惯性聚合 高效追踪和阅读你感兴趣的博客、新闻、科技资讯
阅读原文 在惯性聚合中打开

推荐订阅源

B
Blog
The Cloudflare Blog
J
Java Code Geeks
Apple Machine Learning Research
Apple Machine Learning Research
T
Tailwind CSS Blog
L
LangChain Blog
Recent Announcements
Recent Announcements
Hugging Face - Blog
Hugging Face - Blog
Microsoft Security Blog
Microsoft Security Blog
F
Fortinet All Blogs
Microsoft Azure Blog
Microsoft Azure Blog
V
V2EX
I
InfoQ
博客园 - 司徒正美
T
The Blog of Author Tim Ferriss
G
Google Developers Blog
云风的 BLOG
云风的 BLOG
aimingoo的专栏
aimingoo的专栏
小众软件
小众软件
H
Help Net Security
博客园 - 三生石上(FineUI控件)
S
SegmentFault 最新的问题
B
Blog RSS Feed
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知
钛媒体:引领未来商业与生活新知

stat.ML updates on arXiv.org

Adaptive multi-fidelity optimization with fast learning rates Enhancing AI and Dynamical Subseasonal Forecasts with Probabilistic Bias Correction Sample Complexity Bounds for Stochastic Shortest Path with a Generative Model The Harder Path: Last Iterate Convergence for Uncoupled Learning in Zero-Sum Games with Bandit Feedback Stylistic-STORM (ST-STORM) : Perceiving the Semantic Nature of Appearance Collective Kernel EFT for Pre-activation ResNets PRIM-cipal components analysis One-Shot Generative Flows: Existence and Obstructions Structural interpretability in SVMs with truncated orthogonal polynomial kernels Amortized Optimal Transport from Sliced Potentials MinShap: A Modified Shapley Value Approach for Feature Selection Unsupervised feature selection using Bayesian Tucker decomposition Multi-User mmWave Beam and Rate Adaptation via Combinatorial Satisficing Bandits Best of both worlds: Stochastic & adversarial best-arm identification Scalable Model-Based Clustering with Sequential Monte Carlo Expert-Guided Class-Conditional Goodness-of-Fit Scores for Interpretable Classification with Informative Missingness: An Application to Seismic Monitoring Lightweight Geometric Adaptation for Training Physics-Informed Neural Networks Gating Enables Curvature: A Geometric Expressivity Gap in Attention Zeroth-Order Optimization at the Edge of Stability Differentially Private Conformal Prediction CLion: Efficient Cautious Lion Optimizer with Enhanced Generalization Generative Augmented Inference Improving Machine Learning Performance with Synthetic Augmentation PAC-MCTS: Bias-Aware Pruning for Robust LLM-Guided Search and Planning Path-Sampled Integrated Gradients Heat and Matérn Kernels on Matchings Doubly Outlier-Robust Online Infinite Hidden Markov Model Momentum Further Constrains Sharpness at the Edge of Stochastic Stability Multistage Conditional Compositional Optimization BOAT: Navigating the Sea of In Silico Predictors for Antibody Design via Multi-Objective Bayesian Optimization
Online Convex Optimization with Switching Cost and Delaye...
Spandan Senapati, Rahul Vaze · 2023-10-18 · via stat.ML updates on arXiv.org

We consider the online convex optimization (OCO) problem with quadratic and linear switching cost in the limited information setting, where an online algorithm can choose its action using only gradient information about the previous objective function. For $L$-smooth and $μ$-strongly convex objective functions, we propose an online multiple gradient descent (OMGD) algorithm and show that its competitive ratio for the OCO problem with quadratic switching cost is at most $4(L + 5) + \frac{16(L + 5)}μ$. The competitive ratio upper bound for OMGD is also shown to be order-wise tight in terms of $L,μ$. In addition, we show that the competitive ratio of any online algorithm is $\max\{Ω(L), Ω(\frac{L}{\sqrtμ})\}$ in the limited information setting when the switching cost is quadratic. We also show that the OMGD algorithm achieves the optimal (order-wise) dynamic regret in the limited information setting. For the linear switching cost, the competitive ratio upper bound of the OMGD algorithm is shown to depend on both the path length and the squared path length of the problem instance, in addition to $L, μ$, and is shown to be order-wise, the best competitive ratio any online algorithm can achieve. Consequently, we conclude that the optimal competitive ratio for the quadratic and linear switching costs are fundamentally different in the limited information setting.