyAI
GbyAI

stat.ML updates on arXiv.org

Adaptive multi-fidelity optimization with fast learning rates Enhancing AI and Dynamical Subseasonal Forecasts with Probabilistic Bias Correction Sample Complexity Bounds for Stochastic Shortest Path with a Generative Model The Harder Path: Last Iterate Convergence for Uncoupled Learning in Zero-Sum Games with Bandit Feedback Stylistic-STORM (ST-STORM) : Perceiving the Semantic Nature of Appearance Collective Kernel EFT for Pre-activation ResNets PRIM-cipal components analysis One-Shot Generative Flows: Existence and Obstructions Structural interpretability in SVMs with truncated orthogonal polynomial kernels Amortized Optimal Transport from Sliced Potentials MinShap: A Modified Shapley Value Approach for Feature Selection Unsupervised feature selection using Bayesian Tucker decomposition Multi-User mmWave Beam and Rate Adaptation via Combinatorial Satisficing Bandits Best of both worlds: Stochastic & adversarial best-arm identification Scalable Model-Based Clustering with Sequential Monte Carlo Expert-Guided Class-Conditional Goodness-of-Fit Scores for Interpretable Classification with Informative Missingness: An Application to Seismic Monitoring Lightweight Geometric Adaptation for Training Physics-Informed Neural Networks Gating Enables Curvature: A Geometric Expressivity Gap in Attention Zeroth-Order Optimization at the Edge of Stability Differentially Private Conformal Prediction CLion: Efficient Cautious Lion Optimizer with Enhanced Generalization Generative Augmented Inference Improving Machine Learning Performance with Synthetic Augmentation PAC-MCTS: Bias-Aware Pruning for Robust LLM-Guided Search and Planning Path-Sampled Integrated Gradients Heat and Matérn Kernels on Matchings Doubly Outlier-Robust Online Infinite Hidden Markov Model Momentum Further Constrains Sharpness at the Edge of Stochastic Stability Multistage Conditional Compositional Optimization BOAT: Navigating the Sea of In Silico Predictors for Antibody Design via Multi-Objective Bayesian Optimization
Hierarchical Kernel Transformer: Multi-Scale Attention wi...
Giansalvo Cirrincione · 2026-04-10 · via stat.ML updates on arXiv.org

The Hierarchical Kernel Transformer (HKT) is a multi-scale attention mechanism that processes sequences at L resolution levels via trainable causal downsampling, combining level-specific score matrices through learned convex weights. The total computational cost is bounded by 4/3 times that of standard attention, reaching 1.3125x for L = 3. Four theoretical results are established. (i) The hierarchical score matrix defines a positive semidefinite kernel under a sufficient condition on the symmetrised bilinear form (Proposition 3.1). (ii) The asymmetric score matrix decomposes uniquely into a symmetric part controlling reciprocal attention and an antisymmetric part controlling directional attention; HKT provides L independent such pairs across scales, one per resolution level (Propositions 3.5-3.6). (iii) The approximation error decomposes into three interpretable components with an explicit non-Gaussian correction and a geometric decay bound in L (Theorem 4.3, Proposition 4.4). (iv) HKT strictly subsumes single-head standard attention and causal convolution (Proposition 3.4). Experiments over 3 random seeds show consistent gains over retrained standard attention baselines: +4.77pp on synthetic ListOps (55.10+-0.29% vs 50.33+-0.12%, T = 512), +1.44pp on sequential CIFAR-10 (35.45+-0.09% vs 34.01+-0.19%, T = 1,024), and +7.47pp on IMDB character-level sentiment (70.19+-0.57% vs 62.72+-0.40%, T = 1,024), all at 1.31x overhead.